Re: Linux Plumbers Conference - Open Printing Micro Conference

On 9/21/21 1:21 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 5:36 AM Zdenek Dohnal wrote: - several other printer applications was implemented by Till Kamppeter[1][2][3][4] - Till makes it available as Snaps, I'm planning to package it into Fedora as rpm first, then later as a flatpacks How

Re: Linux Plumbers Conference - Open Printing Micro Conference

On 9/21/21 2:12 PM, Björn Persson wrote: Zdenek Dohnal wrote: the schedule for the first no-driver was proposed What is a no-driver? Ahh, sorry - word 'release' I had in my mind, but I didn't write it :D . CUPS 3.0 is planned to be the first release without classic driver support, supportin

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 17:44:07 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: So it looks like, one way or another the mozjs78 stuff will need to get patched after the source gets extracted in the build step. I found the reference to how to patch mozjs78 in 0ad. You need to have your patch file drop off

Fedora-35-20210921.n.1 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 14/141 (aarch64), 8/204 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210920.n.0): ID: 994734 Test: aarch64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/994734 ID: 994741 Test: aarch64 Ser

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 16:06:24 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: I thought of that. I tried some naive ways to do that without success. I'm not sure if any extra python packages are needed. Probably not, but if so it won't work since those will be for 3.10. There doesn't seem to be a standard

Fedora 35 compose report: 20210921.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-35-20210920.n.0 NEW: Fedora-35-20210921.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 2 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 23:03:12 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 21. 09. 21 19:19, Bruno Wolff III wrote: If there is no Python version runtime dependency there, you could temporaily use the python3.9 package to build the bundled mozjs78. I thought of that. I tried some naive ways to do that

Re: Modularity: New modulemd-packager format for building modules

On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 11:50 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > V Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 02:26:20PM +0200, Petr Pisar napsal(a): > > I'm relieved to announce an availability of the new module packaging format, > > modulemd-packager, version 3. > > > [...] > > WHAT IS CHANGING > > > > > > Sin

Re: Strange mock chainbuild issue: package has incorrect checksum

On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 10:16:17PM +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: > W dniu 21.09.2021 o 11:00, Richard W.M. Jones pisze: > >On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 11:45:39AM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > >>On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:49 AM Julian Sikorski wrote: > >>>my local kernel rebuilds have started failing for

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 21. 09. 21 19:19, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 18:16:17 +0200,  Jonathan Schleifer wrote: Am 20.09.21 um 13:31 schrieb Miro Hrončok: 0ad  ignatenkobrain, orphan, pwalter   1 weeks ago I would be interested in becoming a (co)maintainer for th

Re: Strange mock chainbuild issue: package has incorrect checksum

W dniu 21.09.2021 o 11:00, Richard W.M. Jones pisze: On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 11:45:39AM -0600, Jerry James wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:49 AM Julian Sikorski wrote: my local kernel rebuilds have started failing for no apparent reason - I was using a similar command successfully for severa

Re: How to get list of retired packages?

On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 1:29 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > And PDC is either misbehaving or I cannot use it properly: The former, I think. I just tried to launch a build and got: $ fedpkg build Could not execute build: The following error occurred while trying to get the active release branches in

Re: How to get list of retired packages?

Dne 16. 09. 21 v 14:50 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): What is the best way to get list of retired packages in F35? I can get list of all retired packages by scanning dist-git. But if I want it for one release of Fedora? And I do not want to do that manually; I rather want to script it. PDC would

Re: Self Introduction: Magnus Morton

On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 04:19:00PM +0100, Magnus Morton wrote: > Hello, > > I'm a postdoctoral researcher in the School of Informatics at the > University of Edinburgh, Scotland. I've had a few minor contributions to > free and open source software over the years and I'm looking to get more > invo

Re: Self Introduction: Bruno Larsen

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 04:08:46PM -0300, Bruno Larsen wrote: > Hello! > > I have been recently hired to help maintaining the GDB package. I > have a bit of experience with open source development, having > contributed for a few month to the QEMU project. I am very excited > to help in the near fu

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 18:16:17 +0200, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: Am 20.09.21 um 13:31 schrieb Miro Hrončok: 0ad  ignatenkobrain, orphan, pwalter   1 weeks ago I would be interested in becoming a (co)maintainer for this, but would need sponsorship. The main is

Re: Modularity: New modulemd-packager format for building modules

V Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 02:26:20PM +0200, Petr Pisar napsal(a): > I'm relieved to announce an availability of the new module packaging format, > modulemd-packager, version 3. > [...] > WHAT IS CHANGING > > > Since there was no place for the contexts in the old module format, a new

Self Introduction: Magnus Morton

Hello, I'm a postdoctoral researcher in the School of Informatics at the University of Edinburgh, Scotland. I've had a few minor contributions to free and open source software over the years and I'm looking to get more involved. I'm planning on first packaging a couple of emacs packages that are

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Prioritized bugs and issues

On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 7:00 AM wrote: > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >Prioritized bugs and issues on 2021-09-22 from 11:00:00 to 12:00:00 > America/Indiana/Indianapolis >At fedora-meetin...@libera.chat > > More information available at: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US

Re: Linux Plumbers Conference - Open Printing Micro Conference

On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 8:12 AM Björn Persson wrote: > > Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > > the schedule for the first no-driver was proposed > > What is a no-driver? > I guess some kind of abstraction at the device level so the way you talk to it is the same as any other device. In other words, the t

Re: Changes to Bugzilla query limits

V Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 09:51:14AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 07:24:28PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 3:55 PM Demi Marie Obenour > > wrote: > > > > > > Can the requests be performed concurrently? With HTTP/2 > > > and HTTP/3, sending lots of con

Re: Free Pascal and the new glibc

On Tue, 21 Sep 2021 12:19:10 - "Artur Frenszek-Iwicki" wrote: > The build was successful: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=76057984 > I see you've made a commit to the rawhide branch only; I'll go ahead and > apply the patch to the f35 branch as well. yes, please > T

Fedora-Rawhide-20210921.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 5 of 43 required tests failed, 5 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: MI

Re: Free Pascal and the new glibc

The build was successful: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=76057984 I see you've made a commit to the rawhide branch only; I'll go ahead and apply the patch to the f35 branch as well. Thanks for the help. The patch doesn't look complicated, but unfortunately I have zero exper

Re: Linux Plumbers Conference - Open Printing Micro Conference

Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > the schedule for the first no-driver was proposed What is a no-driver? Björn Persson pgp8IziBk8gfn.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signatur ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Free Pascal and the new glibc

On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 19:37:21 +0200 Dan Horák wrote: > On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 18:34:44 +0200 > Dan Horák wrote: > > > On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 18:15:44 +0200 > > Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > > * Dan Horák: > > > > > > > On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:36:33 - > > > > "Artur Frenszek-Iwicki" wrote: > > >

Fedora-IoT-36-20210921.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd x86_64 Iot dvd aarch64 Failed openQA tests: 4/15 (aarch64), 1/16 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20210919.0): ID: 993709 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/993709

Re: Linux Plumbers Conference - Open Printing Micro Conference

On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 5:36 AM Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > > Hi all, > > I attended Open Printing Micro Conference at Linux Plumbers Conference > yesterday and took notes from sessions (full notes are as an attachment). > > Here are the highlights: > > - the schedule for the first no-driver was propos

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210921.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210920.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210921.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 18 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Re: I need help with update.install_default_update_live _boot_to_anaconda module failed (Fedora 34 openssl update)

On 21. 09. 21 12:35, Lukas Ruzicka wrote: This is not OpenSSL related, probably just a minor glitch. I have restarted the test and it passed: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/993723# Thanks. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA

Re: I need help with update.install_default_update_live _boot_to_anaconda module failed (Fedora 34 openssl update)

This is not OpenSSL related, probably just a minor glitch. I have restarted the test and it passed: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/993723# On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 11:57 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello, > > I've created this Fedora 34 openssl update: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On 17. 09. 21 11:07, Sahana Prasad wrote: Hello all, The side-tag was merged yesterday. OpenSSL 3.0.0 is available in rawhide now. You can continue to port your changes for OpenSSL 3.0.0 now. The following packages FTBFS (attached), kindly have a look at them. I have switched the following pa

I need help with update.install_default_update_live _boot_to_anaconda module failed (Fedora 34 openssl update)

Hello, I've created this Fedora 34 openssl update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0ba998eb43 Repeatedly, the update.install_default_update_live test fails with: _boot_to_anaconda module failed I have no idea how to diagnose the failure at https://openqa.fedoraprojec

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210921.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210920.0): ID: 993330 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Linux Plumbers Conference - Open Printing Micro Conference

Hi all, I attended Open Printing Micro Conference at Linux Plumbers Conference yesterday and took notes from sessions (full notes are as an attachment). Here are the highlights: - the schedule for the first no-driver was proposed - approximately GA in February 2023 - but IMO it depends how o

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 12:26 PM Petr Menšík wrote: > Hello Sahana and Jakub, > > openssl-pkcs11 module failed during rebuild. It has no separate bug yet, > but missing pkcs11 engine for OpenSSL 3.0 bind build makes freeipa server > fail to even start. > > Filled bug #2005832 [1]. CentOS Stream 9

Re: Non-responsive packager: michelmno

On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 10:08:22AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > with recent commits, eg: > https://github.com/michelmno/os-autoinst-distri-opensuse/commit/d9d12b21f5441fac032ac5cadb8e05ca2024295a Ooops, wrong year. Not so recent commits ... Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, R

Re: Non-responsive packager: michelmno

On Tue, 21 Sep 2021 10:08:22 +0100 "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 09:52:15AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > The packager listed here has been receiving a daily email asking them to > > either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account s

Re: Non-responsive packager: michelmno

On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 09:52:15AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > The packager listed here has been receiving a daily email asking them to > either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS > matches an existing bugzilla account. > > Hav

Re: Strange mock chainbuild issue: package has incorrect checksum

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 11:45:39AM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:49 AM Julian Sikorski wrote: > > my local kernel rebuilds have started failing for no apparent reason - I > > was using a similar command successfully for several months. > > /mnt/openmediavault is a samba sh

Re: Any thoughts about adding Apache Arrow to Fedora+EPEL ?

Hi Kaleb, I have 0 time till the end of the month, but please let me know when you submit arrow. I'll be happy to review it, and I'll be interested in co-maintaining it. Iñaki On Mon, 20 Sept 2021 at 23:02, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > > > Out of all its dependencies, only one doesn't already ex

tmt hint 02: Under The Hood

Hi! Based on the feedback from users we've put together the second chapter of the Test Management Tool guide: Let's together dive a little bit more and look Under The Hood [0] of tmt to see how plans, tests and stories work together on a couple of examples: Plans [1] are used to enable testing an

Non-responsive packager: michelmno

Good Morning Everyone, The packager listed here has been receiving a daily email asking them to either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS matches an existing bugzilla account. Having a bugzilla account is mandatory per: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_p

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210921.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210920.0): ID: 993314 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op