Re: Changes to Bugzilla query limits

On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 3:55 PM Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 9/18/21 3:10 AM, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > > On 17/09/21 14:07, Ben Cotton wrote: > >> I'm passing along a lightly-edited announcement from the Red Hat > >> Bugzilla admins. You may have noticed this change already. The short >

Re: F36 Change: Enable exclude_from_weak_autodetect by default in LIBDNF (System-Wide Change proposal)

Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 4:02 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: >> >> On 16. 09. 21 21:43, Fabio Valentini wrote: >> > For exmple, if I remember correctly, mozilla-openh264 / gstreamer >> > support for it are installed as weak dependencies with post-GA package >> > updates. >> >> Why exact

Re: F36 Change: Enable exclude_from_weak_autodetect by default in LIBDNF (System-Wide Change proposal)

Ben Cotton wrote: > == Summary == > exclude_from_weak_autodetect enables autodetection of unmet weak > dependencies (Recommends or Supplements) of installed packages and > blocks installation of packages satisfying already unmet dependencies. > In other words: When you don't have the recommended pa

Re: Changes to Bugzilla query limits

On 9/18/21 3:10 AM, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > On 17/09/21 14:07, Ben Cotton wrote: >> I'm passing along a lightly-edited announcement from the Red Hat >> Bugzilla admins. You may have noticed this change already. The short >> version is that the search API now defaults to returning 20 bugs, b

Re: Removing kernel removes deps?

On Sat, 2021-09-18 at 14:05 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: >  kernel-headers                                                       >   >  x86_64                                        5.15.0- > 0.rc1.git0.1.fc36 >                                          @rawhide                     >   >            

Removing kernel removes deps?

I found this surprising since I have multiple kernels installed... Admittedly I was testing kernel 5.15 which might be the reason but I don't see why things like clang-devel would be removed. $ rpm -qa | grep kernel | grep 5.15 | sudo xargs dnf erase -y Dependencies resolved. =

Fedora-35-20210918.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 4/204 (x86_64), 7/141 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210917.n.0): ID: 989660 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso evince URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/989660 ID: 989719 Test: aarch64 Server-dv

Fedora-Rawhide-20210918.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 5 of 43 required tests failed, 5 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: MI

Fedora 35 compose report: 20210918.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-35-20210917.n.0 NEW: Fedora-35-20210918.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 2 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 35.87 MiB Size of dropped packages:3.48 MiB Size

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210918.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210917.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210918.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:4 Upgraded packages: 36 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:5.96 MiB

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210918.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210917.0): ID: 988868 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

soname bump in xeus

xeus 2.0.0 bumps soname from 1 to 5. I do not believe there are any dependents at this time that need rebuilding, but I am only bringing the change to F35 & Rawhide. -- Elliott ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210916.n.0 changes

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 12:06 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 16. 09. 21 v 14:19 Kalev Lember napsal(a): > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 2:14 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 1:09 PM Fedora Rawhide Report >> wrote: >> > = ADDED PACKAGES = >> > Package: atkmm2.36-2.36.1

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210918.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210917.0): ID: 988852 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: Cached Package Review Tracker

On 18/09/21 00:35, Jerry James wrote: > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 4:32 PM Ben Beasley wrote: >> It was maimed by the 10-bug default limit in the recent Bugzilla upgrade. It >> looks like people are working on it: >> >> https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/review_stats/pull-request/13 >> >> https://pagure

Re: Changes to Bugzilla query limits

On 17/09/21 14:07, Ben Cotton wrote: > I'm passing along a lightly-edited announcement from the Red Hat > Bugzilla admins. You may have noticed this change already. The short > version is that the search API now defaults to returning 20 bugs, but > authenticated calls can request up to 1000. > Is t

Re: Packaging guidelines - clarification required - Users and Groups

Vít Ondruch kirjoitti 17.9.2021 klo 13.11: Dne 16. 09. 21 v 16:01 Michal Schorm napsal(a): Hello, I seek a clarification on the "Users and Groups Guidelines" [1] chapter of the "Fedora Packaging Guidelines" [2] Please note I want such case to be clear to newcomers too. While I am an experience