Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35

On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 11:14:22AM -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > Error: > Problem: package ant-apache-log4j-1.10.9-2.fc34.noarch requires ant = > 1.10.9-2.fc34, but none of the providers can be installed > - ant-1.10.9-2.fc34.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - prob

Re: FF builds

On 9/9/21 14:22, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 2:06 PM PGNet Dev wrote: On 9/9/21 13:53, Florian Weimer wrote: Can the Firefox build be distributed among multiple machines? I frequently deploy FF from upstream builds, with updates managed from within the app. Q: Is there any hi

Re: FF builds

On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 2:23 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 07:53:02PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Neal Gompa: > > > > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 12:55 PM Demi Marie Obenour > > > wrote: > > >> Can the Firefox build be distributed among multiple machines? > > >> > > > > > >

Re: FF builds

On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 2:06 PM PGNet Dev wrote: > > On 9/9/21 13:53, Florian Weimer wrote: > >>> Can the Firefox build be distributed among multiple machines? > > I frequently deploy FF from upstream builds, with updates managed from within > the app. > > Q: Is there any historical _measure_ of s

Re: FF builds

On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 07:53:02PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Neal Gompa: > > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 12:55 PM Demi Marie Obenour > > wrote: > >> Can the Firefox build be distributed among multiple machines? > >> > > > > We'd need icecream[1] support enabled in Koji. I am not even sure Moc

Re: FF builds

On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 1:01 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > We'd need icecream[1] support enabled in Koji. I am not even sure Mock > (the build engine) supports icecream right now. This is on my list of things to investigate one day. Ceph has the same problem - builder machines with 16GB RAM can barely bu

Re: FF builds

On 9/9/21 13:53, Florian Weimer wrote: Can the Firefox build be distributed among multiple machines? I frequently deploy FF from upstream builds, with updates managed from within the app. Q: Is there any historical _measure_ of security issues fixed in @Fedora FF pkgs, before upstream gets a

Re: FF builds

* Neal Gompa: > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 12:55 PM Demi Marie Obenour > wrote: >> Can the Firefox build be distributed among multiple machines? >> > > We'd need icecream[1] support enabled in Koji. I am not even sure Mock > (the build engine) supports icecream right now. I think for Firefox, what's

Re: FF builds

On Thu, 9 Sept 2021 at 13:01, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 12:55 PM Demi Marie Obenour > wrote: > > Also, could the Fedora project itself perform at least > > basic QA for critical security patches? > > > > Who do you think is the "Fedora Project"? It's us in the community! > > >

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35

On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 1:20 PM Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 9/7/21 12:14 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > > and try to run: > > > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > > # next time you run any DNF command

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35

On 9/7/21 12:14 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > >

Heads-up: grpc 1.40.0 coming to Rawhide with C++ soname bump

In one week (September 16), or slightly later, I will build grpc 1.40.0 for Rawhide (F36). As is traditional for minor releases of grpc, the C++ ABI was broken (soversion bumped from 1.39 to 1.40). This time, the C (core) ABI remained stable (soversion 18). I will coordinate builds of packag

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35

On Tue, 2021-09-07 at 18:14 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: >  Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your > time and try to run: >   >  # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules >  # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled > again >  sudo dnf

Looking for *your* stories of Fedora history -- can we do a brief interview? (Or, send me your thoughts!)

Hey everyone! In a couple of weeks, I'm going to be giving a talk at Open Source Summit called "35 Fedora Releases in 30 minutes" (https://sched.co/lARG). This is basically going to be a whirlwind tour of our history. I was there for a lot of it, but not all, and certainly not from all perspectiv

Re: FF builds

On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 12:55 PM Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 9/9/21 12:45 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 12:42 PM Demi Marie Obenour > > wrote: > >> > >> On 9/8/21 10:49 PM, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote: > >>> Just being devil's advocate for a second here... > >>> > >>> Two

Re: FF builds

On 9/9/21 12:45 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 12:42 PM Demi Marie Obenour > wrote: >> >> On 9/8/21 10:49 PM, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote: >>> Just being devil's advocate for a second here... >>> >>> Two days to build FF in koji? Has it gotten that big or are the builds that >>>

Re: FF builds

On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 12:42 PM Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 9/8/21 10:49 PM, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote: > > Just being devil's advocate for a second here... > > > > Two days to build FF in koji? Has it gotten that big or are the builds that > > slow? > > > > :-) > > This is also a secur

Fedora-35-20210909.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 12/205 (x86_64), 8/141 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210908.n.0): ID: 974214 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/974214 ID: 974224 T

Re: FF builds

On 9/8/21 10:49 PM, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote: > Just being devil's advocate for a second here... > > Two days to build FF in koji? Has it gotten that big or are the builds that > slow? > > :-) This is also a security problem: consider a 0day exploit found in the wild. Should the FF build

Re: Disable locale forwarding in OpenSSH

Florian Weimer wrote: > I tried to bring up this topic on the OpenSSH list to get some > cross-distribution consensus, but the discussion didn't actually go > anywhere: > > Phasing out forwarding of locale settings > >

Fedora-Rawhide-20210909.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required test results missing Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: MISSING: fedora.Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2.x86_64.64bit - compose.cloud_autocloud Failed openQA tes

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35

I tested in a F33 KDE spin too. All good, no problems. Instalar 125 Pacotes Atualizar 1737 Pacotes Remover 3 Pacotes Desatualizar 3 Pacotes Em ter., 7 de set. de 2021 às 13:15, Miroslav Suchý escreveu: > Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your

Fedora-IoT-36-20210909.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20210829.0): ID: 974734 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/974734 ID: 97

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210909.n.0 changes

Hi there, On 2021-09-09 10:07 a.m., Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 12:10:45PM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210908.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210909.n.0 = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = Package: nginx-1:1.20.1-6.module_f36+12925

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210909.n.0 changes

V Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 02:07:14PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 12:10:45PM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > > OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210908.n.0 > > NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210909.n.0 > > > = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = > >

Fedora-IoT-35-20210909.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210902.0): ID: 974185 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/974185 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests complet

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35

Hello! Works for me: Installieren100 Pakete Aktualisieren 4705 Pakete Entfernen 7 Pakete Zurücksetzen 9 Pakete Gesamte Downloadgröße: 6.8 G Best Regards Christoph Am 07.09.21 um 18:14 schrieb Miroslav Suchý: Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of you

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210909.n.0 changes

On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 12:10:45PM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210908.n.0 > NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210909.n.0 > = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = > Package: nginx-1:1.20.1-6.module_f36+12925+96924a12 > Old package: nginx-1:1.21.2-1.module_f36

Fedora 35 compose report: 20210909.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-35-20210908.n.0 NEW: Fedora-35-20210909.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:12 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:102.36 MiB Size of

Re: Boot menu always displayed again?

FYI: I recreated the file anyway and it works now. The difference seem to be that there is a new second comment line at the top of the file about not modifying it. Was the format changed and no update scriplet provided at some point ? Simo. On Wed, 2021-09-08 at 15:23 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: >

Re: License of mpir package simplified to LGPLv3+

V Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 08:58:10AM +0300, Otto Urpelainen napsal(a): > Benjamin Beasley kirjoitti 8.9.2021 klo 22.07: > > The license for the mpir package has been simplified from “LGPLv3+ and > > LGPLv2+ and (LGPLv3+ or GPLv2+) and BSD” back to the effective license of > > “LGPLv3+”. > > > > See

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210909.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210908.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210909.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 8 Dropped packages:13 Upgraded packages: 229 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 5.79 MiB Size of dropped packages

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: ELN SIG on 2021-09-10 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat The meeting will be about: Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9920/ ___ devel mailin

[Test-Announce] Fedora-IoT 35 RC 20210909.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora-IoT 35 RC 20210909.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_pl

Re: What happened with sevctl?

On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 04:42:02PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 4:37 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > > > > Was there more than just the rust-sevctl package that is relevant > > here ? (I've not thought about any build deps-chain yet) > > According to > https://church

Re: Disable locale forwarding in OpenSSH

* Iñaki Ucar: > This would work... if the target system has a properly configured > locale, which is not the case many times. E.g., [1] is still > unresolved. > > [1] https://github.com/CentOS/sig-cloud-instance-images/issues/154 Right, this looks like an inconsistent /etc/locale.conf setting. I

Re: Disable locale forwarding in OpenSSH

On Thu, 9 Sept 2021 at 12:17, Florian Weimer wrote: > > There is a movement towards C.UTF-8 for small images (containers and > VMs). C.UTF-8 has both size and performance improvements over the more > traditional en_US.UTF-8 locale. (The performance improvement is > currently in upstream glibc on

Disable locale forwarding in OpenSSH

There is a movement towards C.UTF-8 for small images (containers and VMs). C.UTF-8 has both size and performance improvements over the more traditional en_US.UTF-8 locale. (The performance improvement is currently in upstream glibc only, but we plan to bring it to rawhide and Fedora 35 shortly.)

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210909.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210908.0): ID: 973693 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35

On 2021-09-07 9:14 a.m., Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' sudo dn

Re: Boot menu always displayed again?

Dne 09. 09. 21 v 8:25 Petr Pisar napsal(a): V Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 05:34:42PM +0200, Vít Ondruch napsal(a): Dne 08. 09. 21 v 15:23 Petr Pisar napsal(a): V Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 09:01:42AM -0400, Simo Sorce napsal(a): If I try to do this I get an error: # grub2-editenv - set menu_auto_hide=1 gr

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210909.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210908.0): ID: 973445 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 18:13:45 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 06. 07. 21 17:13, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: This is Python 3.10 related. https://docs.python.org/3.10/whatsnew/3.10.html#removed "Remove deprecated aliases to Collections Abstract Base Classes from the collections module

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35

On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 08:53:06AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > V Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 05:58:33PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > napsal(a): > > On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 11:53:27AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > I got this, not sure what to file against: > > > > > > Error: > > > Problem: pack