On 9/2/21 1:47 AM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Here -fno-expections on armv7hl helps.
Note that now wine builds wine-preloader also on armv7hl, so some
modification for wine.spec is needed.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=74886400
Regards,
Mamoru
Thank you, Mamoru!
Miroslav Suchý writes:
Dne 04. 09. 21 v 17:28 Sam Varshavchik napsal(a):
Are you a package maintainer? Ok: please write an selinux policy for your
package. Let me know when that's done.
https://pagure.io/copr/copr/blob/main/f/selinux
You are welcome.
You did that 7 years ago, according to
Dne 04. 09. 21 v 17:28 Sam Varshavchik napsal(a):
Are you a package maintainer? Ok: please write an selinux policy for your
package. Let me know when that's done.
https://pagure.io/copr/copr/blob/main/f/selinux
You are welcome.
Miroslav
___
devel m
On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 7:14 PM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>
>
> On 2021-08-27 5:41 a.m., Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Yeah, that's why I was thinking of arbitrarily grouping them into sets
> > of 10
> > releases. That keeps it from becoming *infinitely huge* over time.
>
> Say fedora-backgrounds is an
On 2021-08-27 5:41 a.m., Matthew Miller wrote:
Yeah, that's why I was thinking of arbitrarily grouping them into sets
of 10
releases. That keeps it from becoming *infinitely huge* over time.
Say fedora-backgrounds is an umbrella package containing a set of
fxx-backgrounds as subpackages. The
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 11/205 (x86_64), 10/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210903.n.0):
ID: 969131 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_remote_logging_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/969131
ID: 969133 Test: x86_
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required test results missing
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedora.Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2.x86_64.64bit - compose.cloud_autocloud
Failed openQA tes
Stephen Gallagher writes:
So it appears to be an SELinux issue. I suspect but cannot prove that
it's related to a number of AVCs related to DBUS that I see in
selinux-troubleshooter.
I've watched SELinux come into existence, and its evolution over the years.
It's clear to me that SELinux, let
OLD: Fedora-35-20210903.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20210904.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 5
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 6
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:35.90 MiB
Size of
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210903.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210904.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 14
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 67
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 52.02 MiB
Size of dropped packages
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210903.0):
ID: 968742 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210903.0):
ID: 968726 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
12 matches
Mail list logo
