On 8/24/21 7:24 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for
sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to
On 8/20/21 12:09 PM, Jerry James wrote:
I picked up jakarta-commons-httpclient in an attempt to keep
ant-contrib building. That proved impossible, so I removed all
dependencies on ant-contrib from packages I maintain instead. That
means I don't need jakarta-commons-httpclient, so I am orphaning
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 09:48:45PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Back when we were distributing source RPM DVDs, there was a reason to have a
> new package every release, so the files for the older releases weren't
> taking up space. But since we don't do that much anymore, maybe it would be
> bet
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 06:18:39PM -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> f35-backgrounds is ready for review which is trivia to do. It is
> needed for the beta release along desktop-background.
> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997854
Back when we were distributing source RPM DVDs, th
Hello team,
f35-backgrounds is ready for review which is trivia to do. It is needed
for the beta release along desktop-background.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997854
Thanks in advance
--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Fedora Design Team
Fedora Design Suite maintainer
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210823.0):
ID: 957984 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/957984
Soft failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 12:58 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 07:43:46AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > Are all updates paused or just f35?
> >
> > I have updates pending from f33 through f35 for over 20 hours.
>
> During freezes this is a manual process.
>
> I didn't push them ye
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 07:43:46AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Are all updates paused or just f35?
>
> I have updates pending from f33 through f35 for over 20 hours.
During freezes this is a manual process.
I didn't push them yesterday, but will do so here in a few. :)
Sorry for any delay.
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 10:53:15AM +0200, Ondrej Dubaj wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In the near future, there is a plan to merge autoconf-2.71 to rawhide. Due
> to the size of the change and possible breakage of multiple packages going
> FTBFS. The number of these packages should not be many, currently we
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 17/205 (x86_64), 13/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210823.n.0):
ID: 957285 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso anaconda_help
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/957285
ID: 957339 Test: x86_64 Workstation-
Hello everyone,
I was trying to file a bug following last QA meeting and turns out I
can't. I moved from an old laptop to a new one and in the new one I can't
login. I'm using the correct password and everything, but still is
rejecting me. And using my FAS means that I have to create a new acco
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 11:59:38AM +0200, Felix Schwarz wrote:
> Am 24.08.21 um 22:47 schrieb Steven A. Falco:
> >Should I edit the criteria in f33 so I can mark it stable before
> >the 7 days elapse, or should I let it wait? It seems weird that
> >one release would have to wait longer than the ot
Thanks to the volunteers who created WeMakeFedora.org
It is really helpful now we can see the evidence of corruption in the big free
software organizations it is so clear
No surprises that women are the biggest losers in this space. We have to work
twice as hard as men and then the intern
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 3/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20210823.0):
ID: 957674 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/957674
ID: 957676
On 8/25/21 6:29 AM, Ian McInerney wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 11:00 AM Felix Schwarz mailto:fschw...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote:
Am 24.08.21 um 22:47 schrieb Steven A. Falco:
> Should I edit the criteria in f33 so I can mark it stable before the 7
days
> elapse, or should I let
Version 2.8.0 of flint has been released, and comes with an soname
bump. I am doing test builds in mock now. If they all succeed, then
I will build flint and all consuming packages in Rawhide:
antic
arb
e-antic
eclib
linbox
normaliz
polymake
sagemath
Singular
If all goes well, I will repeat the
OLD: Fedora-35-20210823.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20210825.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 6
Added packages: 10
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 117
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 12.59 MiB
Size of dropped packages:54.11 KiB
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedora.Clou
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210823.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210825.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 20
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 161
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 118.37 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Are all updates paused or just f35?
I have updates pending from f33 through f35 for over 20 hours.
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 11:00 AM Felix Schwarz
wrote:
>
> Am 24.08.21 um 22:47 schrieb Steven A. Falco:
> > Should I edit the criteria in f33 so I can mark it stable before the 7
> days
> > elapse, or should I let it wait? It seems weird that one release would
> have to
> > wait longer than the
Am 24.08.21 um 22:47 schrieb Steven A. Falco:
Should I edit the criteria in f33 so I can mark it stable before the 7 days
elapse, or should I let it wait? It seems weird that one release would have to
wait longer than the other releases when the fix is identical for all of them.
Also I'd eve
On 25/08/2021 09:11, Lumír Balhar wrote:
Could you please briefly explain the difference?
If you package uses KDE Frameworks, you should use a special cmake macro
- %cmake_kf5.
It will automatically export the required build settings like
KDE_INSTALL_BINDIR, KDE_INSTALL_LIBDIR, etc.
$ rpm
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210824.0):
ID: 956913 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 8:57 PM przemek klosowski via devel
wrote:
>
>
> On 8/23/21 5:49 AM, Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
> > Sure. Crypto-policies are there to give you control of what's enabled,
> > ideally what's enabled by default.
> >
> > 1) There's a blanket `update-crypto-policies --set LEGACY
On Wed, 2021-08-25 at 08:21 +0200, Marek Kulik wrote:
> Hi,
> My name is Marek. I'm quite new in open source community. I
> previously work in closed source projects, mostly networking stuff.
> I'm 25 years old and I decided to try myself in opensource projects.
> I've always had a lot of admiratio
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210824.0):
ID: 956847 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2
base_service_manipulation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/956847
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8
Thank you. It works!
Could you please briefly explain the difference?
Thanks a lot.
Lumír
On 8/23/21 3:33 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 23/08/2021 11:37, Lumír Balhar wrote:
but the LIB_INSTALL_DIR is defined in the %cmake macro:
You should use %cmake_kf5 macro instead.
Don't for
28 matches
Mail list logo
