On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 05:23:18PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim via devel
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:56:39AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > On 8/10/21 8:53 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 09:01:14 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > > Dne 05. 08. 21 v 2:42 Michel Alex
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:56:39AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 8/10/21 8:53 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 09:01:14 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > Dne 05. 08. 21 v 2:42 Michel Alexandre Salim via devel napsal(a):
> > > > This is now implemented on Rawhide; Fedora updates
I believe they have.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 01:53:51PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 8/11/21 11:19 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 10:56:39 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > > On 8/10/21 8:53 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 09:01:14 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > > > Dne 05
Hi all,
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:56:39AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 8/10/21 8:53 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 09:01:14 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > Dne 05. 08. 21 v 2:42 Michel Alexandre Salim via devel napsal(a):
> > > > This is now implemented on Rawhide; Fedor
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 4:21 PM Onyeibo wrote:
>
> > 2. pipewire — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950258 —
> [...]
> Are you sure about that link (URL)?
Nope! It should have been https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983861
Thanks for catching that.
> Any clue on how to star
On Thu, Aug 12 2021 at 11:41:12 AM -0600, Jeff Law
wrote:
I don't think anyone is actively working on reducing that set. But
that to me would be quite low priority.
Actually Marek Polacek has been reporting bugs! See e.g.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1990111 for a recent
suc
I'd also like to plug Jakub's new sponsor page:
https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-sponsors/all
There you can find all currently active sponsors by language, interest, etc.
Cheers,
Dan
On August 12, 2021 7:29:10 AM UTC, Felix Schwarz
wrote:
>Hi Stephen,
>
>thank you for your interest in contrib
On 8/12/2021 10:09 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Just wonder, have somebody inherited this feature after Jeff? And is
anybody actually working on the LTO?
~~~
$ grep -R lto | grep -E 'global|define' | grep nil | wc -l
190
I don't think anyone is actively working on reducing that set. But
that t
Just wonder, have somebody inherited this feature after Jeff? And is
anybody actually working on the LTO?
~~~
$ grep -R lto | grep -E 'global|define' | grep nil | wc -l
190
~~~
Vít
Dne 30. 12. 20 v 20:52 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LTOBuildImprovements
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 01:00:26AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
...snip...
>
> I wonder why there's so few drpms in most transactions I see?
> Does this system not prioritize packages, like, those that are
> installed on all variants, or installed by default on Workstation?
So, it's complicated,
Now that we've branched, it's time to start the weekly blocker status
emails (sending on Thursday this week since tomorrow is a Red Hat
company-wide holiday).
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. libreoffice — F35FailsToInstall: libreoffice-core — MODIFIED
A
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 12:00:16AM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 02:02:39PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > drpms work by downloading the delta, then using it + the version you
> > have installed to recreate the signed rpm (just like you downloaded the
> > full si
Red Hat has a company-wide holiday this Friday, so I'm going to cancel
this meeting.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 8:00 AM wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>ELN SIG on 2021-08-13 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
>At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
>
> The meeti
On 8/12/21 2:36 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
Now that vigra went stable in f35 I'm trying to build hugin.The git
merge from rawhide worked fine as usual but when I tried 'git push' I
get this:
$ git merge rawhide
Updating 88d7c81..69827ac
Fast-forward
hugin-openexr3.patch | 17 -
Am Donnerstag, dem 12.08.2021 um 07:57 +0200 schrieb Miroslav Lichvar:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 08:27:27PM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> > All packages have been rebuilt successfully, except for vfrnav, which
> > fails for a segfault in inkscape during the testsuite.
> >
> > Both sidetag
Now that vigra went stable in f35 I'm trying to build hugin.The git merge
from rawhide worked fine as usual but when I tried 'git push' I get this:
$ git merge rawhide
Updating 88d7c81..69827ac
Fast-forward
hugin-openexr3.patch | 17 -
hugin.spec | 11 ++-
2 file
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
ELN SIG on 2021-08-13 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9920/
___
devel mailin
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210811.0):
ID: 946529 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210811.0):
ID: 946523 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_system_logging@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/946523
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_6
Hi Stephen,
thank you for your interest in contributing to Fedora. I can totally understand
that the current policies may seem overwhelming so that becoming a packager
might be seen as some kind of "elite" status.
I think I would feel the same way if I didn't become a packager ~10 years ago.
How
21 matches
Mail list logo
