On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 14:20 -0400, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> at least in the meantime, do you want to take it now that it's
> building again?
Hi,
I took it for the time being, thus the package does not vanish from
Fedora. I'll pass the ownership to the original owners once they let me
know
Björn Persson kirjoitti 6.8.2021 klo 2.44:
Petr Menšík wrote:
No, that is the reason why I proposed it. Guidelines already state
*-filesystem packages does not have to be depended on [1]. Just one,
probably systemd or systemd-libs, should depend on it to get it
installed. All other can then just
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedora.Clou
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210807.0):
ID: 943676 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/943676
Soft failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64
On 8/8/21 10:10 AM, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
Il 07/08/21 21:30, Nikolay Nikolov ha scritto:
On 8/7/21 6:19 PM, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
So, I still haven't seen anything posted in gitlab or mailing lists, so I've
posted to the FPC forums:
https://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.p
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210806.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210808.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 9
Dropped packages:8
Upgraded packages: 180
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 24.62 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Also you should inform upstream to remove exec flag from this files in
their repo/sources.
вс, 8 авг. 2021 г., 15:06 :
> I will remove the executable flag with:
> chmod 0644 *.pm
>
> Thanks a lot
> Martin
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedora
I will remove the executable flag with:
chmod 0644 *.pm
Thanks a lot
Martin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.or
On 08/08/2021 13:44, Vascom wrote:
But in /usr/share should not be executables, as I know.
Yes. 0644 will remove executable flag.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubs
But in /usr/share should not be executables, as I know.
вс, 8 авг. 2021 г., 14:43 Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>:
> On 08/08/2021 13:01, linux4mar...@gmx.de wrote:
> > How can i solve this ?
>
> Set chmod 0644 or add a shebang by patching them.
>
> --
> Sincerely,
>
On 08/08/2021 13:01, linux4mar...@gmx.de wrote:
How can i solve this ?
Set chmod 0644 or add a shebang by patching them.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe sen
Hi,
when running rpmlint -v /home/martin/rpmbuild/SRPMS/shutter-0.98-2.fc34.src.rpm
/home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/shutter-0.98-2.fc34.noarch.rpm on the shutter
binary
i get this error message:
shutter.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/shutter/resources/system/upload_plugins/uplo
Hi,
I'll take this for a review.
Regards,
Jarek Prokop
On 08/08/2021 11:13, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
Hello,
I packaged a command line gist uploader - rubygem-gist - a few weeks
ago:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979081
So far, nobody picked it up for review.
Thus, if you have e
Hello,
On Sun, Aug 1, 2021 at 7:46 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
[..]
> We do have memtester in the repository, which is a user space memory
> tester. But I can't really assess whether it's better or worse than
> one that runs in the pre-boot environment. On the one hand, less
> memory is being tested (p
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210807.0):
ID: 943183 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Hello,
I packaged a command line gist uploader - rubygem-gist - a few weeks
ago:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979081
So far, nobody picked it up for review.
Thus, if you have experience in reviewing ruby packages it would be
great if you could review it.
The package is quite sm
Il 07/08/21 19:57, Florian Weimer ha scritto:
> * Mattia Verga via devel:
>
>> So, I still haven't seen anything posted in gitlab or mailing lists, so I've
>> posted to the FPC forums:
>> https://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,55723.0.html
> You left out the most useful piece of advi
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210807.0):
ID: 943167 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Il 07/08/21 21:30, Nikolay Nikolov ha scritto:
> On 8/7/21 6:19 PM, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
>> So, I still haven't seen anything posted in gitlab or mailing lists, so I've
>> posted to the FPC forums:
>> https://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,55723.0.html
> The gitlab repositor
19 matches
Mail list logo
