Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. Again I don't
have anything in particular for the agenda.
If you're aware of anything it would be useful to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting.
Thanks!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IR
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 04:04:33PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 30. 06. 21 v 15:04 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
> > In unrelated news, what happened to the -ow...@fedoraproject.org
> > email addresses? They seem to be bouncing for me.
>
>
> Please see the "package maintainer email aliases
On 8/7/21 6:19 PM, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
So, I still haven't seen anything posted in gitlab or mailing lists, so I've
posted to the FPC forums:
https://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,55723.0.html
The gitlab repository was supposed to go public today, but yet another
iss
* Mattia Verga via devel:
> So, I still haven't seen anything posted in gitlab or mailing lists, so I've
> posted to the FPC forums:
> https://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,55723.0.html
You left out the most useful piece of advice (the .quad 0 suggestion).
Would you please add a r
So, I still haven't seen anything posted in gitlab or mailing lists, so I've
posted to the FPC forums:
https://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,55723.0.html
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210803.0):
ID: 943078 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/943078
ID: 943089 Test: x86_64 IoT-dv
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210806.0):
ID: 943062 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On 06. 08. 21 21:19, Sérgio wrote:
Hey (IMO) the packages should be orphan first , to know the impact of the
retirement , no ?
At this point, all of them are orphaned except:
eclipse
eclipse-m2e-core
eclipse-mpc
Those were unorphaned by @akurtakov, but the bugzillas are still in NEW:
https:/
On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 05:26:49PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 06. 08. 21 v 12:56 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> >On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 11:43:52AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>Dne 05. 08. 21 v 18:47 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> >>>On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 04:45:31PM +
Sure, it would contain some files on almost every system anyway.
If it contains already /usr/lib64/pm-utils/power.d, I guess it can
(co)own few directories of systemd. Much more used in my opinion.
Opened pull request for it:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/filesystem/pull-request/6
On 8/6/2
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210806.0):
ID: 943046 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
11 matches
Mail list logo
