On Sun, Jul 25, 2021, 04:03 Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> On 6/16/21 6:03 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > we've scheduled the rpmautospec plugin to be deployed into production
> > for tomorrow, from 14:00 UTC on.
> >
> > This means installing the relevant packages and restart
Salut Nicolas,
And welcome aboard!
On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 3:54 AM Nicolas FORMICHELLA wrote:
> and in process of packaging Canon IJfilter driver for AUR/RPM and DEB
A long time ago I had managed to create an rpm from canon's package
for the iP7200 printer, which conformed to our guidelines at
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 10:09:20AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Power_Profiles_Daemon
>
> == Summary ==
> We will install power-profiles-daemon in Fedora Workstation and enable
> it by default. power-profiles-daemon allows the user to choose between
> optimizin
On 6/16/21 6:03 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
Hi everybody,
we've scheduled the rpmautospec plugin to be deployed into production
for tomorrow, from 14:00 UTC on.
This means installing the relevant packages and restarting kojid
processes on the builders, which will restart any tasks which are bein
Hello,
I'm Nicolas, French student sysadmin, using the RH ecosystem as a daily
driver since ~2y, packager for some packages on the OpenBuildService,
and in process of packaging Canon IJfilter driver for AUR/RPM and DEB
(I never got the Canon-provided RPM package to work on my machine, so
going my
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 02:46:19PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> I don't see email notifications about successful and failed builds,
> even though they seem to be happening in Koji and from the above
> lists. Is it being slow or broken?
Yeah, it got stuck. I restarted it this morning and
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210722.0):
ID: 934765 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/934765
ID: 934770 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree
Hi,
Following the mass rebuild, the package utox stopped building on s390x.
The following test is failing, with a message regarding a memory leak:
+ /usr/bin/ctest --output-on-failure --force-new-ctest-process -j3
Test project /builddir/build/BUILD/uTox-0.18.1/redhat-linux-build
Start 1: te
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedora.Clou
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210720.0):
ID: 934733 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/934733
Soft failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64
Peter Oliver kirjoitti 19.7.2021 klo 10.53:
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021, 08:08 Otto Urpelainen, wrote:
However, copr seems to understand rpmautospec.
Not really. The release will always be 1. When a package builds again,
end users won't receive the updated version.
https://pagure.io/fedora-infr
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210723.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210724.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 113
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 461.45 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
On 23/07/2021 23:28, Kelly Brazil wrote:
I am the developer of JC and Jello. JC is currently packaged for Fedora and I
would like to see if anyone would consider packaging Jello as well? Or would
you know someone interested in doing so?
Hello and welcome to Fedora. You can become a package ma
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 35 Rawhide 20210724.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On 23/07/2021 23:42, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
If tuned wants to be an alternative, it would need a compatible D-Bus API.
TuneD already has a powerful D-Bus API. tuned-adm and tuned-switcher
uses it.
gnome-control-center should add integration with TuneD and not vice versa.
--
Sincerely,
V
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 10:09:20AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> == Benefit to Fedora ==
> Shipping power-profiles-daemon enables GNOME to display and offer
> users the ability to adjust configuration related to power management
> similar to other operating systems, which can improve the quality of
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
