Hello Alfredo,
I would like to maintain the following retired packages that you have formerly
maintained[1]. Upstream of each package is alive. I would be happy if you could
tell me if you know additional issues with them.
python-oslo-messaging https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-oslo-messa
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 02:20:50 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Phillip released 4.5 which has some new functionallity, some clean up
and some bug fixes. It looks like he worked pretty hard on it for
I had a successfull build after tonight's compose started, so the
earliest it will show up i
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't
have anything in particular for the agenda, F35 things are ticking over
mostly smoothly, and I'm not a fan of meetings for meetings' sake.
If you're aware of anything it would be useful to discuss this week,
please do reply to thi
On Fri, Jul 23 2021 at 05:35:11 PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
End users are able to switch between profiles with tuned-adm (CLI) or
tuned-switcher (GUI).
So to be clear, power-profiles-daemon has integration into
gnome-control-center, not an extra app. gnome-settings-daemon
integ
Hi team,
I am the developer of JC and Jello. JC is currently packaged for Fedora and I
would like to see if anyone would consider packaging Jello as well? Or would
you know someone interested in doing so?
I created a src rpm spec similar to what we used for JC, so it should be pretty
straightfo
systemd-249.2-1.fc35 was built today with -Ddefault-dns-over-tls=opportunistic
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DNS_Over_TLS, #1889901).
Please file bugs if things don't work as expected (or work when unexpected).
Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -
On Fri, 23 Jul 2021, Scott Talbert wrote:
Per the Fedora 35 schedule[1] we will start a mass rebuild for Fedora 35
on Jul 21st, 2021. We will run a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 for the
changes listed in:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open&tags=mass+rebuild
The mass rebuild will be done
On Fri, 23 Jul 2021, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Per the Fedora 35 schedule[1] we will start a mass rebuild for Fedora 35
on Jul 21st, 2021. We will run a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 for the
changes listed in:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open&tags=mass+rebuild
The mass rebuild will be don
I’d like to get python-xds-protos
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980041) reviewed so I can
update grpc to version 1.39.0 in Rawhide in time for Fedora 35.
This is a new dependency for grpc—a weirdly circular one that’s
ultimately generated from sources inside grpc, but is separa
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 2:44 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Do you think it makes sense to include expected Python releases there?
>
Definitely! I haven't done it in the last release or two, but I set up
the schedule to include upstream releases. Since Python now has
predictable schedules, I can pre-ad
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 2:43 PM Tomas Hrcka wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Per the Fedora 35 schedule[1] we will start a mass rebuild for Fedora 35
> on Jul 21st, 2021. We will run a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 for the
> changes listed in:
>
> https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open&tags=mass+rebuild
>
On 23. 07. 21 19:27, Ben Cotton wrote:
Hi everyone,
A few years ago, I created release schedules[1] through Fedora Linux
36. We've almost used up that buffer, so it's time to create the next
few years worth of schedules. Before I start that, I want to take the
opportunity to make sure the schedu
Hi everyone,
A few years ago, I created release schedules[1] through Fedora Linux
36. We've almost used up that buffer, so it's time to create the next
few years worth of schedules. Before I start that, I want to take the
opportunity to make sure the schedules match reality.
For teams that alread
On Friday, July 23, 2021 5:09:57 PM CEST Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 03:25:15PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 04:03:06PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > The ppc64le doesn't seem to build on Power8 hardware we have [2], and
> > > s390x has som
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedora.Clou
On 23/07/2021 17:16, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
Hi, there is an answer here:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/hadess/power-profiles-daemon#tuned-and-tlp
Both are good projects to use for the purpose of experimenting with particular
settings to see if they'd be something that can be implemented by
Hi, apologies for this change being submitted a little late. The change
has actually been fully implemented for a couple months now, and
already approved by the Workstation WG (it only affects Workstation),
but we feel a change proposal is important for documentation and
promotion purposes.
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 03:25:15PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 04:03:06PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > The ppc64le doesn't seem to build on Power8 hardware we have [2], and
> > s390x has some troubles with qemu emulation [3]. So those architectures
> > are at leas
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 10:17:41AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 at 10:06, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > [3] Fatal glibc error: CPU lacks VXE support (z14 or later required),
This one is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967905
Seems like it should be fixed wit
On 23/07/2021 16:09, Ben Cotton wrote:
We will install power-profiles-daemon in Fedora Workstation and enable
it by default. power-profiles-daemon allows the user to choose between
optimizing for system performance or battery life.
Why not TuneD[1] (developed by Red Hat by the way)?
TuneD is a
On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 10:17:41 -0400
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 at 10:06, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > just for the info, we enabled the `centos-stream-9-x86_64` and
> > `centos-stream-9-aarch64` chroots in Fedora Copr. Note that we build
> > directly from c
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 04:03:06PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> The ppc64le doesn't seem to build on Power8 hardware we have [2], and
> s390x has some troubles with qemu emulation [3]. So those architectures
> are at least for now disabled.
> [3] Fatal glibc error: CPU lacks VXE support (z14 or
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 10:04:51AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2021, at 3:24 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > Hi Colin,
> >
> > Intrigued by what this is doing:
> > https://github.com/cgwalters/coreos-diskimage-rehydrator/tree/main/src
> >
> > A few questions:
> >
> > Don
On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 at 10:06, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> just for the info, we enabled the `centos-stream-9-x86_64` and
> `centos-stream-9-aarch64` chroots in Fedora Copr. Note that we build
> directly from composes [1] without mirrors (some failures can expected),
> and that the packag
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Power_Profiles_Daemon
== Summary ==
We will install power-profiles-daemon in Fedora Workstation and enable
it by default. power-profiles-daemon allows the user to choose between
optimizing for system performance or battery life.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Ha
Hi all,
just for the info, we enabled the `centos-stream-9-x86_64` and
`centos-stream-9-aarch64` chroots in Fedora Copr. Note that we build
directly from composes [1] without mirrors (some failures can expected),
and that the packages are not GPG-signed. You have been warned :-)
The ppc64le doe
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 01:27:59PM +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Per the Fedora 35 schedule[1] we will start a mass rebuild for Fedora 35
> on Jul 21st, 2021. We will run a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 for the
> changes listed in:
>
> https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open&tags=mass+
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021, at 7:20 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> I think I'd prefer that if you intend to do CLI wrappers, that the
> wrapper matches the semantics of the original tools as much as
> possible.
>
> That is, "dnf|yum install " should overlay RPMs on the system,
I can certainly see ultimate
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210722.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210723.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 124
Downgraded packages: 4
Size of added packages: 501.32 KiB
Size of dropped packages
This is now resolved in rawhide. Thanks to all who have helped to get
us to this point.
Florian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 7:03 AM Colin Walters wrote:
>
> I was originally thinking of this as a Change, but since it won't be enabled
> by default, and I think it's most useful to gather feedback from this group
> first:
>
> See https://coreos.github.io/rpm-ostree/cliwrap/
> This is available si
Hi
mingw-qt5-* package ship some host tools for the cross-compiled
toolchain, installing them to
/usr/$mingw_target/bin
which depend on a bunch of libraries (libQt5Bootstrap.so.5,
libQt5QmlDevTools.so.5, libQt5BootstrapDBus.so.5), which are installed in
/usr/$mingw_target/lib
These host t
Hello Fedorans and especially Pythonistas,
The Python Maintenance team from Red Hat just submitted a proposal [1] for a
hackfest on Nest with Fedora [2].
With the new Python packaging guidelines [3], changes of your spec files are
necessary to benefit from all the new fancy stuff, such as aut
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210722.0):
ID: 933669 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Hi,
today a new major version 3.0.0 of mariadb-java-client landed in
Fedora-Rawhide. This version is not 100% compatible with the previous
version 2.7.3, but it should not affect many applications. The reason for
such an update is, that we want this version to be present in RHEL-9-beta
and accordi
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210722.0):
ID: 933653 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Phillip released 4.5 which has some new functionallity, some clean up and
some bug fixes. It looks like he worked pretty hard on it for about
the last 6 months. I don't think that the new functionallity will break
any of our normal stuff, but if something breaks that uses it, that would
be a go
37 matches
Mail list logo
