Otto Urpelainen writes:
> Dan Čermák kirjoitti 17.7.2021 klo 23.10:
>> Robert-André Mauchin writes:
>>
>>> What is the situation wrt new packages? Should we enforce the use of
>>> rpmautospec during reviews or is it completely optional?
>>
>> I think we should encourage the usage of rpmautospe
On Saturday, July 17, 2021 3:18:02 PM CEST Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 17:59, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >
> > We touched this topic several times before in our team. Perhaps we should
> > move
> > on and do it... it would simplify a development (the yum/dnf hacks,
> > lega
On Saturday, July 17, 2021 9:08:48 PM CEST Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 9:19 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 17:59, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > >
> > > We touched this topic several times before in our team. Perhaps we
> > > should move
> > > on
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 6/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210717.0):
ID: 930498 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/930498
ID: 930501 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_os
On 18.07.21 16:06, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> mt32emu - C/C++ library for emulating Roland MT-32, CM-32L and LAPC-I
> synthesizer modules
> A cmake project that is somewhat complicated by the fact that it comes
> from a monorepo that also contains other related projects.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 19:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2021-07-19 19:00 UTC'
Links to all issues can be fo
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 5/199 (x86_64), 10/138 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210717.n.0):
ID: 930172 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server
URL: https://o
Christopher Engelhard kirjoitti 16.7.2021 klo 11.39:
Hi all,
I finally found some time to unbundle all the 3rdparty PHP/composer
libraries from the nextcloud package.
The bad news is that due to their various dependency trees, I now have a
total of 24 new packages that need reviewing.
The good n
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210717.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210718.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 59
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 10.89 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 6:09 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 17/07/2021 23:15, Ron Olson wrote:
> > I’m curious as to why submitting a new build to Bodhi takes a week to be
> > pushed to stable, but two weeks for EPEL-8.
>
> Enterprise-grade stability.
>
That's not really the reason wh
On 17/07/2021 23:15, Ron Olson wrote:
I’m curious as to why submitting a new build to Bodhi takes a week to be pushed
to stable, but two weeks for EPEL-8.
Enterprise-grade stability.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel m
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210717.0):
ID: 930136 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Dan Čermák kirjoitti 17.7.2021 klo 23.10:
Robert-André Mauchin writes:
What is the situation wrt new packages? Should we enforce the use of
rpmautospec during reviews or is it completely optional?
I think we should encourage the usage of rpmautospec for new packages,
provided that the packag
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210717.0):
ID: 930120 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
14 matches
Mail list logo
