On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 7:19 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 08:37:03AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 20 2021 at 07:29:16 AM -0400, Neal Gompa
> > wrote:
> > >Most of our rules are designed to make sure there's someone ultimately
> > >responsibl
On Fri, 2021-06-18 at 16:37 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-06-18 at 17:05 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > coffee-script package was recently retired due to being orphaned and
> > FTBFS for some while. Since there are some other packages depending
> > on
> > it, I have decide
On Sun, 2021-06-20 at 17:24 -0500, Ron Olson wrote:
> Hey all-
>
> I’m trying to run a mock build with EPEL-8 (epel-8-x86_64) and it fails
> with:
>
https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=epel-8&arch=x86_64
is working for me
mock -r epel-8-x86_64 --install kernel-headers also work
Hey all-
I’m trying to run a mock build with EPEL-8 (epel-8-x86_64) and it fails with:
[MIRROR] kernel-headers-4.18.0-305.3.1.el8_4.x86_64.rpm: Status code: 403 for
https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/repo/rhel/rhel8/koji/latest/x86_64/RHEL-8-001/non_modular/kernel-headers-4.18.0-305.3.1.e
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 09:02:08AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18 2021 at 08:02:05 AM +1000, Peter Hutterer
> wrote:
> > Right now pipewire gets around this by hardcoding pipewire-media-session
> > and
> > starting it directly (instead of the systemd service) but that makes it
>
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 8:45 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> My question would be: Are these automated builds otherwise known working
> and ready for integration testing with the rest of the distribution in
> rawhide?
>
> If they are, we (just) need to fix the bot to not do the wrong thing.
>
> If they
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 02:36:57PM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 1:30 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
...snip...
> >
> > Rawhide is still not your CI environment.
>
> By the way I think we need to reconsider this statement.
I think we should turn it around and say:
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't
have anything urgent on the agenda again, so let's take a break.
If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting.
Thanks!
--
Adam Williamso
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 03:26:52PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> Yeah. I'm looking a the original ticket in
> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2228, and I think this was a mistake.
> We shouldn't have approved a bot that packages snapshot commits for
> rawhide. In the discussion, we t
On Sun, 2021-06-20 at 10:42 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 20. 06. 21 9:39, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > I think we should just disable this particular bot until it fixed.
> > We should also clarify/update the Update Guidelines so that
> > undesirable
> > updates are disallowed, no matte
Miro Hrončok writes:
>> - releng and SIGs submitting scripted mass rebuilds (no actual package
>> changes, triggered by a person)
>> - bots submitting rawhide builds for ELN (no package change, just
>> built for different buildroot)
> Other random ideas of what should be allowed:
> - a human app
On Sun, 2021-06-20 at 12:52 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > Rawhide is still not your CI environment. Years ago, we got rid of
> > alphas for the express purpose to stabilize Rawhide into alpha
> > quality. Stuff like this degrades the quality of Rawhide because they
> > make the assumption that n
Dnia Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 10:39:34AM +0200, Miro Hrončok napisał(a):
> On 19. 06. 21 22:18, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > The following things should still be allowed:
> > - releng and SIGs submitting scripted mass rebuilds (no actual package
> > changes, triggered by a person)
> > - bots submitting r
On Sun, 2021-06-20 at 07:29 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> If you want the features of Rawhide for CI, then we should talk about
> enabling this in more places. For example, there's no technical reason
> we couldn't do OpenQA runs for packages in COPR. There are serious
> consequences to shipping pa
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 17/134 (aarch64), 15/199 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 10:55:00AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 10:45 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > I think this is a good idea. This particular bot has a history of
> > misbehavior
> > and rather than banning all the well behaving bots (that be definition we
> > don'
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 08:37:03AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 20 2021 at 07:29:16 AM -0400, Neal Gompa
> wrote:
> >Most of our rules are designed to make sure there's someone ultimately
> >responsible for everything going into Fedora. Unfortunately, bots are
> >the opposite of t
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 6/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210619.0):
ID: 913018 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/913018
ID: 913027 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_os
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 03:19:27PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hello Zbigniew,
>
> Thank you very much for your answers and sorry for the late reply, IRL
> things have been hectic. I've had the problem with pipewire once since
> I last wrote, but I can't figure out how to trigger it at wi
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 10:17 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 18 2021 at 08:02:05 AM +1000, Peter Hutterer
> wrote:
> > Right now pipewire gets around this by hardcoding
> > pipewire-media-session and
> > starting it directly (instead of the systemd service) but that makes
> > it hard
On Sun, Jun 20 2021 at 07:29:16 AM -0400, Neal Gompa
wrote:
Most of our rules are designed to make sure there's someone ultimately
responsible for everything going into Fedora. Unfortunately, bots are
the opposite of that, because there's no one to reach to stop bad
behavior when it happens.
H
Hi,
I'll take care of packaging rust-target and just.
Best regards,
--
Olivier
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproje
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210619.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210620.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 61
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
Hello Zbigniew,
Thank you very much for your answers and sorry for the late reply, IRL
things have been hectic. I've had the problem with pipewire once since
I last wrote, but I can't figure out how to trigger it at will.
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 8:36 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On
The dippi package has been updated to 3.1.0 for ElementaryOS 6 in Rawhide.
Upstream clarified the licensing, and the entire program is now GPLv3+ with CC0
AppStream metadata. Based on this, and on recent discussion suggesting a
community preference for using effective licenses where feasible, th
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 1:30 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 7:10 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> > > With things like [0] (TL;DR: bots submitting broken builds to rawhide)
> > > becoming a more regular occurrence, I propose that we extend the
> > > existing Updates Policy [1
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 12:31 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 7:10 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> > > With things like [0] (TL;DR: bots submitting broken builds to rawhide)
> > > becoming a more regular occurrence, I propose that we extend the
> > > existing Updates Policy [1] to
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 7:10 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> > With things like [0] (TL;DR: bots submitting broken builds to rawhide)
> > becoming a more regular occurrence, I propose that we extend the
> > existing Updates Policy [1] to make it explicit that bots are not
> > allowed to submit builds
> With things like [0] (TL;DR: bots submitting broken builds to rawhide)
> becoming a more regular occurrence, I propose that we extend the
> existing Updates Policy [1] to make it explicit that bots are not
> allowed to submit builds / updates - even to rawhide - unattended:
> "Rawhide is not your
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210619.0):
ID: 912645 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_reboot_unmount
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/912645
ID: 912646 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qc
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 10:45 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> I think this is a good idea. This particular bot has a history of misbehavior
> and rather than banning all the well behaving bots (that be definition we
> don't
> even know about, because they behave good), we should disable this particula
On 20. 06. 21 9:39, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
I think we should just disable this particular bot until it fixed.
We should also clarify/update the Update Guidelines so that undesirable
updates are disallowed, no matter if submitted by a bot or a human.
I think this is a good idea. This
On 19. 06. 21 22:18, Fabio Valentini wrote:
The following things should still be allowed:
- releng and SIGs submitting scripted mass rebuilds (no actual package
changes, triggered by a person)
- bots submitting rawhide builds for ELN (no package change, just
built for different buildroot)
Other
On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 10:18:45PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> With things like [0] (TL;DR: bots submitting broken builds to rawhide)
> becoming a more regular occurrence, I propose that we extend the
> existing Updates Policy [1] to make it explicit that bots are not
> allow
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210619.0):
ID: 912635 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 03:44:11PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 2:52 PM Fedora Rawhide Report
> wrote:
> >
> > = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
> > Package: crun-0.19.1.13-0.15.git63400f2.fc35
> > Old package: crun-0.20.1.3-0.14.git9dec366.fc35
> > Summary: OCI
36 matches
Mail list logo
