Re: Seeking advice with rust packing guidelines

On 6/11/21 6:27 AM, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote: Hey everyone, I have been reading the current guideline here: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Rust/ and for the most it´s pretty clear when packaging a standalone crate / rust generated binaries (given this is my very firs

Seeking advice with rust packing guidelines

Hey everyone, I have been reading the current guideline here: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Rust/ and for the most it´s pretty clear when packaging a standalone crate / rust generated binaries (given this is my very first step into understanding rust). I am curre

Intent to orphan: sphinx

I adopted sphinx[1] a while back. At the time it was relevant to some work I was doing. It is not anymore. Since I've basically ignored it for a while, I figure it's time to turn it over. Neither of the co-maintainers indicated an interest in taking it over, so I'm going to orphan it in a week if n

Re: Intent to orphan maven-verifier-plugin

On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 9:49 AM Ben Cotton wrote: > > I adopted maven-verifier-plugin because it was a transitive dependency > for condor back in December 2019. I did essentially nothing with it. > It is no longer a part of the dependency chain and is about to fall > victim to the Javapocalypse[1].

Re: dracut broken in 054 -- bz#1965585

On Thu, 2021-06-10 at 08:20 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 11:32:53PM -, Alexander Scheel wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I wanted to raise awareness of > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1965585: this has regressed in > > dracut 054 and the pending dracut 055

Re: F35 Change: Make btrfs the default file system for Fedora Cloud (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 07:53:04PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 10:29:50AM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:19 AM David Duncan wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2021, 4:13 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> On Wed,

Re: dracut broken in 054 -- bz#1965585

On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 11:32:53PM -, Alexander Scheel wrote: > Hello all, > > I wanted to raise awareness of > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1965585: this has regressed in > dracut 054 and the pending dracut 055 update > (https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-a3

Re: [HEADS UP] libgta SONAME bump in Fedora 34

On Tuesday, 08 June 2021 at 21:23, Jiri Kucera wrote: > Hi Dominik, > > from paraview source rpm is produced paraview-devel which is a dependency > of libeml-devel and libmatroska-devel: > > [root@fedora ~]# dnf --enablerepo '*-source' repoquery --whatrequires > paraview-devel > Last metadata exp

Fedora-IoT-34-20210610.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210525.0): ID: 904966 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/904966 ID: 90

Re: F35 Change: Use yescrypt as default hashing method for shadow passwords (System-Wide Change proposal)

I can do it, once its gets approved/included On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 6:21 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 3:00 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/yescrypt_as_default_hashing_method_for_shadow > > > > == Summary == > > Make the yescrypt hashing me

Re: F35 Change: Use yescrypt as default hashing method for shadow passwords (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 3:00 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/yescrypt_as_default_hashing_method_for_shadow > > == Summary == > Make the yescrypt hashing method the default method used for new user > passwords stored in /etc/shadow. > > > == Owner == > * Name: [[User:

Fedora-IoT-35-20210610.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 6/16 (x86_64), 8/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210529.0): ID: 904935 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/904935 ID: 904936 Test: x86_64 IoT-dv

Re: What are https://src.fedoraproject.org/container ?

On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 5:51 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 09:39:38AM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 09:02:47 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > > This appeared yesterday: > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/container/libguestfs > > > > > > I'

[Test-Announce] Fedora-IoT 35 RC 20210610.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora-IoT 35 RC 20210610.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_pl

Re: goocanvas2-cairotypes mock build fails

V Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 07:26:53AM -, Martin Gansser napsal(a): > sorry forgot to send the link to the spec file [2] > > [2] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/ErrorReports/goocanvas2-cairotypes.spec You should looked at . It would s

Re: goocanvas2-cairotypes mock build fails

Thanks BuildRequires: perl-macros was missing. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-condu

orphaning java-atk-wrapper

Hello! Without system integration it have no reason to keep this component alive. To enable accessibility in java applications, follow the upstream guidelines. J. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/java-atk-wrapper -- Jiri Vanek Mgr. Principal QA Software Engineer Red Hat Inc. +420 775 39

Re: What are https://src.fedoraproject.org/container ?

On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 10:50:42 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 09:39:38AM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 09:02:47 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > > This appeared yesterday: > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/container/libguestfs > > > > >

Re: What are https://src.fedoraproject.org/container ?

On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 09:39:38AM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 09:02:47 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > This appeared yesterday: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/container/libguestfs > > > > I'm wondering what it is? > > That should be the container image generated

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210610.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210609.0): ID: 904917 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_package_install_remove URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/904917 ID: 904918 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-

Re: What are https://src.fedoraproject.org/container ?

On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 09:02:47 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > This appeared yesterday: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/container/libguestfs > > I'm wondering what it is? That should be the container image generated from the Fedora package for the Fedora registry: https://docs.fedoraproject

Re: [HEADS UP] udftools is going to be updated to 2.3

Il 10/06/21 08:58, Jiri Kucera ha scritto: > Hello, > > I am going to update udftools to 2.3 plus backport the latest upstream fixes > introduced after this release. This should have no negative impact (no > library is distributed and dnf tells me that nothing depends on udftools). kpmcore has

What are https://src.fedoraproject.org/container ?

This appeared yesterday: https://src.fedoraproject.org/container/libguestfs I'm wondering what it is? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-df lists disk usage of guests

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210610.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210601.0): ID: 904850 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: goocanvas2-cairotypes mock build fails

sorry forgot to send the link to the spec file [2] [2] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/ErrorReports/goocanvas2-cairotypes.spec ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org F

Re: goocanvas2-cairotypes mock build fails

On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 02:56, Martin Gansser wrote: > > Hi, > > I'am trying to build goocanvas2-cairotypes with mock, but this fails with > this error message [1]: > > Files found in blib/arch: installing files in blib/lib into architecture > dependent library tree > Installing > /builddir/buil