Hello,
I am going to update udftools to 2.3 plus backport the latest upstream
fixes introduced after this release. This should have no negative impact
(no library is distributed and dnf tells me that nothing depends on
udftools).
The list of changes according to upstream:
* mkudffs:
* Added sup
Hi,
I'am trying to build goocanvas2-cairotypes with mock, but this fails with this
error message [1]:
Files found in blib/arch: installing files in blib/lib into architecture
dependent library tree
Installing
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/goocanvas2-cairotypes-0.001-1.fc35.x86_64/usr/lib64/perl5/v
Hi all,
I will be updating abseil-cpp to version 20210324.2 in rawhide. I'll
handle rebuilding the following dependencies as well:
bloaty
fcitx5-mozc
grpc
Rich
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 6/9/21 15:53, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 10:29:50AM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote:
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:19 AM David Duncan wrote:
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021, 4:13 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 06:52:40AM -, David Duncan wrote
Hello all,
I wanted to raise awareness of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1965585: this has regressed in
dracut 054 and the pending dracut 055 update
(https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-a3ab421a63) does not fix
it.
Seeing as this is a regression affecting several
On Wed, 2021-06-09 at 19:53 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Yeah, I think we have to accept that there won't be any kernel support
> in RHEL in a timeframe that matters for Fedora, and the RHEL host will
> not be
> able to mount the images natively. So the questions for me are:
> 1. I t
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 10:29:50AM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:19 AM David Duncan wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 9, 2021, 4:13 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 06:52:40AM -, David Duncan wrote:
> >> > Bumping this for technical d
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 03:31:07PM -0500, Greg Hellings wrote:
>
> While you might have no choice, I'd caution that there a few traps
> with using Epoch, not just with Koji. One particular trap is that
> subpackage dependencies like:
>
> %package devel
> ...
> Requires: %{name}%{?_i
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 03:31:07PM -0500, Greg Hellings wrote:
>
> This problem is because koji ignores the epoch when checking if a build
> version already exists and stores output in directories whose name does
> not contain the epoch. The solution is simply to *also* bump the release
> tag to
Susi,
I've updated the repository in GitHub to allow issues to be followed.
How did you install the certificate? I had to go through some of the deep
Windows internals. Clicking the file and adding it directly wasn't enough, but
my machine was also the dev machine so there's lots of things that
Seeing as I've moved on from Fedora packaging... :-)
And dogtag-pki no longer depends on python-nss... :-)
I'd like to orphan python-nss. But in case anyone wants it, I'm making this
offer before I officially orphan the package.
There's some context here that Red Hat formerly was the sponsor (
Hi Sam,
Le 6/9/21 à 5:37 PM, Sam Clements a écrit :
Hi!
My name is Sam, a DevOps engineer maintaining build and release pipelines. I've
previously published my own open-source projects (including python-colorlog
which is already distributed in Fedora). I'll be working with Neal Gompa and
Dal
Welcome aboard Sam.
Envoyé depuis ProtonMail mobile
\ Message d'origine
Le 9 juin 2021 11 h 37, Sam Clements < s...@borntyping.co.uk > a écrit :
>
>
>
> Hi!
>
>
>
> My name is Sam, a DevOps engineer maintaining build and release pipelines.
> I've previously published my own
Hi!
My name is Sam, a DevOps engineer maintaining build and release pipelines.
I've previously published my own open-source projects (including
python-colorlog which is already distributed in Fedora). I'll be working
with Neal Gompa and Dalton Miner, and learning about packaging from them.
Cheers
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:19 AM David Duncan wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021, 4:13 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 06:52:40AM -, David Duncan wrote:
>> > Bumping this for technical discussion. We are planning to put this in
>> > action if there a
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 02:00:00PM +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> Hey everybody,
>
> we've recently deployed the changes needed to enable automatic RPM
> release numbers and changelogs to Koji in staging, and now we want you
> to throw things at it!
>
> Detailed information is below, but the gis
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021, 4:13 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 06:52:40AM -, David Duncan wrote:
> > Bumping this for technical discussion. We are planning to put this in
> action if there are no technical objections.
>
> Please wait until the FESCo has approved the
On 09. 06. 21 2:44, Michel Alexandre Salim via devel wrote:
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 05:38:27PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim via devel
wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 03:58:04PM +0200, Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
Hello.
As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.10 side
t
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 03:31:07PM -0500, Greg Hellings wrote:
> Quick question about the Epoch tag in a spec file: I goofed during
> F34's rawhide series and packaged an RC of my package with the wrong
> version name (1.9.0RC3-1 instead of 1.9.0-0.1) which causes it to
> sort higher in ordering th
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 10:20:28AM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi Rich,
>
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 04:09:33PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I haven't filed a bug yet because I'm not sure what component to
> > assign this too. I upgraded to Rawhide this morning and noticed that
> > some
Hi,
In resume you are rindolf and don't have access to fedora anymore ? and
you want that someone update it for you ?
I can happily do that, if you give me permissions in fortune-mod , as
you know my fas name is sergiomb , can you acess to
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fortune-mod via web ?
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210604.0):
ID: 904379 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_package_install_remove
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/904379
ID: 904380 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 06:52:40AM -, David Duncan wrote:
> Bumping this for technical discussion. We are planning to put this in action
> if there are no technical objections.
Please wait until the FESCo has approved the Change.
Zbyszek
___
devel
* finalzone (~Thunderbi@fedora/Finalzone) has joined
hi all! Can someone please update fortune-mod to 3.6.1 in fedora?
https://github.com/shlomif/fortune-mod/releases/tag/fortune-mod-3.6.1
anyone?
* finalzone has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
rindolf: the maintainer must do it
t
I'm pleased to announce that we have another Mock release:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/wiki/Release-Notes-2.11
There are some bug-fixes, but also new features like the `%_platform_multiplier`
macro and `--install` command support for "external dependencies". See the
release no
Hi Rich,
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 04:09:33PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I haven't filed a bug yet because I'm not sure what component to
> assign this too. I upgraded to Rawhide this morning and noticed that
> some tests that previously ran OK are now timing out. It turned out
> that the
26 matches
Mail list logo
