Am 02.06.21 um 05:20 schrieb Xiaofeng Wang:
This sounds fine, thanks.
You are welcome. If there are any problems just ask here.
Thank you for contributing to a better Fedora.
Felix
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscri
> Am 01.06.21 um 14:15 schrieb xiaofeng:
>
> Would you mind explaining a bit what part you are struggeling with?
>
> Having a first PR is great! Actually if the maintainer of qt-creator is
> responsive you could work quite a while without the need of getting sponsored.
> (If possible, just contr
On Mon, 2021-05-31 at 15:19 +0200, Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
> > Am 28.05.2021 um 23:08 schrieb Chris Murphy <
> > li...@colorremedies.com>:
> >
> > > ……
> >
> > All I mean by this is to push back on the idea that the proposal
> > for
> > Cloud translates into delaying the decision for Server by 5
Hey all, I’m trying to build my package for EPEL and got a strange error
clang-11: error: argument unused during compilation:
'-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1'
[-Werror,-Wunused-command-line-argument]
clang-11: error: argument unused during compilation:
'-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redha
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:36 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 4:34 PM Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> >
> > Hans de Goede kirjoitti 1.6.2021 klo 21.02:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 6/1/21 6:20 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > >> Hello all.
> > >>
> > >> doxbox-staging is trying to over
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 6:22 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 6:06 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 4:49 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > >
> > > CentOS has not yet released 8.4.
> >
> > Is there any reason to think there will ever be one? I'm staring at
> >
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 6:24 PM Ron Olson wrote:
>
> Out of curiosity, what will EPEL be built on going forward, if CentOS fades
> away and CentOS Stream takes its place?
>
EPEL has been and always will be built on Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
The EPEL-Next initiative will allow for reconciling EPEL
Oh, so, wait, when doing an EPEL build, is it against CentOS or RHEL? Honestly
I always thought CentOS was the image being using by Koji for rpm builds.
On 1 Jun 2021, at 15:49, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> CentOS has not yet released 8.4.
>
> On 6/1/21 2:45 PM, Ron Olson wrote:
>> Hm, maybe it’s st
Out of curiosity, what will EPEL be built on going forward, if CentOS fades
away and CentOS Stream takes its place?
On 1 Jun 2021, at 17:21, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 6:06 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 4:49 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>>
>>> CentOS ha
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 6:06 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 4:49 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
> >
> > CentOS has not yet released 8.4.
>
> Is there any reason to think there will ever be one? I'm staring at
> the announcement of CentOS 8 Stream at
> https://blog.centos.org/202
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 4:49 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> CentOS has not yet released 8.4.
Is there any reason to think there will ever be one? I'm staring at
the announcement of CentOS 8 Stream at
https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/ , and I don't
see any hint that 8.4 will b
CentOS has not yet released 8.4.
On 6/1/21 2:45 PM, Ron Olson wrote:
> Hm, maybe it’s still rolling out? I fired up a new centos container and got:
>
>
> [root@4c38ec50ea30 /]# more /etc/os-release
> NAME="CentOS Linux"
> VERSION="8"
> ID="centos"
> ID_LIKE="rhel fedora"
> VERSION_ID
Hm, maybe it’s still rolling out? I fired up a new centos container and got:
[root@4c38ec50ea30 /]# more /etc/os-release
NAME="CentOS Linux"
VERSION="8"
ID="centos"
ID_LIKE="rhel fedora"
VERSION_ID="8"
PLATFORM_ID="platform:el8"
PRETTY_NAME="CentOS Linux 8"
ANSI_COLOR="0;31"
CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:cento
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 4:34 PM Otto Urpelainen wrote:
>
> Hans de Goede kirjoitti 1.6.2021 klo 21.02:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 6/1/21 6:20 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> >> Hello all.
> >>
> >> doxbox-staging is trying to overwrite the regular dosbox package:
> >>
> >> Installing:
> >> dosbox-s
Hans de Goede kirjoitti 1.6.2021 klo 21.02:
Hi,
On 6/1/21 6:20 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
Hello all.
doxbox-staging is trying to overwrite the regular dosbox package:
Installing:
dosbox-staging x86_64 0.76.0-2.fc34 fedora
1.4 M
replacing do
On 5/25/21 7:29 AM, Major Hayden wrote:
1) Should I make separate Fedora packages/specs for each CLI
component and the SDK components? The SDK components look
nearly identical from a packaging standpoint (no executables
there, just libraries in each). If so, that would be abo
Hi Kamil,
On Tuesday, 2021-06-01 10:38:40 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> I'd still prefer if I didn't have to register an IRC nick and didn't need
> to communicate with Appservice and NickServ (I just wish to forget about
> IRC completely), hopefully that will be possible in the future.
Doubtful. Y
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/42 (x86_64)
ID: 900280 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/900280
ID: 900293 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/900293
Passe
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 7:00 AM wrote:
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>Prioritized bugs and issues on 2021-06-02 from 11:00:00 to 12:00:00
> America/Indiana/Indianapolis
>At fedora-meetin...@libera.chat
>
> The meeting will be about:
> Evaluation meeting
>
> More information av
Hi,
On 6/1/21 6:20 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> doxbox-staging is trying to overwrite the regular dosbox package:
>
> Installing:
> dosbox-staging x86_64 0.76.0-2.fc34 fedora
> 1.4 M
> replacing dosbox.x86_64 0.74.3-7.fc34
>
> Fr
On 5/9/21 1:32 AM, Greg Hellings wrote:
> I may be hair-brained to do this, but I've put together an installer for
> Fedora on WSL.
>
> It mostly follows the procedures that had been much talked about in a
> blog post about running Fedora 33 in the WSL2, but it uses the direct
> installer rather t
On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 06:26 -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> Adam Williamson writes:
>
> > [...]
> > But some other channels that are not Fedora channels, but which a lot
> > of Fedora people are interested in, decided to move, or at least to
> > tell people that they also had a channel on the ne
Hello all.
doxbox-staging is trying to overwrite the regular dosbox package:
Installing:
dosbox-stagingx86_640.76.0-2.fc34
fedora1.4 M
replacing dosbox.x86_64 0.74.3-7.fc34
From its SPEC[1]:
# This package is a drop-in replacement for dosbox
Provid
Hi everyone,
The F35 Change proposal deadlines are coming up:
* 2021-06-23 — Change submission deadline (Changes requiring
infrastructure changes)
* 2021-06-29 — Change submission deadline (System-Wide Changes,
Changes requiring mass rebuild)
* 2021-07-20 — Change submission deadline (Self-Contai
Am 01.06.21 um 14:15 schrieb xiaofeng:
Actually, I just have trouble following the guide.
Would you mind explaining a bit what part you are struggeling with?
Having a first PR is great! Actually if the maintainer of qt-creator is
responsive you could work quite a while without the need of ge
On 6/1/21 4:20 PM, xiaofeng wrote:
Could anyone please kindly sponsor me?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorap
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 11:38 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/InstallGPTwithKickstart
>
This proposal has been withdrawn by the owner.
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
Hi,
Could anyone please kindly sponsor me?
I have made my first PR here at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qt-creator/pull-request/5
Thanks.
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 9:26 PM xiaofeng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 8:15 PM xiaofeng wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 7:00 P
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 8:15 PM xiaofeng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 7:00 PM Qiyu Yan wrote:
>
>> 在 2021-06-01星期二的 16:18 +0800，xiaofeng写道：
>> > Hi, all,
>> >
>> > My name is Xiaofeng, I am using Fedora for the first time since Fedora
>> > 13. Currently I work on RHEL like distrib
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 05:17:43PM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
Just a heads-up, texlive-base (where the compiled code and immediate
dependencies lives) and texlive (where the thousands of other noarch
components live) have been updated to TeXLive 2021 in Rawhide (and the
latest available component
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 7:00 PM Qiyu Yan wrote:
> 在 2021-06-01星期二的 16:18 +0800，xiaofeng写道：
> > Hi, all,
> >
> > My name is Xiaofeng, I am using Fedora for the first time since Fedora
> > 13. Currently I work on RHEL like distributions for C++ development, I
> > am willing to join the fedora p
在 2021-06-01星期二的 16:18 +0800，xiaofeng写道：
> Hi, all,
>
> My name is Xiaofeng, I am using Fedora for the first time since Fedora
> 13. Currently I work on RHEL like distributions for C++ development, I
> am willing to join the fedora packager group, especially the epel
> group.
Welcome! You can star
Adam Williamson writes:
> [...]
> But some other channels that are not Fedora channels, but which a lot
> of Fedora people are interested in, decided to move, or at least to
> tell people that they also had a channel on the new network. Then
> Freenode peremptorily took over those channels for po
On Tue, 1 Jun 2021 at 10:14, Richard Fearn wrote:
>
> > Note that your queries did not check for BuildRequires, since you did
> > not enable the foo-source repositories.
> > That would require "--enablerepo fedora-source --enablerepo
> > updates-source", or "--enablerepo rawhide-source" on rawhide
> Note that your queries did not check for BuildRequires, since you did
> not enable the foo-source repositories.
> That would require "--enablerepo fedora-source --enablerepo
> updates-source", or "--enablerepo rawhide-source" on rawhide.
Thanks Fabio - I knew I would get something wrong with tha
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 6:55 PM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
> > If I intend to use Matrix exclusively, do I still need to register on
> libera.chat, in order to participate in Fedora rooms?
>
> I think if you want to show up on the IRC side with your expected IRC
> nick (for example, for IRC meetings,
Hi, all,
My name is Xiaofeng, I am using Fedora for the first time since Fedora 13.
Currently I work on RHEL like distributions for C++ development, I am
willing to join the fedora packager group, especially the epel group.
By now, I want to co-maintain the qt-creator for epel8, it does not work
On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 08:23:40AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 06:47:28PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> > Hi Richard
> >
> > Apparently I need a newer openssl to build mingw-python3-3.9.5. Do
> > you have any time to look into updating to mingw-openssl-1.1.1k? I'm
> >
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:44 PM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
> > Maybe it helps in Element Web, Settings, Preferences, to deactivate
> > "Show join/leave messages (invites/kicks/bans unaffected)"
>
> Thanks for the suggestion, but I already had that setting turned off for
> months.
>
> Weirdly enough,
On Mon, 31 May 2021 14:28:58 -0500 astoundingly, Justin Forbes
wrote:
> Third party drivers often can break on kernel rebases.
Thanks Justin!
Though all worked fine for quite a while, after your posting I removed the
amdgpu package, installed the testing kernel just for giggles, and stuff
Hi guys,
later today I will be rebasing the expat library to version 2.4.1.
This update should not change API in any way, but still i want to give you
a heads up.
In case you encounter any issue, please let me know.
Sincerely, tkorbar.
___
devel mailing
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210530.0):
ID: 899750 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On 01. 06. 21 5:42, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 1:12 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 17. 05. 21 21:57, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
Hello,
Next week I'm going to update package hamcrest in Fedora rawhide from
version 1.3 to version 2.2.
The proposed update contains an API change th
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 06:47:28PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi Richard
>
> Apparently I need a newer openssl to build mingw-python3-3.9.5. Do
> you have any time to look into updating to mingw-openssl-1.1.1k? I'm
> not really familiar with the situation of all downstream patches to
> be comfort
44 matches
Mail list logo
