No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
7 of 43 required tests failed, 8 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 13/194 (x86_64), 12/133 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed i
On Thu, 2021-05-27 at 01:07 +, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
> for Fedora 35 Rawhide 20210526.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
> nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 35 Rawhide 20210526.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Wed, 2021-05-26 at 16:59 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 5:30 AM Peter Boy wrote:
> > > Am 26.05.2021 um 08:51 schrieb Chris Murphy <
> > > li...@colorremedies.com>:
> > > What controversial discussion is being referenced? Currently before
> > > us
> > > is a proposal to sw
the assumption that all of those several million
people will want to print from anything with a CPU ("whatever computing
devices one uses") or that that is even the common case.
There's been no assumption that "all" want any-one-thing.
As for common, print-from-any-device-you-use is comm
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Mon, 24 May 2021 at 22:30, Kevin Kofler via devel <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>> Solomon Peachy wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 01:27:03AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
>> >> I do not see how that is the common use case. Why would I w
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 12:04 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FedoraCloudBtrfsByDefault
>
> == Summary ==
>
> For cloud installs of Fedora, we want to provide advanced file system
> features to users in a transparent fashion. Thus, we are changing the
> file system
On 5/26/21 3:47 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 5/14/21 5:20 AM, Serge Guelton wrote:
Hi folks,
we're preparing an update of the LLVM package from 12.0.0rc1 to 12.0.0.
In addition the package the llvm team maintain, the following packages needs a
rebuild:
annobin-0:9.65
bindgen-0:0.57.0
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 5:30 AM Peter Boy wrote:
> > Am 26.05.2021 um 08:51 schrieb Chris Murphy :
> > What controversial discussion is being referenced? Currently before us
> > is a proposal to switch to Btrfs for Cloud edition.
>
> I’m quite sure you know that discussion. Part to it was Red Hat’
On 5/14/21 5:20 AM, Serge Guelton wrote:
Hi folks,
we're preparing an update of the LLVM package from 12.0.0rc1 to 12.0.0.
In addition the package the llvm team maintain, the following packages needs a
rebuild:
annobin-0:9.65
bindgen-0:0.57.0
clazy-0:1.9
doxygen-1:1.9.1
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 3:23 PM Jiri Kucera wrote:
>
> CC'ing Richard Fontana
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Jiri Kucera"
> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> >
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2021 4:15:21 PM
> > Subject: [LEGAL] License field not match the content of
On 5/26/21 4:47 PM, Solomon Peachy wrote:
But disabling mDNS altogether might cause undesired regerssions elsewhere.
Sure. Particularly if you don't set up your /etc/nsswitch.conf correctly.
Hence the 'YMMV'.
In general, we assume zero-trust and avoid enabling auto-anything. We add
trust a
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 04:41:27PM -0400, PGNet Dev wrote:
> On 5/26/21 4:28 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
> > > You have always had (and always will) have that choice; the ability to
> > > disable automatic printer discovery has been present since discovery was
> > > added with CUPS 1.2 (released back
On 5/26/21 4:28 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
You have always had (and always will) have that choice; the ability to
disable automatic printer discovery has been present since discovery was
added with CUPS 1.2 (released back in 2006!)
I'll have to see if I can find that option. Thanks for the hint.
Solomon Peachy wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 08:15:46PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> > And I always try to avoid using protocols that assume that the local
> > link is secure. That's one of the reasons why my printer is connected by
> > USB, and I would like to continue to have that choice.
>
CC'ing Richard Fontana
- Original Message -
> From: "Jiri Kucera"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2021 4:15:21 PM
> Subject: [LEGAL] License field not match the content of eigen3-devel?
>
> Hello,
>
> I do some investigation of eigen3-dev
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 08:15:46PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> And I always try to avoid using protocols that assume that the local
> link is secure. That's one of the reasons why my printer is connected by
> USB, and I would like to continue to have that choice.
You have always had (and always
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> The truth is that most people know about it, and have decided that they can
> go 'meh' and keep living.
I am well aware that most people don't think for a second about computer
security. I see examples every day. They tend to begin caring after they
find out that they
Solomon Peachy wrote:
> Those that do appear show up as "queuename at host" or
> "mfg_model_hostname"
I can trust that they always contain either the string " at " or two
underscores? Or is that just what well-behaved printers do, while an
attacker can name their fake printer however they want?
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 2:01 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
> Due to a change in SELinux for Fedora 34 (I can't find the link right
> now), the policy for fail2ban needs to be updated[1] but the changes are a
> little bit beyond my understanding of SELinux.
>
> Any help or pointers from an expert?
>
Hi R
Hello,
I do some investigation of eigen3-devel package and found out that there are
some files distributed under the Minpack license:
- /usr/include/eigen3/unsupported/Eigen/src/LevenbergMarquardt/LMcovar.h
- /usr/include/eigen3/unsupported/Eigen/src/LevenbergMarquardt/LMonestep.h
- /usr/include/
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 05:44:28AM -0400, Jiri Kucera wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Richard Shaw"
> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> >
> > Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2021 2:06:34 PM
> > Subject: Unannounced soname bump: libgta
> >
> > Looks like a long standin
On 5/26/21 7:05 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
Hi Robert,
On 5/24/21 2:39 PM, Robert Marcano via devel wrote:
On 5/24/21 3:29 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
Devices which currently depend on a deprecated functionality -
printer drivers and raw queues - will need a printer application once
the deprecated
pypy and pypy3 license metadata have been corrected from:
MIT and Python and UCD
to:
MIT and Python and UCD and BSD and (ASL 2.0 or BSD)
# PyPy is MIT
# Python standard library is Python
# pypy/module/unicodedata is UCD
# Bundled pycparser is is BSD
# Bundled pycparser.ply is BSD
# Bundled
> Am 26.05.2021 um 08:51 schrieb Chris Murphy :
>
> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 5:52 PM Peter Boy wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Am 25.05.2021 um 23:20 schrieb Neal Gompa :
>>> Cloud images never had such separation. It was always one big ext4
>>> partition. With Btrfs, we can introduce subvolumes so user data
Hi Robert,
On 5/24/21 2:39 PM, Robert Marcano via devel wrote:
> On 5/24/21 3:29 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>>
>> Devices which currently depend on a deprecated functionality -
>> printer drivers and raw queues - will need a printer application once
>> the deprecated functionality is removed from CU
Hi Przemek,
thank you for trying the driverless and the investigation!
Would you mind checking if the similar bug isn't already reported on
Avahi in Fedora and reporting it if not? Maybe Avahi maintainers can
point out what is the best for debugging Avahi.
I recommend setting debug logging on av
- Original Message -
> From: "Richard Shaw"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2021 2:06:34 PM
> Subject: Unannounced soname bump: libgta
>
> Looks like a long standing FTBFS was finally fixed, after previous version
> update attempts failed an
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:01 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 22 2021 at 09:23:23 AM +1000, Bob Hepple
> wrote:
> > I have no idea how significant this might be, but perhaps this should
> > be discussed more publicly.
>
> Use containers? Ship your own glib as a static lib? I'm impress
> On Saturday, July 4, 2020 6:44:55 AM MST Solomon Peachy wrote:
>
> There are still new systems built today that only support BIOS, and vendors
> providing systems factory-configured for BIOS boot on hardware that does
> support UEFI. There is no 2TB upper limit on drive sizes as a result of
>
On Tue, 25 May 2021 17:00:31 -0500
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Sat, May 22 2021 at 09:23:23 AM +1000, Bob Hepple
> wrote:
> > I have no idea how significant this might be, but perhaps this
> > should be discussed more publicly.
>
> Use containers? Ship your own glib as a static lib? I'm im
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210525.0):
ID: 894666 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Wednesday, 26 May 2021 at 00:23, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 5:12 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tuesday, 25 May 2021 at 23:06, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > As of the 25th of May 2021, Fedora Linux 32 has reached its end of
> > > life f
33 matches
Mail list logo
