On 5/22/21 12:17 AM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>> It is a library for printer applications [1], not a substitute for CUPS.
>> CUPS is still present and is going to be.
>>
>> There will be more printer applications coming into Fedora
>> (ps-printer-app f.e.) and one alrea
Hi Vitaly,
Openprinting community (which I am a part of the community) plans to
have printer applications for printer drivers shipped in Ubuntu
implemented during Google Summer of Code [1] by multiple students.
foo2zjs is in Ubuntu too, so there's a plan to implement a printer
application for it.
What do you get for:
sudo systemctl status earlyoom.service
I see:
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/earlyoom.service;
disabled; vendor preset: disabled)
Chris Murphy
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
On 23.05.2021 19:05, Neal Gompa wrote:
Actually, it is. That trigger is wrong:
It should work fine.
Version in Fedora 33: earlyoom-1.6.2-1.fc33.
Version in Fedora 34: earlyoom-1.6.2-3.fc34.
The trigger is: earlyoom < 1.6.2-3
It will be automatically executed on F34 upgrade. I tested it in VM
On 23.05.2021 19:05, Neal Gompa wrote:
Actually, it is. That trigger is wrong:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/earlyoom/pull-request/3
It should be instead: %triggerun -- fedora-release-common < 34
Should I fix this?
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 12:45 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 23.05.2021 16:00, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > This is a bug and needs to be fixed.
>
> This is not an earlyoom's bug:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/earlyoom/blob/rawhide/f/earlyoom.spec#_44
>
Actually, it is. That trigger
El dom, 23 may 2021 a las 13:10, Sergio Belkin ()
escribió:
>
>
> El dom, 23 may 2021 a las 12:58, Neal Gompa ()
> escribió:
>
>> On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 11:54 AM Sergio Belkin wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> > I was reading the systemd-oomd documentation and it says:
>> > «More precisely, only cgroups w
On 23.05.2021 18:38, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
I still had earlyoom installed too.
This is intended.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-l
On 23.05.2021 16:00, Neal Gompa wrote:
This is a bug and needs to be fixed.
This is not an earlyoom's bug:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/earlyoom/blob/rawhide/f/earlyoom.spec#_44
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel
Okay, so I asked here:
https://discourse.gnome.org/t/does-gnome-shell-use-gtk3-or-gtk4/6530
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.
On Sun, May 23 2021 at 11:57:03 AM -0400, Neal Gompa
wrote:
Do you have systemd-oomd-defaults installed? That's where the oomd
configuration is stored.
Hm, I did not have this installed after upgrading to F34, and I still
had earlyoom installed too.
_
El dom, 23 may 2021 a las 12:58, Neal Gompa () escribió:
> On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 11:54 AM Sergio Belkin wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I was reading the systemd-oomd documentation and it says:
> > «More precisely, only cgroups with memory.oom.group set to 1 and leaf
> cgroup nodes are eligible candidat
On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 11:54 AM Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I was reading the systemd-oomd documentation and it says:
> «More precisely, only cgroups with memory.oom.group set to 1 and leaf cgroup
> nodes are eligible candidates.»
> (https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd-oo
Hi,
I was reading the systemd-oomd documentation and it says:
«More precisely, only cgroups with memory.oom.group set to 1 and leaf
cgroup nodes are eligible candidates.»
(https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd-oomd.html)
However I haven't found any "memory.oom.group" file set to
On Wed, 2021-05-19 at 14:59 +0100, Pete Walter wrote:
> I am in the process of updating icu from 67.1 to 69.1 in rawhide. This comes
> with a soname bump, but as usual, I'm including a compat package providing
> the old soname to not break the world while the rebuilds are in progress, so
> no rawhi
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
7 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 21/194 (x86_64), 18/133 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20
El dom, 23 may 2021 a las 11:01, Neal Gompa () escribió:
> On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 9:59 AM Sergio Belkin wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I've upgraded from F33 to F34 using dnf plugin and I've found that both
> systemd-oomd and earlyoom service are running:
> >
> > systemctl is-active earlyoom.service sys
On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 9:59 AM Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I've upgraded from F33 to F34 using dnf plugin and I've found that both
> systemd-oomd and earlyoom service are running:
>
> systemctl is-active earlyoom.service systemd-oomd.service
> active
> active
>
> and:
>
> systemctl is-active
Hi,
I've upgraded from F33 to F34 using dnf plugin and I've found that both
systemd-oomd and earlyoom service are running:
systemctl is-active earlyoom.service systemd-oomd.service
active
active
and:
systemctl is-active earlyoom.service systemd-oomd.service
active
active
Is this behaviour expec
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210522.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210523.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 32
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 50.24 KiB
Size of dropped packages
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210522.0):
ID: 892302 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/892302
ID: 892303 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qc
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210522.0):
ID: 892292 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210522.0):
ID: 892276 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
23 matches
Mail list logo
