On Fri, 2021-05-14 at 06:06 +0200, Michal Srb wrote:
>
> I thought, under the hood, the button is just telling Bodhi to send the
> "bodhi.update.status.testing.koji-build-group.build.complete" [1] message
> again, so all CI systems listening should trigger? This isn't the case for
> openQA?
>
> T
On Thursday, 13 May 2021 18:50:33 EEST PGNet Dev wrote:
> On 5/13/21 10:48 AM, Juha Tuomala wrote:
> > Virtual machine installation is hopefully a special use case and majority
> > of installations are bare metal end users.
>
> hardly.
>
> here,
Sure. But this is devel list. Are developers th
Hi Neal,
Neal Gompa writes:
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:44 PM Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, May 09, 2021 at 12:32:00AM -0500, Greg Hellings wrote:
>> > I may be hair-brained to do this, but I've put together an installer for
>> > Fedora on WSL.
>>
>> Hi Greg! Not hair-brained at all --
Hello,
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 2:19 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-05-13 at 19:29 +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> > > Hey folks!
> > >
> > > Just wanted to flag up that, now the new Bodhi version has been
> > > deployed to production, critpath updates are gated on openQA test
>
On Thu, 2021-05-13 at 19:29 +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> > Hey folks!
> >
> > Just wanted to flag up that, now the new Bodhi version has been
> > deployed to production, critpath updates are gated on openQA test
> > results. If any openQA test for your critpath update failed, the
> > gat
hi,
On 5/13/21 6:06 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
mock -r fedora-34-x86_64 --rebuild
lua-resty-luajit2-git.HEAD-0.pgnd_20210513_212639.fc34.src.rpm
also fails in my machine, %forgesetup -z 0 is where it fails
hm. whereas a non-isolated, local rpmbuild works, as per my OP,
a *mock* build here fa
mock -r fedora-34-x86_64 --rebuild
lua-resty-luajit2-git.HEAD-0.pgnd_20210513_212639.fc34.src.rpm
also fails in my machine, %forgesetup -z 0 is where it fails, have you a
different or custom /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.forge ?
On Thu, 2021-05-13 at 17:43 -0400, PGNet Dev wrote:
I've a pack
I've a package .spec, that uses forgemeta macros, that builds locally just fine
on F34.
Same spec @ COPR, F34 chroot, fails.
Something's either missing on my end, or broken @COPR. Likely obvious pebkac,
but I'm not seeing it.
Any insights as to why the same spec, @COPR, is failing would be a
Hi Kevin,
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 10:55 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Did you by chance add them to the update during the upgrade this
> morning? (starting at 10UTC)? It doesn't look like bodhi did the right
> thing with the tagging here... I can try and correct things.
It was towards the end of the
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 10:09:32PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can anyone help me figure out what's going on with this update?
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-b8551abae2
>
> It says that the side-tag is not among a bunch of other tags. It does
> exist tho
Hello,
Can anyone help me figure out what's going on with this update?
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-b8551abae2
It says that the side-tag is not among a bunch of other tags. It does
exist though.
What I did was build a package and its dependencies in side-tags for
F33, F34
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 05:48:07PM +0300, Juha Tuomala wrote:
> Virtual machine installation is hopefully a special use case and majority of
> installations are bare metal end users.
Most likely the exact opposite of this, but I don't have the numbers.
(On _my_ systems it's likely to be 100:1 vi
> Hey folks!
>
> Just wanted to flag up that, now the new Bodhi version has been
> deployed to production, critpath updates are gated on openQA test
> results. If any openQA test for your critpath update failed, the gating
> status will be marked as 'failed' and you will not be able to push it
> s
> Am 12.05.2021 um 22:35 schrieb Ben Cotton :
>
> == Summary ==
> Since 2019 the Anaconda installer GUI hosted an option called "Allow
> SSH root login with password", that made it possible to enable
> password based root logins over SSH on the installed system. ... And
> after two years of tran
Hey folks!
Just wanted to flag up that, now the new Bodhi version has been
deployed to production, critpath updates are gated on openQA test
results. If any openQA test for your critpath update failed, the gating
status will be marked as 'failed' and you will not be able to push it
stable.
Waiver
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 9:46 AM Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2021-05-12 at 16:35 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > == Benefit to Fedora ==
> > This change makes the Fedora systems installed by Anaconda more secure
> > from remote password guessing attacks targeting the root account as it
> > would no
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:44 PM Matthew Miller
wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 09, 2021 at 12:32:00AM -0500, Greg Hellings wrote:
> > I may be hair-brained to do this, but I've put together an installer for
> > Fedora on WSL.
>
> Hi Greg! Not hair-brained at all -- this is awesome!
>
A couple of years ba
On Sun, May 09, 2021 at 12:32:00AM -0500, Greg Hellings wrote:
> I may be hair-brained to do this, but I've put together an installer for
> Fedora on WSL.
Hi Greg! Not hair-brained at all -- this is awesome!
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
___
On 5/13/21 10:48 AM, Juha Tuomala wrote:
Virtual machine installation is hopefully a special use case and majority of
installations are bare metal end users.
hardly.
here, for any given single bare-metal install, between cloud & local VMs, there
are typically *many*/*frequent* VM installs --
On Thursday, 13 May 2021 15:11:19 EEST Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> > Make a plugin interface for adding additional methods to obtain public
> > keys as there are a lot different sources for those. Fedora itself has
> > tools for PKI and public key based security and it would be quite low
> > hanging f
On 5/13/21 10:09 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Not everyone is installing a public facing server. On my isolated,
non-networked test instances I want to put up a short-lived VM with a
root password of "123456" quickly and no user account, and this option
lets me do that.
this^^ is a _very_ fre
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 04:35:44PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_Rootpw_SSH_From_Installer
I don't understand why you want to remove this, since it defaults to
off. Sure, add a warning if you like (probably there's one already?)
Not everyone is installing
On Wed, 2021-05-12 at 16:35 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> == Benefit to Fedora ==
> This change makes the Fedora systems installed by Anaconda more secure
> from remote password guessing attacks targeting the root account as it
> would no longer be possible to configure a system that allows root to
>
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 10/194 (x86_64), 9/133 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in F
Hello,
I have built rpkg-3.rc2 (package sources:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpkg-util) into rawhide yesterday.
It should be now available for installation.
It is a complete rewrite of version 2. It aims to be a tool with
minimal deps that allows people to easily transform git repositories
On 5/13/21 12:13 PM, Juha Tuomala wrote:
Make a plugin interface for adding additional methods to obtain public keys as
there are a lot different sources for those. Fedora itself has tools for PKI
and public key based security and it would be quite low hanging fruit to fill
the gap between those
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210512.n.2
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210513.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 12
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:230.11
On Wednesday, 12 May 2021 23:35:44 EEST Ben Cotton wrote:
> * it has been suggested that making it easier to import SSH keys from
> popular code hosting platforms (Pagure, GitHub, GitLab, etc.) could
> provide a nice alternative to the dropped option -
Make a plugin interface for adding additiona
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210512.0):
ID: 885660 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/885660
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests comp
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210512.0):
ID: 885644 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210512.0):
ID: 885628 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
31 matches
Mail list logo
