On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 4:42 PM Lyes Saadi wrote:
>
> I think I realized what went wrong: I compressed my filesystem _after_
> already having done some snapshots. I think it then duplicated all my
> files and basically filled my filesystem... And I did
Yeah defragmentation unshares shared extents
I think I realized what went wrong: I compressed my filesystem _after_
already having done some snapshots. I think it then duplicated all my
files and basically filled my filesystem... And I did
Sorry for that! I'm happy to be wrong at least. And thank you for this
great answer!
Le 19/04/2
Lyes Saadi wrote on Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:56:51PM +0100:
> It's a bit late to ask this question, but it emerged when I noticed that
> after upgrading my PC to Silverblue 34 and after compressing manually my
> files, and doing some snapshots, rpm-ostree began complaining about the
> absence of fre
Hello!
It's a bit late to ask this question, but it emerged when I noticed that
after upgrading my PC to Silverblue 34 and after compressing manually my
files, and doing some snapshots, rpm-ostree began complaining about the
absence of free space... While compsize reported that I used only
8
On Mon, 2021-04-19 at 18:24 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 01:12:07PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Mon, 2021-04-19 at 12:02 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 06:00:38PM +0800, Kairui Song wrote:
> > > > 2. LUKS2 prefers Argon2 as the key d
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/127 (aarch64), 2/189 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210418.n.0):
ID: 861097 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/861097
ID: 861148 Test: aarch6
wlroots-0.13 is now available in rawhide.
The compatibility issues are resolved via `wlroots0.12` package which
will be installed on update if there is anything that depends on
`libwlroots.so.7`. No rebuilds are necessary.
If your package depends on the old wlroots API or hardware support, you
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 01:12:07PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-04-19 at 12:02 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 06:00:38PM +0800, Kairui Song wrote:
> > > 2. LUKS2 prefers Argon2 as the key derivation function, designed to
> > > use a lot of memory. kdump is e
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 01:12:07PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-04-19 at 12:02 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 06:00:38PM +0800, Kairui Song wrote:
> > > 2. LUKS2 prefers Argon2 as the key derivation function, designed to
> > > use a lot of memory. kdump is e
On Mon, 2021-04-19 at 12:02 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 06:00:38PM +0800, Kairui Song wrote:
> > 2. LUKS2 prefers Argon2 as the key derivation function, designed to
> > use a lot of memory. kdump is expected to use a minimal amount of
> > memory. Users will have to re
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 9/189 (x86_64), 18/127 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210418.n.0):
ID: 860505 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://open
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 03:35:40PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 09:11:19AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 4:13 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > What about the unused "qa contact field"? Kevin suggested dropping
> > > qa-extra
I'll fix those as well.
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, April 19, 2021 9:13 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 05/04/2021 à 23:19, Gwyn Ciesla via devel a écrit :
Updates are now in flight for kst, libASL, openmeeg, and vips, for f34 and f33.
gtatool is retired and FTBFS, so I left it alone.
Looks like the same happens today in Fedora 32
Remi
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
--
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 09:11:19AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 4:13 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > What about the unused "qa contact field"? Kevin suggested dropping
> > qa-extras [1], but it never went anywhere, afaics?
> >
> Good idea. I have a few other B
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 03:48:04PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2021-04-16 at 16:31 +, David Cantrell wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Change/CyrusSaslBerkeleyDBtoGdbm
>
> == Summary ==
> cyrus-sasl package was built with libdb requirement, now it is replaced by
gdbm.
>
> == Owne
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 4:13 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> What about the unused "qa contact field"? Kevin suggested dropping
> qa-extras [1], but it never went anywhere, afaics?
>
Good idea. I have a few other BZ cleanup things I want to look at
post-release. I'll add this to the list
OLD: Fedora-34-20210418.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210419.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Hello everyone,
we successfully pushed explicit python3-setuptools BuildRequire to all
affected packages. As mentioned in the Change proposal, there is no need to
rebuild them, it will be done together with Python 3.10. mass rebuild.
Regards,
Tomáš Hrnčiar
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 2:50 PM Tomas H
On 19.04.2021 13:02, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I'm just going to sympathise with you rather than provide a good
answer here ... We had the same problem in libguestfs where Argon2
used too much memory for our small appliance when opening LUKS2 disks.
We had to simply increase the amount of memory
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210418.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210419.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 63
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.41 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On 18/04/21 23:38 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
On 2021-04-15 6:33 a.m., Jonathan Wakely wrote:
The error for this build is completely different to the errors you
showed above:
/builddir/build/BUILD/LuxCore-luxcorerender_v2.5/include/luxrays/utils/utils.h:40:18:
error: 'std::std' has not be
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 06:00:38PM +0800, Kairui Song wrote:
> 2. LUKS2 prefers Argon2 as the key derivation function, designed to
> use a lot of memory. kdump is expected to use a minimal amount of
> memory. Users will have to reserve a huge amount of memory for kdump
> to work (eg. 1G reserve for
On 19.04.2021 04:28, Qiyu Yan wrote:
What if %autosetup -n Foo\ Bar-%{version} ?
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.fqLJUo
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/vitaly/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ cd /home/vitaly/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ rm -rf Foo
+ /usr/bin/gzip -dc /home/vitaly/rpmbuild/SOURCES/Foo.Bar-1.0.0.tar.gz
On 18.04.2021 22:46, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
What tarball is this? Because that sort of cutesy tarball name is
well, not going to work well for any standard release software.
JetBrains Rider for example. Tarball name:
"JetBrains.Rider-%{version}.tar.gz", directory name - "JetBrains
Rider
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210418.0):
ID: 860415 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
PETSc-3.15 is built in side-tag f35-build-side-40112
Please, rebuild your own related package.
On 4/10/21 7:26 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
Hi all.
PETSc 3.15 is coming in Rawhide branch.
Release notes: https://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/documentation/changes/315.html
Dependencies in Fedora:
$
Hi all,
I'm currently trying to add kdump support for systemd with full-disk
LUKS encryption. vmcores contain sensitive data so they should also be
protected, and network dumps sometimes are not available. So kdump has
to open the LUKS encrypted device in the kdump environment.
I'm using systemd/
On 19. 04. 21 10:52, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 03:12:34PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Good Morning Everyone,
The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking them to
either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS
matc
Hi everyone,
ARC team - that is me, Vipul and Mark, are looking to figure out
possible ways how we could replace our current PDC [0] whose project
has gone unmaintained for years [1].
We plan to share what we find out in our
https://fedora-arc.readthedocs.io/en/latest/pdc/index.html
It would be
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 03:12:34PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking them to
> either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS
> matches an existing bugzilla account.
>
> H
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210418.0):
ID: 860295 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 3:30 PM David Cantrell wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:26:24AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >Hijacking this thread originally about
> >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271
> >
> >What is the current thinking in Fedora about always running
> >"autor
33 matches
Mail list logo
