On Fri, 2021-04-16 at 15:49 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have mentioned previously on this list that I want to update
> ocaml-ocamlgraph to version 2.0.0. It has two consumers in Fedora:
> frama-c (which is ready to move to the new version) and ocaml-dose3
> (which is not).
>
> Ther
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 7/37 (x86_64)
ID: 858649 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/858649
ID: 858653 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/test
Hi all,
I have mentioned previously on this list that I want to update
ocaml-ocamlgraph to version 2.0.0. It has two consumers in Fedora:
frama-c (which is ready to move to the new version) and ocaml-dose3
(which is not).
There is a new upstream location for ocaml-dose3:
https://gitlab.com/irill
On Fri, 2021-04-16 at 16:31 +, David Cantrell wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Change/CyrusSaslBerkeleyDBtoGdbm
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > cyrus-sasl package was built with libdb requirement, now it is replaced by
> > gdbm.
> >
> > == Owner ==
> > * Name: [[User:Dbelyavs| Dmitry Bely
Let's keep our streak alive and hit target date #1 by being go on Thursday!
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. sddm — logout after switch returns the user to console instead of
sddm — ON_QA
ACTION: collective to decide if FEDORA-2021-87d6b51834 is a suffici
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 04:49:46PM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 4:31 PM David Cantrell wrote:
2) I'm curious why GDBM was chosen instead of something like sqlite.
I believe sasldb only supports gdbm and
ndbm as alternatives to bdb.
Ooops, my mistake. I see:
--wit
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 01:41:41PM -, Zach Oglesby wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 9:19 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon
> > > Huh. That still exists? What a throwback!
> >
> > I sent a tweet in zoglesby's direction. He posted about a week ago, so
> > hopefully he'll see it.
> Fixed
Thanks!
___
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 6:29 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a dependency that is a C++ library for SIMD (called highway).
> This library requires SSE4 as its minimum required instruction set
> ("Supported targets: SSE4, AVX2, AVX-512, NEON (ARMv7 and v8), WASM
> SIMD."). Howe
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/189 (x86_64), 4/127 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210415.n.0):
ID: 858248 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/858248
ID: 858470 Test: aar
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 4:31 PM David Cantrell wrote:
> 2) I'm curious why GDBM was chosen instead of something like sqlite.
I believe sasldb only supports gdbm and
ndbm as alternatives to bdb.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 02:04:53PM +, Alessio wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-04-16 at 15:25 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Good Morning Everyone,
> >
> > When we rolled out the new AAA solution a few weeks ago, some
> > accounts have not
> > been migrated:
>
> OT
> Out of curiosity: what happens
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Change/CyrusSaslBerkeleyDBtoGdbm
>
> == Summary ==
> cyrus-sasl package was built with libdb requirement, now it is replaced by
> gdbm.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:Dbelyavs| Dmitry Belyavskiy]]
> * Email: dbelyavs(a)redhat.com
>
>
>
> == Detailed Descript
Hello,
I have a dependency that is a C++ library for SIMD (called highway).
This library requires SSE4 as its minimum required instruction set
("Supported targets: SSE4, AVX2, AVX-512, NEON (ARMv7 and v8), WASM
SIMD."). However the minimum for Fedora is SSE2. Am I still allowed to
package thi
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 3:40 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> I will disable the flag on Friday 16 April unless there's a good
> reason to keep it.
>
This is done. Farewell `fedora_requires_release_note` and long live
https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/release-notes/issues !
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Senio
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 8:11 AM Nicola Sella wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am sorry for the issue, that's my fault.
>
> I tried to release the whole stack yesterday (Thursday), but I bumped into
> some unexpected failures (unrelated to this) during the scratch build for
> dnf-plugins-core and other pa
On Tuesday, April 13, 2021 3:50:18 PM CEST Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Neal Gompa:
>
> > As I said previously[1], I think doing autoconf upgrades would be less
> > painful if we always did that.
> >
> > [1]:
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZZG
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 1:39 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I'm getting emails saying I need to visit:
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/ocaml-devel.lists.fedoraproject.org/held_messages
>
> to approve messages, but when I go there (after logging in) I only see:
>
> 403 Forbidden
Th
On Fri, 2021-04-16 at 15:25 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> When we rolled out the new AAA solution a few weeks ago, some
> accounts have not
> been migrated:
OT
Out of curiosity: what happens if I register a new account on the new
AAA with one of these usernames?
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 9:19 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Huh. That still exists? What a throwback!
>
> I sent a tweet in zoglesby's direction. He posted about a week ago, so
> hopefully he'll see it.
Fixed
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedo
OLD: Fedora-34-20210415.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210416.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 1
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 9:19 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> zoglesby is maintainer of rpms/publican-fedora
>
Huh. That still exists? What a throwback!
>
> Does anyone know how to contact them?
>
I sent a tweet in zoglesby's direction. He posted about a week ago, so
hopefully he'll see it.
--
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:26:24AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Hijacking this thread originally about
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271
What is the current thinking in Fedora about always running
"autoreconf -i" during builds that use autotools?
I think we are likely to
Good Morning Everyone,
When we rolled out the new AAA solution a few weeks ago, some accounts have not
been migrated:
- Accounts that have been set inactive by their owner
- Accounts that are disabled
- Accounts marked as spam
This resulted in some packager accounts not being migrated.
As a conse
Good Morning Everyone,
The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking them to
either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS
matches an existing bugzilla account.
Having a bugzilla account is mandatory per:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the
Hello,
I am sorry for the issue, that's my fault.
I tried to release the whole stack yesterday (Thursday), but I bumped
into some unexpected failures (unrelated to this) during the scratch
build for dnf-plugins-core and other packages, so I decided to wait
until today for the plugins as I tho
Hello everyone,
I write this mail to let you know about the very recent developments that took
place which led to the revamp of the previous Fedora Websites, as the new
Fedora Websites and Apps team as well as to invite you to our weekly meetings
that helps shape our objective. You can find mor
On 15.04.2021 23:05, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
Which one exactly is more than 100 GiB?
Chromium.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@l
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210415.0):
ID: 858087 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 10:27:58PM +0200, Dan Čermák wrote:
> Dear OCaml devs & packagers,
>
> thanks to the work of smoodge and the infra team, I am proud to announce
> the resurrection of the ocaml-devel list!
>
> It should be now available again for subscription in hyperkitty [1]
I'm getting
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210415.0):
ID: 858073 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
30 matches
Mail list logo
