On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 04:32:29PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> == Detailed Description ==
> This change switches the default backend Key-Value DB used by sasldb
> plugin from BerkeleyDB to GDBM and provides a migration tool for
> automatic conversion from old to new format.
To clarify: will both ba
On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 15:51 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 5:33 PM Michel Alexandre Salim
> wrote:
> > ok, the camlzip OPAM module still uses Makefiles to install, and
> > rather
> > than trying to make sure I override the right environment variables
> > to
> > get it to build
On Thu, 2021-04-15 at 23:00 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 15. 04. 21 22:21, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
>
> >
> > In this case, presumably only `rxvt` fits the bill here as it is
> > causing a conflict, so... perhaps I should add it to `fedora-
> > obsolete-
> > packages` for F32, F33, and F3
Huzzah!
On Thu, 2021-04-15 at 22:27 +0200, Dan Čermák wrote:
> Dear OCaml devs & packagers,
>
> thanks to the work of smoodge and the infra team, I am proud to
> announce
> the resurrection of the ocaml-devel list!
>
> It should be now available again for subscription in hyperkitty [1]
>
Thanks
On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 13:12 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I'm sure there are others of you out there like me who are using
> Github Actions for continuous integration. Recently, I got tired of
> updating my CI workflow definition every time a new Fedora release
> branched, so I wrote a reusable
On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 10:45 +0200, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
...
> We are looking for maintainers of Fedora Linux packages who'd be
> interested in being early adopters and give us feedback during the
> development process. You don't need to do any coding unless you want
> to :)
I'd like to register in
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 4/189 (x86_64), 7/127 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210414.n.0):
ID: 857601 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/857601
ID: 8
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 5:05 PM J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 04:53:06PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 14.04.2021 16:27, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> > > Could you, please, be more constructive and say what the actual
> > > problems are for you with such repositories
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 04:53:06PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 14.04.2021 16:27, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> > Could you, please, be more constructive and say what the actual
> > problems are for you with such repositories?
>
> 1. Some upstream repositories (Qt, Chromium, Linux kernel)
On 15. 04. 21 22:21, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
From looking at fedora-obsolete-packages' various branches, it looks
like packages are only meant to be listed for one release cycle, and
then removed (so the Rawhide branch's list of packages will get removed
in F36).
Actually, it should be t
Dear OCaml devs & packagers,
thanks to the work of smoodge and the infra team, I am proud to announce
the resurrection of the ocaml-devel list!
It should be now available again for subscription in hyperkitty [1]
Cheers,
Dan
Footnotes:
[1]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ocaml-
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 12/189 (x86_64), 10/127 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210414.n.0):
ID: 857312 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit
URL: htt
From looking at fedora-obsolete-packages' various branches, it looks
like packages are only meant to be listed for one release cycle, and
then removed (so the Rawhide branch's list of packages will get removed
in F36).
How do we handle packages that were not added to this in time? e.g.
when I dist
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 10:57:47 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 06:35:22PM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > Hiya,
> >
> > I'm trying to build a new package for rawhide but keep running into this
> > error on koji:
> >
> > Error:
> > Problem: package dnf-plugins-core-4.0.19-1.fc34.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 06:35:22PM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hiya,
>
> I'm trying to build a new package for rawhide but keep running into this
> error on koji:
>
> Error:
> Problem: package dnf-plugins-core-4.0.19-1.fc34.noarch requires
> python3-dnf-plugins-core = 4.0.19-1.fc34, but none of
See https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d90b379f35
On 4/15/21 7:35 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hiya,
I'm trying to build a new package for rawhide but keep running into this
error on koji:
Error:
Problem: package dnf-plugins-core-4.0.19-1.fc34.noarch requires
python3-dnf-plugins-
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 1:47 PM Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>
>
> On 14.04.21 10:45, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> > Good morning, I'd like to announce the creation of Fedora Source-git SIG:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Source-git
> >
> > Our main goal in the SIG right now is to establish a devel
Hiya,
I'm trying to build a new package for rawhide but keep running into this
error on koji:
Error:
Problem: package dnf-plugins-core-4.0.19-1.fc34.noarch requires
python3-dnf-plugins-core = 4.0.19-1.fc34, but none of the providers can be
installed
- package dnf-4.7.0-1.fc35.noarch conflict
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 11:38:15AM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 15.04.2021 07:22, Pavel Zhukov wrote:
> > There is (was?) bug in pagure which allows any Fedora package to
> > orphan any package in the distribution.
>
> Yes. This is not a bug, this is a critical vulnerability. It mus
On 4/15/21 1:24 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 04:04:21PM +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
On 4/14/21 3:28 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
I got a "pull request" for one of my packages and wanted to make some
changes to discuss with the submitter and see if we could merge it
back w
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 04:57:46PM +0200, Luna Jernberg wrote:
> Delayed another week:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/2UHYXZ6LDWEQ2EUEL3QUMV753JKEAUXZ/
To be clear, this isn't a "delay". Not yet at least. :)
--
Matthew Miller
Fedor
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 04:30:26PM +0200, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> Daniel, thank you for sharing your experience!
>
> More comments inline.
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 5:26 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote> > > 4. Some project have a weird git workflow between minor releases.
> I know at
> > > leas
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 8:52 PM Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>
>
> On 14.04.21 10:45, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> > Good morning, I'd like to announce the creation of Fedora Source-git SIG:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Source-git
> >
> > Our main goal in the SIG right now is to establish a devel
Daniel, thank you for sharing your experience!
More comments inline.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 5:26 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 04:53:06PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 14.04.2021 16:27, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> > > Could you, please, be more constructive
On 14/04/21 16:06 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Due to a possible change related to GCC, packages like openxr and
luxcorereneder failed to build with these errors:
I don't think there's any relevant change in GCC.
It looks like these packages simply fail to link with -lstdc++fs (or
they have
OLD: Fedora-34-20210414.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210415.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:7
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 4
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Am 11.04.21 um 07:27 schrieb Patrick Lang:
I just did a quick test with Fedora 34 beta on Hyper-V on Windows 10
version 2009, build 19042. These settings should work on Windows
Server 2016 and later too as far as I know. The live boot and install
worked as usual.
The hyperv_fb driver defaults
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 14:11, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 6:58 AM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 at 20:29, Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 1:38 PM Tomasz Torcz
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Dnia Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 01:12
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 34 Branched 20210415.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 6:58 AM Clement Verna wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 at 20:29, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 1:38 PM Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>> >
>> > Dnia Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 01:12:47PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher napisał(a):
>> > > Since I figured it might be use
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 04:04:21PM +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> On 4/14/21 3:28 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > I got a "pull request" for one of my packages and wanted to make some
> > changes to discuss with the submitter and see if we could merge it
> > back with those changes to the rawhid
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 02:38:40PM +0100, Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
> On 14/04/2021 14:28, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>
> > I added the following line to my .git/config at the end of the [remote
> > "origin"] section to be able to pull it:
> >
> > fetch = +refs/pull/*/head:refs/remotes/origin/pr/*
>
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 at 20:29, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 1:38 PM Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> >
> > Dnia Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 01:12:47PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher napisał(a):
> > > Since I figured it might be useful to others, I have made it available
> > > publicly. See the Mark
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210414.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210415.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 9
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 90
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 8.48 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On Do, 15.04.21 10:20, Luca Boccassi (bl...@debian.org) wrote:
> > I'm confused about this - I had put forth an idea for how to make rpm
> > create this when installing packages (so it works with older or third
> > party packages) but the same xattr could be created for any packaging
> > system. C
> On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 15:29 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> That's fair - if it were possible to get an fd during dump, we could
> use fgetxattr. If not, we can use /proc/$pid/exe - even when deleted
> you can interact with it:
>
> [malmond@malmond-x1 ~]$ ls -l /proc/$$/exe
> lrwx
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 11:52:40AM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 14.04.2021 17:19, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > That's not my experiance. The cases where I know of maintainers are
> > using a source-git model with Fedora / RHEL already, are doing so
> > precisely because it makes ong
Thanks to Rich for handling the builds.
The update is here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-3250e0b537
Stefan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 14.04.2021 17:19, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
That's not my experiance. The cases where I know of maintainers are
using a source-git model with Fedora / RHEL already, are doing so
precisely because it makes ongoing maint and rebasing way easier
than with dist-git, especially when there are a
On 15.04.2021 07:22, Pavel Zhukov wrote:
There is (was?) bug in pagure which allows any Fedora package to
orphan any package in the distribution.
Yes. This is not a bug, this is a critical vulnerability. It must be
fixed ASAP.
Reported 1 month ago and still not fixed.
Some co-maintainers c
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210414.0):
ID: 857254 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On 15. 04. 21 6:54, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 12. 04. 21 v 18:32 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
cura-lulzbot orphan, spot 6 weeks ago
fedora-jam-kde-theme jvlomax, orphan 0 weeks ago
gnome-desktop alexl, caolanm, fmuellner, gnome-sig, 0 weeks ago
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210414.0):
ID: 857083 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 08:58:51PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> Once this build has completed:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=65937416
>
> we'll be all done (except mpd).
That failed because of an unstable qemu test. I patched that
and submitted this new job:
44 matches
Mail list logo
