On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 02:52:44PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 21:40:21 -0700
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:46:15PM -0400, Susi Lehtola wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > > I've had a koji build running for over 6 hours, and the s390x build
> > > still ha
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 01:50:40PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>
> This split of fields in FreeIPA Web UI exists since FreeIPA 4.0 which
> was part of early RHEL 7 deliveries (the code for separate OTP field was
> added in 2014).
>
> There is nothing specific about it -- Noggin developers sim
Just to circle back to this (since I finally have time to catch up on
email), and since the ticket was private:
We hotfixed a fix for this right after it was noticed and now it's
in the upstream pagure-dist-git release as well.
Only admins of a package can orphan it.
Let us know if you see any
On Thu, 2021-04-01 at 14:56 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> 1. gdm — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942443 — NEW
> Login using password failed after upgrade to Fedora 34
>
> When a device has a fingerprint reader, but no fingerprints are
> enrolled, login fails on the default terminal
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 9:13 AM Łukasz Posadowski
wrote:
> Thank You. It should be really helpful with VM migrations, by
> tracking 3rd party packages and leftover dependencies. I'm trying to
> run it on RHEL 8 and it is working on Python 3.8, but not on 3.6. I
> think I'll have to rebuild python-
The F34 Final freeze begins on Tuesday 6 April.
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. sddm — logout after switch returns the user to console instead of sddm — NEW
ACTION: sddm maintainers to diagnose and fix issue
2. shim — include new bootloaders on Fedora 3
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 2:36 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 2:23 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SmallerContainerBase
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > This change proposes to remove 3 packages (sssd-client, util-linux,
> > shadow-utils) from the Contai
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 2:23 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SmallerContainerBase
>
> == Summary ==
> This change proposes to remove 3 packages (sssd-client, util-linux,
> shadow-utils) from the Container Base Image (including the minimal
> image). The Fedora Base Im
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SmallerContainerBase
== Summary ==
This change proposes to remove 3 packages (sssd-client, util-linux,
shadow-utils) from the Container Base Image (including the minimal
image). The Fedora Base Image is still quite large compared to other
distributions and th
Hi everyone,
I'm sending this to several lists that might care about the default
content license.
The Fedora Council is considering an update of the default *content*
license for Fedora contributions to the Creative Commons Attribute
Share-Alike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0) license. Currently, it is CC BY-
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/178 (x86_64), 6/127 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210330.n.0):
ID: 839705 Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/839705
ID: 839766 Test: aarch64 universal insta
OLD: Fedora-34-20210330.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210401.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:20
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 8
Dropped packages:9
Upgraded packages: 134
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 32.06 MiB
Size of dropped packages:173.43 MiB
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 8:37 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > Let's *not*. The amount of space saved in storage by putting socks and
> > underwear in their own separate drawers os often overwhelmed by the
> > space wasted in giving those drawers sides and a way to s
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 21:40:21 -0700
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:46:15PM -0400, Susi Lehtola wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > I've had a koji build running for over 6 hours, and the s390x build
> > still hasn't started. Are the s390x builders offline?
>
> Nope. However, a bunch of
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Let's *not*. The amount of space saved in storage by putting socks and
> underwear in their own separate drawers os often overwhelmed by the
> space wasted in giving those drawers sides and a way to slide in and
> out. In other words, it creates unnecessary overhead in ma
On 4/1/21 12:33 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 12:18 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
mailto:zbys...@in.waw.pl>> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:45:54PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 31. 03. 21 21:52, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >* Strict checking for unpackaged content
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210331.0):
ID: 839377 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On 01/04/21 12:36 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Jonathan Wakely:
On 30/03/21 17:13 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Due to an unplanned ABI break that I caused in libstdc++, I will soon
start to rebuild the packages listed below. This rebuild will remove
references to some symbols in libstdc++.s
On 01/04/21 11:09 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 30/03/21 17:13 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Due to an unplanned ABI break that I caused in libstdc++, I will soon
start to rebuild the packages listed below. This rebuild will remove
references to some symbols in libstdc++.so which do not work
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210331.0):
ID: 839363 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On ti, 30 maalis 2021, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 09:30:33AM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
Could you please explain where you want to do it? Noggin (Fedora
Accounts app) does handle the login itself, not FreeIPA. In the context
of what Fedora contributors interact with, FreeIP
* Jonathan Wakely:
> On 30/03/21 17:13 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>Due to an unplanned ABI break that I caused in libstdc++, I will soon
>>start to rebuild the packages listed below. This rebuild will remove
>>references to some symbols in libstdc++.so which do not work as
>>intended, and so w
On 30/03/21 17:13 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Due to an unplanned ABI break that I caused in libstdc++, I will soon
start to rebuild the packages listed below. This rebuild will remove
references to some symbols in libstdc++.so which do not work as
intended, and so will not be present in the fi
Kalev Lember wrote:
> I don't think there is anything wrong with having rpath to a private
> directory (/usr/lib64/samba) -- that's exactly what rpath is for, so that
> the app could find its private libraries that we don't want the whole
> world to have access to. What we should avoid is rpath to
On 01. 04. 21 10:47, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 01. 04. 21 v 0:54 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Hello:
Miro Hrončok wrote on 2021/04/01 6:45:
On 31. 03. 21 21:52, Ben Cotton wrote:
* Strict checking for unpackaged content in builds
> ...
* Many existing packages will fail to build due to the stric
Dne 01. 04. 21 v 0:54 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Hello:
Miro Hrončok wrote on 2021/04/01 6:45:
On 31. 03. 21 21:52, Ben Cotton wrote:
* Strict checking for unpackaged content in builds
> ...
* Many existing packages will fail to build due to the stricter
buildroot content checking. Fixing th
26 matches
Mail list logo
