On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 18:53, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I'll be updating proj to 8.0.0, first in F35 in a side tag and then F34.
>
> I'll rebuild the following dependent packages:
>
> gdal
> gdl
> grass
> libgeotiff
> librasterlite2
> libspatialite
> mapnik
> mapserver
> merkaartor
> ncl
> osm2
Sorry, I missed the mail. I have rebuild bout++ now
On 3/19/21 12:21 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> This update is still pending.
>
> On 24/02/21 20:07, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
>> Side-tag is ready for building the related dependencies:
>> f35-build-side-37890
>>
>> On 22/02/21
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Reduce_dependencies_on_python3-setuptools
== Summary ==
We'll do two things to reduce the number of Python packages
unnecessarily Requiring python3-setuptools:
# python3-devel will no longer Require python3-setuptools
# packages with console_scripts/gui_scri
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/187 (x86_64), 10/126 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210318.n.0):
ID: 821833 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/821833
ID: 821923 Test: aarch64 S
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 22/126 (aarch64), 12/187 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210318.n.0):
ID: 821532 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@
With F34 Beta declared GO, it's time to switch focus to Final. As a
reminder, the Final freeze begins on 6 April, with a preferred target
date of 20 April.
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. anaconda — kbd-legacy missing from installs which need keyboard
la
On Fri, 2021-03-19 at 16:35 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> With the current way of things (that could possibly change), when
> EPEL 10 is
> created, ELN is long gone in the RHEL 11 world.
>
> I could only imagine this scheme:
>
> ELN -> CentOS Stream N -> RHEL N
> ELN Extra -> EPEL N Next
I'd advocate strongly against a compat package.
The whole point of the change is to push the move to the new autoconf
upstream release. Not the availability of autoconf 2.71 to the end user.
For that, we would do much better with providing the end users with a
modular release, I think.
As for the
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210315.0):
ID: 822081 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/822081
ID: 822097 Test: aarch64 Io
Background
For the last 12 + months, the Community Platform Engineering team have
been developing a new service to replace the current FAS2 application
for the Fedora Account System.
The FAS2 application was written over 10 years ago with python2 and
TurboGears1 framework. Due to its dependencies
Eduard Lucena kirjoitti 19.3.2021 klo 16.57:
I'm not a proven packager, but I'm interested in clipit.
Is possible for me to take it?
You do not need to be a proven packager to adopt a package, being a
"normal" packager is enough. In that case you just click a button at
package's src.fp.o pag
OLD: Fedora-34-20210318.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210319.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 2
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:7.17 MiB
Size of
On 19. 03. 21 16:28, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:22 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:55 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 19. 03. 21 15:25, Troy Dawson wrote:
Problem: Users might want to test ELN for their own package/product
that either is only in Fedora, o
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:22 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:55 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 19. 03. 21 15:25, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > > Problem: Users might want to test ELN for their own package/product
> > > that either is only in Fedora, or that has dependencies that
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:55 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 19. 03. 21 15:25, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > Problem: Users might want to test ELN for their own package/product
> > that either is only in Fedora, or that has dependencies that are only
> > in Fedora and not ELN.
>
> I am not sure I underrate
I'm not a proven packager, but I'm interested in clipit.
Is possible for me to take it?
El vie, 19 mar 2021 a las 5:19, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski (<
domi...@greysector.net>) escribió:
> On Thursday, 18 March 2021 at 20:44, Michael Šimáček wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Due to lack of time and motiv
On 19. 03. 21 15:25, Troy Dawson wrote:
Problem: Users might want to test ELN for their own package/product
that either is only in Fedora, or that has dependencies that are only
in Fedora and not ELN.
I am not sure I underrated this problem entirely.
I thought ELN is used as an additional repo
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210318.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210319.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 8
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 76
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.43 MiB
Size of dropped packages:7.67
All,
Fedora infrastructure is getting a new accounts system! To put this in
place we will need an outage to our services.
There will be an outage starting at 2021-03-25 10:30UTC,
which will last approximately *TWO* days.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:25 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> I'm sending this out now so I don't have to say all this in this
> week's ELN meeting.
>
> Problem: Users might want to test ELN for their own package/product
> that either is only in Fedora, or that has dependencies that are only
> in Fedora
I'm sending this out now so I don't have to say all this in this
week's ELN meeting.
Problem: Users might want to test ELN for their own package/product
that either is only in Fedora, or that has dependencies that are only
in Fedora and not ELN.
Solution: Create ELN Extra for those extra packages
Hi all.
This update is still pending.
On 24/02/21 20:07, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
Side-tag is ready for building the related dependencies:
f35-build-side-37890
On 22/02/21 19:13, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
Hi all.
'sundials-5.7.0' is coming in Rawhide branch.
Is reasonable pushing it in f
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210318.0):
ID: 821230 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Thursday, 18 March 2021 at 20:44, Michael Šimáček wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Due to lack of time and motivation I've just orphaned the following
> packages which are now free to take:
> pasystray
I would've taken pasystray as I use it, but it seems Yaakov beat me
to it.
Yaakov, would you consider updat
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210318.0):
ID: 821216 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
25 matches
Mail list logo
