Since this package is basically a copy of some sources in LLVM, this
change is a reflection of the ongoing efforts to relicense LLVM to ASL
2.0, which are only partially complete.
--
Elliott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To uns
Hello,
I have just finished port of libravatar.org service to server provided
by Fedora. Big thanks to the Fedora project for sponsoring libravatar.
Avatars in pagure.io, src.fp.o, Bodhi should now load much faster.
Best regards!
clime
___
devel mailing
On Sun, 2021-03-14 at 13:47 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> The eln composes (at least as far as I know) are done via ODCS
> (on demand compose service) and are already available on the master
> mirrors:
>
> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/odcs/production/
> (Although not via rsync currently).
>
> Th
On 3/14/21 1:50 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 14.03.21 01:39, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 3/6/21 4:52 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I'll be updating proj to 8.0.0, first in F35 in a side tag and then F34.
I'll rebuild the following dependent packages:
gdl
vtk
I've added patches for proj 8 support t
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 05:07:06PM +, Davide Cavalca via devel wrote:
> I had filed https://github.com/fedora-eln/eln/issues/33 a while ago to
> track documentation improvements around how to consume ELN composes.
>
> I'd like to take a step back and propose adding them to the mirror
> networ
On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 05:09:44PM -0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> Sorry for coming late to the discussion. I took a week off and all
> sorts of things happened while I was gone.
That fast paced open source development. :)
> I believe Kevin and Smooge, and possibly even you Davide got this
> bac
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210313.0):
ID: 814567 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/814567
ID: 814576 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 5/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210313.0):
ID: 814480 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_rebase
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/814480
Ol
On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 19:10:03 +0100
Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> On 14.03.21 10:15, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 09:50:42 +0100
> > Sandro Mani wrote:
> >
> >> On 14.03.21 01:39, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> >>> On 3/6/21 4:52 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'll be updating pro
On 14.03.21 19:24, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 7:10 PM Sandro Mani wrote:
On 14.03.21 10:15, Dan Horák wrote:
On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 09:50:42 +0100
Sandro Mani wrote:
On 14.03.21 01:39, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 3/6/21 4:52 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I'll be updating pro
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 7:10 PM Sandro Mani wrote:
>
>
> On 14.03.21 10:15, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 09:50:42 +0100
> > Sandro Mani wrote:
> >
> >> On 14.03.21 01:39, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> >>> On 3/6/21 4:52 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'll be updating proj t
On 14.03.21 10:15, Dan Horák wrote:
On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 09:50:42 +0100
Sandro Mani wrote:
On 14.03.21 01:39, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 3/6/21 4:52 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I'll be updating proj to 8.0.0, first in F35 in a side tag and then F34.
I'll rebuild the following dependent packag
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 05:30:18PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > If we switch it's likely that we won't easily be able to go back.
>
> If you use properly versioned Obsoletes, then going back is as easy as
> unretiring the original package, increasing EVR ab
# F34 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2021-03-15
# Time: **16:00** UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We have 3 proposed Beta freeze exception issues, and 5 proposed
Final blockers to review (as of now), so we'll have a Fedora 34 blocker
review meeting tomorrow.
N
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting tomorrow. I don't have
anything urgent this week, and we'll be doing a blocker meeting for F34.
If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting.
Thanks!
--
Ad
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 7/187 (x86_64), 15/126 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210313.n.0):
ID: 814190 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/814190
ID: 814195 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso de
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 13/187 (x86_64), 26/126 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed i
I had filed https://github.com/fedora-eln/eln/issues/33 a while ago to
track documentation improvements around how to consume ELN composes.
I'd like to take a step back and propose adding them to the mirror
network, akin to what we already do for Rawhide. This would make it
trivial to consume or
On Sat, 2021-03-13 at 17:09 -0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
> Sorry for coming late to the discussion. I took a week off and all
> sorts of things happened while I was gone.
>
> I believe Kevin and Smooge, and possibly even you Davide got this
> backwards. And I think if we do this right, this can be
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> If we switch it's likely that we won't easily be able to go back.
If you use properly versioned Obsoletes, then going back is as easy as
unretiring the original package, increasing EVR above the version in the
Obsoletes, and adding a versioned Obsoletes the other way
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 11:04 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> I'm packaging American Fuzzy Loop (AFL) a fuzzing tool in Fedora.
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/american-fuzzy-lop
>
> This is the upstream we're using:
>
> https://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/afl/
> https://github.com/google/AF
I'm packaging American Fuzzy Loop (AFL) a fuzzing tool in Fedora.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/american-fuzzy-lop
This is the upstream we're using:
https://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/afl/
https://github.com/google/AFL
Upstream is dead. -ish. To be more precise there's some but not a
grea
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 09:49:13AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 10:21:45AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > AIUI end users are typing in these URLs and we download them on
> > demand.
> >
> > (I only wrote a very low-level component in this huge stack of cloud
> > stuff
OLD: Fedora-34-20210313.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210314.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 2
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210313.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210314.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 59
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 326.13 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210313.0):
ID: 813657 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 09:50:42 +0100
Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> On 14.03.21 01:39, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > On 3/6/21 4:52 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I'll be updating proj to 8.0.0, first in F35 in a side tag and then F34.
> >>
> >> I'll rebuild the following dependent packages:
> >>
>
On 14.03.21 01:39, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 3/6/21 4:52 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I'll be updating proj to 8.0.0, first in F35 in a side tag and then F34.
I'll rebuild the following dependent packages:
gdl
vtk
I've added patches for proj 8 support to these packages and submitted
builds i
On Sat, Mar 13, 2021, at 8:09 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 11:49 AM Davide Cavalca via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2021-03-01 at 09:26 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > I'd like to encourage anyone interested in this meeting to submit
> > > agenda topics by replying to
29 matches
Mail list logo
