Re: Work getting hwcaps microchiecture package geneataion into rpm

Reon Beon via devel writes: > https://hackweek.suse.com/all/projects/support-glibc-hwcaps-and-micro-architecture-package-generation > Comments > > dancermak > 5 days ago by dancermak | Reply > > This sounds very intriguing! I have a few notes about this: > you might be interes

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210309.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210308.0): ID: 804650 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

If any concerns about the autoconf2.69-2.69 compat package ? If needed it can be implemented as non-parallelly instalable, Thanks. Regards, Ondrej On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 8:08 AM Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > Thanks for your notes. If wanted, the first version of autoconf2.69-2.69 > compat package is a

Work getting hwcaps microchiecture package geneataion into rpm

https://hackweek.suse.com/all/projects/support-glibc-hwcaps-and-micro-architecture-package-generation Comments dancermak 5 days ago by dancermak | Reply This sounds very intriguing! I have a few notes about this: you might be interested in this (sadly stalled) upstream PR: ht

Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present

Do any of the bugs in this thread need to be proposed as blockers or freeze exceptions, for beta or final? This looks like it might have been lost in process because it got closed due to a fix for Fedora 33 instead of staying open until the F34 fix goes stable. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug

Re: python noarch packaging vs pip install

You could just run a script that runs dnf update --refresh, pip-review, php composer.phar update and drush update. Instead of trying to use system rpm packages for everything? For system, python, php and drupal module, etc updates? ___ devel mailing lis

Re: python noarch packaging vs pip install

Good point but most of those modules are updated to the latest by pypl on https://release-monitoring.org/ You do make a point that it is more convenient to just do one update via more than one. Good point. Thanks. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.

Re: python noarch packaging vs pip install

Same thing for all those drupal packages +modules drush and composer is all you need see: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/KW4DDCDSCYZL5CXN76TCMDUFZVIJ5N7S/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorapro

llvm version is incorrect, so is release

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936050 Name : llvm Version : 12.0.0 WRONG shoud be 10.00-rc1 Release : 0.1.rc1.fc35 WRONG should not have rc1 in it Architecture : x86_64 Size : 14 M Source : llvm-12.0.0-0.1.rc1.fc35.src.rpm Repository : rawhid

Re: Request to include package: coreboot

It supports lots of hardware, you don't have to do a build for each individual one. If people want different features/branches/usecases they will have to contact upstream. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an e

Re: Package update requires modification of config file in users' home directories

Hi Kevin, On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 1:26 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 01:03:05AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > I don't think that packagers should *ever* be in the business of > > modifying the content of users' $HOME directories. > > In fact this has happened before in

Re: Package update requires modification of config file in users' home directories

On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 01:03:05AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > I don't think that packagers should *ever* be in the business of > modifying the content of users' $HOME directories. In fact this has happened before in the past, leading to: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guid

Re: Package update requires modification of config file in users' home directories

On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 12:10 AM Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Upstream has just released a bugfix update for Molsketch and it's the > kind of update that can't wait for the next fedora release. Among the > other fixes, the new version has dropped support for

Re: Package update requires modification of config file in users' home directories

Hello Fabio, On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 1:03 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 12:10 AM Alexander Ploumistos > wrote: > > > > Upstream has just released a bugfix update for Molsketch and it's the > > kind of update that can't wait for the next fedora release. Among the > > other f

Re: Package update requires modification of config file in users' home directories

On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 12:10 AM Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > > Hello, > > Upstream has just released a bugfix update for Molsketch and it's the > kind of update that can't wait for the next fedora release. Among the > other fixes, the new version has dropped support for Qt4 and with it, > the -qt

Package update requires modification of config file in users' home directories

Hello, Upstream has just released a bugfix update for Molsketch and it's the kind of update that can't wait for the next fedora release. Among the other fixes, the new version has dropped support for Qt4 and with it, the -qt5 suffixes of several files. While testing it, I realized that after the u

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Hi all, Hau idatzi du Miro Hrončok (mhron...@redhat.com) erabiltzaileak (2021 mar. 8, al. (11:54)): > pg_activity orphan 2 weeks ago > pg_toporphan 2 weeks ago took these two. Kind regards, Mik

Re: Plymouth, themes and console clearing: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933378

On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 15:52 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 12:14:07PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > If you don't have plymouth installed, you get a very old-school "wall > > of text" boot process; > > I, for one, am for it. I _expect_ my servers to provide an old-schoo

Re: python noarch packaging vs pip install

Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > I'm just wondering: what's the benefit of packaging Python noarch > projects in Fedora? [...] > In what way is different from installing them by pip? · Users can install and use programs without caring about what programming language they are written in. · Programs

Re: python noarch packaging vs pip install

On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 at 12:34, Mattia Verga via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > I'm just wondering: what's the benefit of packaging Python noarch > projects in Fedora? > > I can see the reason about packaging architecture specific packages, > since they will benefit of optimizations

Re: python noarch packaging vs pip install

On 08.03.2021 18:33, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: I'm just wondering: what's the benefit of packaging Python noarch projects in Fedora? 1. Can be used in packaging of another packages. 2. Can be installed only once. Saves lots of disk space. 3. Can be easily updated to fix security vulnerabili

Re: python noarch packaging vs pip install

On 08. 03. 21 18:33, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: I'm just wondering: what's the benefit of packaging Python noarch projects in Fedora? You can use them as requirements for packaged applications. I can see the reason about packaging architecture specific packages, since they will benefit of

python noarch packaging vs pip install

I'm just wondering: what's the benefit of packaging Python noarch projects in Fedora? I can see the reason about packaging architecture specific packages, since they will benefit of optimizations and security flags that Fedora uses, but noarch packages are simply the source code that gets compiled

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 08. 03. 21 16:55, Miro Hrončok wrote: I happen to have a backup of the metadata from ~20 ages ago: Days, not ages :D -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 9:25 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 08. 03. 21 16:35, Parag Nemade wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 5:58 PM Richard W.M. Jones > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 11:52:10AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > The following pack

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 08. 03. 21 16:35, Parag Nemade wrote: On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 5:58 PM Richard W.M. Jones > wrote: On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 11:52:10AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 5:58 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 11:52:10AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for > sure > > that the package sh

Fedora-34-20210308.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 8/187 (x86_64), 18/126 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210307.n.0): ID: 803666 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/803666 ID: 803694 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz

annobin breaks reproducibility?

Hi, I'm currently working on reproducibility for Fedora packages and I'm hitting an issue with lto/annobin. Filenames generated with https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/lto-wrapper.c#L1769 makes annobin gcc plugin injecting in the default case random pattern into elf (https://so

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Hello, I'll take following: On 3/8/21 11:52 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > arp-scan  moceap, orphan, xmrbrz   2 > weeks ago Sincerely Peter ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

> avahi msekleta, orphan 0 weeks ago I'd like someone more familiar with this to take it, but if no one steps up, I will -G signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe s

Fedora-IoT-34-20210308.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 3/15 (aarch64), 1/16 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210307.0): ID: 804021 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_greenboot@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/804021 Old failures (same test failed i

Re: Fedora's GPG key in DNS(SEC)

Martin Sehnoutka wrote: > This system has other advantages as well: > * it can automatically install keys for 3rd party repos and verify > them using the DNSSEC trust anchor which is preinstalled on the system RPM Fusion is an example of such a third-party repo. To use packages from RPM Fusion

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 11:52:10 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > python-shapelyjcp, orphan 0 weeks ago I've added this to the set of neuro-sig packages. More co-maintainers are welcome: it seems to be used by quite a few packages. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinh

Fedora-Rawhide-20210308.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 7 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 19/187 (x86_64), 16/126 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20

Fedora 34 compose report: 20210308.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-34-20210307.n.0 NEW: Fedora-34-20210308.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:20.31 MiB Size of

Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present

Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 10:26:50AM +0100, Björn Persson wrote: > > > It can, but most people don't have a good setup for even local mail > > > delivery. Out of the box, we don't really do anything useful. > > It wouldn't take much. Install Postfix, and when Anaconda create

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 08. 03. 21 13:28, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 11:52:10AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please d

Fedora-IoT-35-20210308.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 4/15 (aarch64), 1/16 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210307.0): ID: 803570 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/803570

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 11:52:10AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > https://fed

Re: Heads Up: Update to proj-8.0.0 in F35 and F34

On 08.03.21 12:50, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: Sandro Mani wrote: merkaartor FYI, Merkaartor 0.18.4 (the latest release) does not build with proj 8 out of the box, I had to backport this not-yet-merged pull request: https://github.com/openstreetmap/merkaartor/pull/233 See: https://src.fedor

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210308.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210307.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210308.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:7 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 13 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 72 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 3.63 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Monday, 08 March 2021 at 11:52, Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > https://fedoraproj

Re: srpm rebuilding on RISC-V fedora image

Dear David, Thanks for your help.. I have successfully created RISC-V arch temporary config file for MOCK. Tried rebuilding SRPM using MOCK, its successfully rebuilt. Thanks BIlla ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe s

Re: Heads Up: Update to proj-8.0.0 in F35 and F34

Sandro Mani wrote: > merkaartor FYI, Merkaartor 0.18.4 (the latest release) does not build with proj 8 out of the box, I had to backport this not-yet-merged pull request: https://github.com/openstreetmap/merkaartor/pull/233 See: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/merkaartor/blob/f529682d49b0a843

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 08. 03. 21 11:52, Miro Hrončok wrote: python-pytest4churchyard, mrunge, orphan,  0 weeks ago   python-sig, radez, thm The report tooling is a bit stupid here, so it does not report the following packages as affected, but they are: p

Re: Request to include package: coreboot

On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 7:13 PM Reon Beon via devel wrote: > > People that want more security, uefi if they have only bios supported, or > boot speed. Also no other distros have it packaged yet so also people that > want to work on a upstream version. Firmware replacements tend not to be great u

Re: Request to include package: coreboot

On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 10:22 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > V Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 06:30:53PM -0500, Matthew Miller napsal(a): > > On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 07:13:07PM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote: > > > People that want more security, uefi if they have only bios supported, or > > > boot speed. Also n

Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present

On Sun, 2021-03-07 at 08:55 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 11:28 am, Björn Persson > wrote: > >  Do the ECC-less Intel processors also lack > > all other MCE support? > > No, ABRT used to regularly warn me about thermal events from MCE when > I > didn't have a good eno

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: Request to include package: coreboot

V Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 06:30:53PM -0500, Matthew Miller napsal(a): > On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 07:13:07PM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote: > > People that want more security, uefi if they have only bios supported, or > > boot speed. Also no other distros have it packaged yet so also people that > >

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210308.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210307.0): ID: 803226 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op