Re: How to build RISC-V Fedora disk image by muself

* Matthew Miller: > I really, really, really suggest focusing on either > anaconda/livemedia-creator or osbuild (aka composer, aka weldr). Isn't the original weldr gone (as in, last commit in mid-2018)? And it's lorax once more? Thanks, Florian ___ de

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210302.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210301.0): ID: 794899 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: Building custom kernels

Am 01.03.21 um 22:37 schrieb Justin Forbes: On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 12:00 PM Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 27.02.2021 o 20:59, Julian Sikorski pisze: Hi, I am trying to test some Renoir s2idle patches [1]. It appears that Fedora kernel source is now maintained on gitlab as kernel-ark [2]. Wh

Re: How to build RISC-V Fedora disk image by muself

On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 09:28:40PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > I am not sure how the image is actually built, but I have tried to > > > build an image with appliance-creator on a RISC-V VM, and the built > > > image is bootable. In my case: > > > > I'm curious to know if anaconda and li

Re: split-DNS, resolvconf on Fedora (OpenVPN related issues)

Petr Menšík wrote: > I don't think it is so easy. It can add facl on resolv.conf file before > it drops privileges. But Any other process might remove the file again > and write a new one, preventing openvpn to update it later. Because > openvpn is not supposed to be owner of /etc/resolv.conf, it s

Re: ELN SIG First Meeting

On Mon, 2021-03-01 at 15:49 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > That would require a lot of changes in both EPEL and in Fedora. In > Fedora there is a general expectation that if a 'branch' is active > then it is maintained by someone.. usually the primary maintainer.  > Many Fedora maintainers ar

Re: Policy proposal (draft): Don't push knowingly broken or work-in-progress work to dist git

On 01. 03. 21 21:29, Michael J Gruber wrote: But (if this hasn't changed lately) I cannot fork my own dist-git repo and file a PR, so I cannot use that to communicate my intentions to a provenpackager nor to my co-maintainers. You can. Not just lately, you always could, since Pull Requests we

Re: ELN SIG First Meeting

On Mon, 2021-03-01 at 12:47 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I'm not sure exactly what you mean here... > > I think (please correct me if I'm wrong) you are wanting "all EPEL > packages" to also be built as part of ELN and shipped as some sort of > 'EPEL-ELN' ? Yes, the idea I had in mind was that ea

Re: Orphaned Telegram packages

On Mon, 1 Mar 2021, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > I decided to retire and orphan all Telegram packages from Fedora and RPM > Fusion for the following reasons: [1]. > Sad to read this. Thanks for the work of these years, I have used the telegram-desktop package for years. -- Francisco J. Ts

Re: systemd-resolved fallback DNS servers: usability vs. GDPR

On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 11:03 pm, Lennart Poettering wrote: Hmm, cloud-init has no direct support for resolved.conf? But how is it then that that file is modified? I don't get it? I think they've deployed something entirely custom. ___ devel mailing

Re: systemd-resolved fallback DNS servers: usability vs. GDPR

On 02/03/2021 06:03, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Fr, 26.02.21 21:01, Alexander Bokovoy (aboko...@redhat.com) wrote: Digital Ocean updates pushed with cloud-init use. Cloud-init does not have any native support for systemd-resolved. It means it writes something that systemd-resolved imports int

Re: systemd-resolved fallback DNS servers: usability vs. GDPR

On Fr, 26.02.21 21:01, Alexander Bokovoy (aboko...@redhat.com) wrote: > > 1. Dots (".") for separating IPV4 address bytes > > 2. Colons (":") for separating IPv6 address parts, as well as separating > > port numbers from the IP addres > > 3. Brackets ("[]") for separating ipv6 addresses from the

Re: split-DNS, resolvconf on Fedora (OpenVPN related issues)

I don't think it is so easy. It can add facl on resolv.conf file before it drops privileges. But Any other process might remove the file again and write a new one, preventing openvpn to update it later. Because openvpn is not supposed to be owner of /etc/resolv.conf, it should not dictate what righ

Re: Building custom kernels

On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 12:00 PM Julian Sikorski wrote: > > W dniu 27.02.2021 o 20:59, Julian Sikorski pisze: > > Hi, > > > > I am trying to test some Renoir s2idle patches [1]. It appears that > > Fedora kernel source is now maintained on gitlab as kernel-ark [2]. What > > I tried is adding the p

Re: How to build RISC-V Fedora disk image by muself

On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 11:12:25AM -0800, Brian C. Lane wrote: > On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 07:28:49PM +0900, Takayuki Nagata wrote: > > I am not sure how the image is actually built, but I have tried to > > build an image with appliance-creator on a RISC-V VM, and the built > > image is bootable. In

Does Koji cancel builds when a new build is submitted?

And if so it this a new behaviour? I'm only wondering, not because I think this is bad, but because I've seen a bunch of builds today being cancelled and I wonder why it is happening. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and

Re: ELN SIG First Meeting

On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 14:46, Davide Cavalca via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2021-03-01 at 09:26 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > I'd like to encourage anyone interested in this meeting to submit > > agenda topics by replying to this email. Currently the agenda > > On

Re: ELN SIG First Meeting

On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 07:45:09PM +, Davide Cavalca via devel wrote: > On Mon, 2021-03-01 at 09:26 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > I'd like to encourage anyone interested in this meeting to submit > > agenda topics by replying to this email. Currently the agenda > > One thing I'd be inter

FedoraRespin-33-updates-20210301.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 5/37 (x86_64) ID: 794467 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/794467 ID: 794484 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/test

Re: Policy proposal (draft): Don't push knowingly broken or work-in-progress work to dist git

So, you list 3 typical reasons why packages in rawhide FTBFS and 2 existing policies which are meant to prevent 2 of these 3 reasons if packagers followed these policies. And you want these policies to be enforced technically What I am missing is: - A viable suggestion on how to prevent the thir

Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present

Hi, On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 9:46 AM Hans de Goede wrote: > > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1683 > > > > seems like this is already in updates. you definitely have the gnome-shell > > 40.beta in

Re: ELN SIG First Meeting

On Mon, 2021-03-01 at 09:26 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I'd like to encourage anyone interested in this meeting to submit > agenda topics by replying to this email. Currently the agenda One thing I'd be interested in exploring is the feasibility of extending ELN to cover EPEL as well. This w

Re: How to build RISC-V Fedora disk image by muself

On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 07:28:49PM +0900, Takayuki Nagata wrote: > I am not sure how the image is actually built, but I have tried to > build an image with appliance-creator on a RISC-V VM, and the built > image is bootable. In my case: I'm curious to know if anaconda and livemedia-creator will ru

Re: Self Introduction: Phil

On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 05:43:08PM -0800, Phil Dibowitz wrote: > Hi I'm Phil, a new Fedora packager! Some of you may know me from > devconf (both CZ and US) during my time at Facebook or as one of the > co-founders of the Southern California Linux Expo (SCALE) > conference. For the rest of you, hi,

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:47:25PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > == Contingency Plan == > * Contingency mechanism: moving this change to Fedora 36, if not > successfully finished until Fedora 35 branching from Rawhide > * Contingency deadline: Fedora 35 branching from Rawhide (2021-08-10) > * Blocks r

Re: OCaml 4.12

z3 build was cancelled, unclear why: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6206 Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-p2v converts physical machines

Re: Building custom kernels

On 2/28/21 12:00 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 27.02.2021 o 20:59, Julian Sikorski pisze: Hi, I am trying to test some Renoir s2idle patches [1]. It appears that Fedora kernel source is now maintained on gitlab as kernel-ark [2]. What I tried is adding the patches to the fedora-5.11 branc

Re: OCaml 4.12

On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 9:26 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > No worries! We really need a better way to visualise these > dependencies. At the moment I'm trying builds and breaking the deps > as I find them. I agree. The OCaml world is chock full of circular dependencies. I actually started wri

Re: OCaml 4.12

On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 09:18:31AM -0700, Jerry James wrote: > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 7:02 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Thinking about this more, rather than remove the subpackage(s) (there > > are several more), I've decided to make them conditional instead, so > > we have the choice to still

Fedora-IoT-35-20210301.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd x86_64 Iot dvd aarch64 Failed openQA tests: 7/15 (aarch64), 1/16 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210227.0): ID: 794426 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/794426

Re: OCaml 4.12

On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 7:02 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Thinking about this more, rather than remove the subpackage(s) (there > are several more), I've decided to make them conditional instead, so > we have the choice to still build them in future. Sorry about that. I thought I had broken the

Re: Dilemma: -source repository data randomized by koji builder arch

On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 6:58 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 8:38 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > > Neal is correct that you only need to **query** on different architecture. > > That is correct. > > However, querying all 25000+ .spec files from fedora every day is more > trou

Re: Dilemma: -source repository data randomized by koji builder arch

Dne 01. 03. 21 v 12:57 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): trouble than I asked for (and I don't even know how to "query on a different architecture" (do I need qemu-static for that?), and all mock -r fedora-33-ppc64le shell https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/wiki/Feature-forcearch -- Mir

Orphaning the cura-lulzbot package set

This fork of cura has basically been abandoned by upstream, and the new company that acquired Lulzbot has gone out of compliance with the source code for the firmware. They have made it very clear that they have no real interest in working with the community to improve this situation, and I no long

ELN SIG First Meeting

Thank you to everyone who responded to the WhenIsGood. While no time was available for all respondents, I selected the time with the greatest availability. We will hold the inaugural ELN SIG meeting on Friday, March 12th at noon EST (1700 UTC). We will hold this meeting on Freenode IRC in #fedora-m

Orphaned Telegram packages

Hello all. I decided to retire and orphan all Telegram packages from Fedora and RPM Fusion for the following reasons: [1]. Orphaned from Fedora: rpms/tdlib Orphaned from RPM Fusion: free/libtgvoip free/tg_owt free/telegram-desktop If someone interested, feel free to take them, but please rea

Logs from Open NeuroFedora Meeting: 1300 UTC on Monday, 1st March

Hi everyone, Please find the logs from today's meeting below. We will meet again in 2 weeks. Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-neuro/2021-03-01/neurofedora.2021-03-01-13.00.html Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-neuro/2021-03-01/neurofedora.2021-03-01-13.00.log.html

shigofumi-0.9 license change

shigofumi-0.9 changed license from "GPLv3+ and GPLv2+" to "GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+" because of a bundled gettext.h. -- Petr signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to dev

Re: OCaml 4.12

On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 11:59:22AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 11:47:41AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > We might need to remove a dependency somewhere to break the cycle, as > > we did with dune. > > I've removed the -doc subpackage from ocaml-integers. (Also

Re: split-DNS, resolvconf on Fedora (OpenVPN related issues)

Petr Menšík wrote: > It is about 2 years when we were removing CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE from our > services, because selinux-policy does not grant it anymore. I think it > is a good thing. Running as openvpn user, but requiring then > CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE is insecure! It gives it more rights than just root > u

Re: OCaml 4.12

On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 11:47:41AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > We might need to remove a dependency somewhere to break the cycle, as > we did with dune. I've removed the -doc subpackage from ocaml-integers. (Also possibly not related, but debuginfo generation was broken for this package so

Re: Dilemma: -source repository data randomized by koji builder arch

On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 8:38 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Neal is correct that you only need to **query** on different architecture. That is correct. However, querying all 25000+ .spec files from fedora every day is more trouble than I asked for (and I don't even know how to "query on a differen

Re: OCaml 4.12

Another problem is there is a circular dependency going through ocaml-odoc. I believe it's this (although there could be others): ocaml-odoc -> BR: ocaml-markup -> BR: ocaml-lwt -> BR: ocaml-luv -> BR: ocaml-ctypes -> BR: ocaml-integers -> BR: ocaml-odoc I broke it by excluding ocaml-odoc, but

Re: split-DNS, resolvconf on Fedora (OpenVPN related issues)

On 2/25/21 4:50 PM, David Sommerseth wrote: > Hi! > > On 25/02/2021 14:39, Petr Menšík wrote: > [..snip...] >> >> This case is exactly what I am trying to prevent. There is multiple >> implementations of dns cache, most of them can support split-DNS by some >> configuration. If openvpn supports sy

Re: How to build RISC-V Fedora disk image by muself

I am not sure how the image is actually built, but I have tried to build an image with appliance-creator on a RISC-V VM, and the built image is bootable. In my case: # dnf install appliance-tools # wget http://fedora.riscv.rocks:3000/davidlt/fedora-riscv-kickstarts/raw/branch/master/fedor

Re: Dilemma: -source repository data randomized by koji builder arch

Dne 25. 02. 21 v 16:34 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): Hello everybody, There's a problem that's been puzzling me for months, since I started writing the repochecker service (which provides the backend FTI/FTBFS data for the new packager-dashboard): There is no correct "source of truth" for BuildRe

Next Open NeuroFedora Meeting: 1300 UTC on Monday, 1st March (Today)

Hello everyone, Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 15 February at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Freenode). The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You can join us over: IRC: https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#fedora-neuro or Matri

Re: Self Introduction: Phil

Le 3/1/21 à 2:43 AM, Phil Dibowitz a écrit : Hey all, Hi I'm Phil, a new Fedora packager! Some of you may know me from devconf (both CZ and US) during my time at Facebook or as one of the co-founders of the Southern California Linux Expo (SCALE) conference. For the rest of you, hi, I'm Phil

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210301.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210228.0): ID: 793765 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Non-responsive maintainer: sabbaka

Good Morning Everyone, Since February 7th the packager sabbaka has been receiving a daily email asking them to either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS matches an existing bugzilla account. Having a bugzilla account is mandatory per: https://fedoraproject.org/