No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210227.0):
ID: 793314 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Sat, 2021-02-27 at 23:01 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't have
> anything urgent this week, and we'll be doing a blocker meeting for F34.
>
> If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week,
> please do reply
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't have
anything urgent this week, and we'll be doing a blocker meeting for F34.
If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting.
Thanks!
--
A
On Sat, 2021-02-27 at 09:37 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 04:11:22PM +0100, Łukasz Posadowski wrote:
> >
> > I just noticed, that:
> > /usr/bin/dnf -q updateinfo list
> > returns nothing on Rawhide. I have pending updates:
> >
> > dnf update
> > [...]
> > Transaction Summar
I'll add that I just hit this today on an old laptop running rawhide. I didn't
spend much time debugging the problem, but I did not see any obvious errors
being reported in the journal and simply disabling fprintd did not resolve the
issue with gdm. Masking fprintd, as Hans noted, is the big ham
The assimp license field for version 5.0.1 has changed from "BSD and
MIT" to "BSD and MIT and Boost and unlicense and zlib". This is due to
the addition of some more bundled dependencies since the 3.3.2 release.
Rich
___
devel mailing list -- devel@l
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 27, 2021, 2:56 PM Ray Strode wrote:
> ah i think we need to pull in
>
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1683
>
seems like this is already in updates. you definitely have the gnome-shell
40.beta installed? could be a pam_fprintd is returning a differe
Hi,
I am trying to test some Renoir s2idle patches [1]. It appears that
Fedora kernel source is now maintained on gitlab as kernel-ark [2]. What
I tried is adding the patches to the fedora-5.11 branch and running make
dist-srpm, but it failed due to config mismatch on CONFIG_INIT_STACK_NONE:
ah i think we need to pull in
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1683
Ray
On Sat, Feb 27, 2021, 2:31 PM Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi Benjamin, Ray,
>
> I noticed this problem while dogfooding F34, I'm fully up2date as of today.
>
> Today's gdm update did help in making th
Hi Benjamin, Ray,
I noticed this problem while dogfooding F34, I'm fully up2date as of today.
Today's gdm update did help in making the problem more clear.
What happens is that as soon as I press enter / click my main user in gdm,
the password entry box keeps getting updated (and clearing its co
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/15 (aarch64), 1/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210226.0):
ID: 793183 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/793183
ID: 793192 Test: aarch64
On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 04:11:22PM +0100, Łukasz Posadowski wrote:
>
> I just noticed, that:
> /usr/bin/dnf -q updateinfo list
> returns nothing on Rawhide. I have pending updates:
>
> dnf update
> [...]
> Transaction Summary
>
> Install 3 Packages
> Upgrade 8
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 14/187 (x86_64), 27/126 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 17/187 (x86_64), 21/126 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210226.n.0):
ID: 792788 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_updates
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/792788
ID: 792878 Test: aarch64 Se
I just noticed, that:
/usr/bin/dnf -q updateinfo list
returns nothing on Rawhide. I have pending updates:
dnf update
[...]
Transaction Summary
Install 3 Packages
Upgrade 84 Packages
Remove3 Packages
Total download size: 128 M
Is this ok [y/N]: N
Was some
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 5/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210226.0):
ID: 793076 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/793076
ID: 7930
OLD: Fedora-34-20210226.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210227.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210226.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210227.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 43
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210226.0):
ID: 792418 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
19 matches
Mail list logo
