+ music
Hi Marty,
Thank you for your gracious reply to my message re: pipx
I just wanted to declare that the new maintainer (Benjamin Beasley) need
not feel alone.
I'm a novice maintainer, but I respect the pipx project and want to see it
well represented in the fedora community.
Cheers,
Blaise
> Well, the idea would be for us to put it into Rawhide and do a series
> of test days/weeks to get feedback and close any remaining gaps. If it
> doesn't manage to pull through by beta freeze, then we would revert
> and push it back to Fedora 35.
Did these test days/weeks ever happen? I don't rec
On 19/02/2021 22:18, Łukasz Posadowski wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-02-19 at 20:19 +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Il giorno 19 feb 2021, alle ore 09:14, T.J. Yang <
>>> tjyang2...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>>>
>>> Hi Martin and Stephen
>>>
>>> Thank you for maintaining the pkgs for all these years.
On Fri, 2021-02-19 at 20:19 +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote:
>
>
> > Il giorno 19 feb 2021, alle ore 09:14, T.J. Yang <
> > tjyang2...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> >
> > Hi Martin and Stephen
> >
> > Thank you for maintaining the pkgs for all these years.
> > Since I am using the Nagios rpms at my day
> Il giorno 19 feb 2021, alle ore 09:14, T.J. Yang ha
> scritto:
>
> Hi Martin and Stephen
>
> Thank you for maintaining the pkgs for all these years.
> Since I am using the Nagios rpms at my dayjob , I for one will spend time on
> rpms producing matter.
> But I am fedora EPEL rpm workfl
This time with the correct version number.
Action summary
Proposed blockers
-
1. dogtag-pki — FreeIPA server deployment fails in current F34 and
Rawhide composes — NEW
ACTION: dogtag-pki maintainers to fix package to work with updated 389-ds-base.
2. pipewi
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 5:23 PM Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2/19/21 2:24 PM, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> > Hi Hans,
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 1:36 PM Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> While dogfooding F34 I noticed that out of tree kernel modules (1) are
> >> now being blocked,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 12:07:32PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> Richard, I see that the OCaml 4.12 release is not expected to happen
> until next week, after the beta freeze:
>
> https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/ocaml-4-12-0-first-release-candidate/7294
>
> Some of my OCaml packages are currently not i
Hi,
On 2/19/21 2:24 PM, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 1:36 PM Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> While dogfooding F34 I noticed that out of tree kernel modules (1) are
>> now being blocked, not by the kernel's lockdown mechanism (which only
>> does this when se
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 16/183 (x86_64), 18/124 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210218.n.0):
ID: 783108 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_updates
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/783108
ID: 783133
Hi Hans,
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 1:36 PM Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> While dogfooding F34 I noticed that out of tree kernel modules (1) are
> now being blocked, not by the kernel's lockdown mechanism (which only
> does this when secureboot is enabled) but by selinux:
>
> audit: type=1400 a
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210218.0):
ID: 783398 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/783398
ID: 783403 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd
OLD: Fedora-34-20210218.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210219.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 120
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 254.01 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
Hi All,
While dogfooding F34 I noticed that out of tree kernel modules (1) are
now being blocked, not by the kernel's lockdown mechanism (which only
does this when secureboot is enabled) but by selinux:
audit: type=1400 audit(1613736626.937:95): avc: denied { integrity } for
pid=401 comm="sys
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
4 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 19/183 (x86_64), 18/124 (aarch64
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 34 Branched 20210219.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210218.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210219.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 136
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.22 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hi,
I am packaging a container image and I would love to get a review on it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930236
I can review either a container image or an RPM package back for you :)
regards,
Athos
___
devel mailing list -- devel@l
On 19. 02. 21 9:52, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:29 PM Pierre - Yves Chibon
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 03:35:11PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 09. 02. 21 15:27, Tom Stellard wrote:
Has there been any more discussion about disabling simple-koji-ci on
packages with Zuul
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 8:56 AM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:29 PM Pierre - Yves Chibon
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 03:35:11PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > On 09. 02. 21 15:27, Tom Stellard wrote:
> > > > Has there been any more discussion about disabling simple
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:29 PM Pierre - Yves Chibon
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 03:35:11PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 09. 02. 21 15:27, Tom Stellard wrote:
> > > Has there been any more discussion about disabling simple-koji-ci on
> > > packages with Zuul enabled?
> >
> > It's generall
Hi Martin and Stephen
Thank you for maintaining the pkgs for all these years.
Since I am using the Nagios rpms at my dayjob , I for one will spend time
on rpms producing matter.
But I am fedora EPEL rpm workflow newbie and I don't maintain any existing
rpm.
Are there experienced ones out there
22 matches
Mail list logo
