On 1/22/21 8:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2021-01-22 at 09:57 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 1/21/21 8:37 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 10:53 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Florian Weimer wrote:
With rpm-4.15.1-3.fc32.1.x86_64, I get this error:
$ rpm -qip
Dear all,
I am trying to install RPM on riscv target (QEMU), but its throwing error.
Even Though gzip/bzip2/xz are installed in target.
Error:
*/home # uname -aLinux C-DAC 5.4.1 #1 SMP Wed Dec 30 17:01:02 IST 2020
riscv64 GNU/Linux/home # rpm -i
calendar-1.28-4.20140613cvs.fc33.riscv64
On 1/24/21 5:40 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sun, 2021-01-24 at 16:42 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 1/23/21 1:09 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Have we a FedoraRespin-32 ? we might want install a Fedora 32 .
Live respins are unofficial and only for the latest release:
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/a
On Sun, 2021-01-24 at 16:42 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 1/23/21 1:09 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Have we a FedoraRespin-32 ? we might want install a Fedora 32 .
>
> Live respins are unofficial and only for the latest release:
> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/live-respins/
Sorry, about a
Hi folks! Sorry for the late notice - I'm proposing we cancel the QA
meeting tomorrow. I don't have anything urgent this week.
If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting.
Thanks!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedo
On 1/23/21 1:09 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Have we a FedoraRespin-32 ? we might want install a Fedora 32 .
Live respins are unofficial and only for the latest release:
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/live-respins/
And about archive , shouldn't we archive 3 or 4 versions ? if last one
have a
- Original Message -
> From: "Ankur Sinha"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, "For participants of the Documentation
> Project"
> Sent: Monday, January 18, 2021 12:31:10 PM
> Subject: Re: Migrating the Fedora Developer Portal to Fedora Docs
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 10:34:32 -0500, Pav
On 24. 01. 21 19:43, Ville-Pekka Vainio wrote:
Hi,
This is a re-review for a rename and going from arch-specific to
noarch: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919688
The arch-noarch stuff was discussed here:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/t
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 08:21:48PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 7:54 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 08:38:44PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 03:21:14PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > > > I've been poking at it more today
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 7:54 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 08:38:44PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 03:21:14PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > > I've been poking at it more today...
> > > >
> > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 08:38:44PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 03:21:14PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > I've been poking at it more today...
> > >
> > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=60286478
> > > > Total time 13:19:20
> > > > Task time
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 4:42 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 23. 01. 21 2:18, Tom Stellard wrote:
> > On 1/21/21 7:28 AM, Tom Stellard wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> We are going to be building clang-11.1.0 for rawhide, which changes the
> >> soname
> >> of libclang.so and libclang-cpp.so. This is unusu
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 03:21:14PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I've been poking at it more today...
> >
> > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=60286478
> > > Total time13:19:20
> > > Task time 1:11:53
> >
> > Yeah, basically kojid get OOM killed, which causes
Hi,
This is a re-review for a rename and going from arch-specific to
noarch: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919688
The arch-noarch stuff was discussed here:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/JSEYB5XU24HEX7BR2QVJ732MR5P52YJ6/
Voikko 4
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 at 00:12, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> If the files are not arch-specific, just override the location to be
> always /usr/lib/voikko. Pedantically speaking, this is not exactly following
> the FHS, but it's easiest to follow upstream here. The difference between
> /usr/
On 23. 01. 21 2:18, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 1/21/21 7:28 AM, Tom Stellard wrote:
Hi,
We are going to be building clang-11.1.0 for rawhide, which changes the soname
of libclang.so and libclang-cpp.so. This is unusual for clang, since the
soname will change without bumping the major version numb
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> But the thing is, fstatat is not really a newer version of fstat, it
> unfortunately has very different security properties. fstat allows
> retrieving the stat metadata only of already open files (if you know or
> guess the fd). On the other hand, fstatat allows retr
Florian Weimer wrote:
> The fstat/fstat64 system call does not exist on arc and riscv/rv32.
> glibc tries to consolidate the implementations as far as possible, so if
> the kernel deprecates a system call and the replacement is already
> supported by all architectures, glibc uses that, rather than
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 4/15 (aarch64), 2/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210123.0):
ID: 761432 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/76
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
5 of 43 required tests failed, 13 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 21/181 (x86_64), 12/123 (aarch6
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210123.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210124.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 87
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 348.88 KiB
Size of dropped packages
* Kevin Kofler via devel:
> Unfortunately, the fix is more complicated than that. It is really not
> helpful behavior from glibc to use the fstatat syscall to implement fstat.
> (What is the benefit of doing that?)
The fstat/fstat64 system call does not exist on arc and riscv/rv32.
glibc tries to
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 34 Rawhide 20210124.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
23 matches
Mail list logo
