No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 747200 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/747200
ID: 747207 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Ba
Hello fellow developers.
I've joined this list quite a while ago, mostly to keep a pulse on the Fedora
development community, but also to look to become a package contributor. But
before getting to that, a few words about myself.
I've been "into computers" since mid-80's, started off with a 4.7
Hi,
I was taking a look at /etc/appstream.conf and I see there is a screenshot
website for Debian and Ubuntu:
```
[debian]
ScreenshotUrl=http://screenshots.debian.net
[opensuse]
ScreenshotUrl=http://software.opensuse.org/package
```
(There is one of Ubuntu but really does not exist)
Is there some
Hey all,
While installing Debian for setting up an appliance, I discovered they
have something called a “popularity contest” that, according to my
understanding, allows for package statistics to be gathered and used by
the developers/packagers.
Has anything like this been considered for Fedo
Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> Arguably those with elevated access (provenpackagers(*))
> should be required to use a hardware token such
> as a FIDO2 authenticators with biometrics and/or
> PIN required
I'm in favor of complementing the FAS passphrase with a second factor.
I'm against any attempt to r
Hello team,
openvdb-8.0.0 is released upstream meaning the soversion is now 8.0
resulting a break on dependent packages like OpenImageIO and Blender as
tested on COPR blender[1]. The commit is already complete
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openvdb
and it is a matter of building for pro
Am Samstag, dem 26.12.2020 um 22:10 +0100 schrieb Dominik 'Rathann'
Mierzejewski:
> On Wednesday, 23 December 2020 at 02:13, Mark E. Fuller wrote:
> > I'm not quite sure where else to direct this - I intermittently do
> > some
> > Fortran work and the Eclipse plugin (eclipse-photran) appears to
> >
On Wednesday, 23 December 2020 at 02:13, Mark E. Fuller wrote:
> I'm not quite sure where else to direct this - I intermittently do some
> Fortran work and the Eclipse plugin (eclipse-photran) appears to have
> disappeared from the repos since F32. Looking at Koji, releng was
> previously doing the
On Friday, 25 December 2020 at 22:26, Vascom wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I want to update cryptopp package to 8.3.0.
> It has the same soname version but changes in ABI.
If there are ABI changes without SONAME bump, then it's at least worth
opening a ticket with upstream. It might be unintentional and t
Hi,
For me the most time consuming is monkey updates packages like kde apps
, which every month or two we have a new release ( kde app 20.04.1
20.04.2 20.08.0 , 20.12.00 etc )
I did some scripts to automate my builds , we got some software like
https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/
b
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64)
ID: 747174 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/747174
ID: 747178 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_ignition
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 07:32:04AM +, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> > The weakest point in the current system is really the FAS password. If
> > you have a packager's FAS password you can change the ssh key
> > associated with the account to another that you control, and the FAS
> > password is al
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 12:49:10AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> Just to expand on this a little. Removing access from people that have
> left the project either because they've decided they're able to
> continue to contribute (option 1) or because something has triggered
> an admin process (op
On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 01:04:50AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 23. 12. 20 0:11, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Cool. The help didn't get me this at all.;)
> >
> >--from-git FROM_GIT regexes for packages to build from git
> >
> > Perhaps that should be "copr-name packager-name:packagename:branch
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 9/180 (x86_64), 12/122 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in F
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 7/15 (aarch64)
ID: 747139 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/747139
ID: 747148 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL:
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201225.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201226.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 15
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 36
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 14.40 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
On 22. 12. 20 21:39, Adam Williamson wrote:
Perhaps we need a process for cleaning up membership of this extremely
powerful group? If the FAS password of*any one* of those user accounts
were somehow compromised (or if just one of them decided they had a
grudge against Fedora now and were going t
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 746771 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/746771
ID: 746778 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Ba
19 matches
Mail list logo
