Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> While trying to build a new kde-partitionmanager release, I get a strange
> build failure which seems related to character encoding:
>
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8985/57428985/build.log
>
> /builddir/build/BUILD/partitionmanager-20.12.0/i686-
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> Unable to build anything with qt5-qtbase-devel dependency in Koji on
> s390x for Fedora 33 due to the following:
>
> Error:
> Problem 1: package qt5-qtbase-devel-5.15.2-2.fc33.s390x requires
> pkgconfig(vulkan), but none of the providers can be
On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 at 00:23, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>
> On Thursday, December 17, 2020 8:05:40 PM CET Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Enable_Spec_File_Preprocessing
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > This change should enable an opt-in spec file preprocessor in Fedora
> > infras
On Thursday, December 17, 2020 8:05:40 PM CET Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Enable_Spec_File_Preprocessing
>
> == Summary ==
> This change should enable an opt-in spec file preprocessor in Fedora
> infrastructure for the benefit of packagers. The preprocessor allows
>
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 02:01:22PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Just another heads up for folks.
>
> The glib2-2.67.1 update (in the rawhide thats composing right now) seems
> to cause gdm to crash here. Downgrading to 2.67.0 everything is working
> again.
>
> I've filed:
> https://gitlab.gnome.o
Following from the Btrfs as rootfs idea in the "Proposal: drop 'Test
installation media' from live media" thread, I went down the separate
rabbit hole of how to do persistence by default. The following is not
Btrfs specific.
The xorriso options (isohybrid-mbr, et al) we're using creates a
deeply c
Just another heads up for folks.
The glib2-2.67.1 update (in the rawhide thats composing right now) seems
to cause gdm to crash here. Downgrading to 2.67.0 everything is working
again.
I've filed:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/2273
on it.
Rawhide users may want to exclude it or
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 2:28 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:14 PM Brian C. Lane wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 11:03:03PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > Right. The two I've previously suggested: btrfs seed and dm-verity.
> > > Every read is verified, the user can'
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 08:20:56PM +, FreedomBen via devel wrote:
> Hi all,
Welcome!
> My name is Ben Porter. I've been a Fedora user since the Gnome 2 days (Fedora
> 13). I used to distro hop a lot but always ended up back on Fedora due to a
> high level of alignment on philosophy between
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 05:33:57PM +0100, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> Am 18.12.20 um 15:33 schrieb James Szinger:
> > I see nss.x86_64 3.59.0-3.fc33 in today’s updates. Is this fixed or
> > are there going to be a lot of unhappy Firefox users? The bug is
> > still open.
> >
>
> Can someone pls lush
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:20:38PM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Thursday, December 17, 2020 8:55:48 PM CET Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:40:24AM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > On Sunday, December 13, 2020 11:02:53 PM CET Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > > * Finally releng is look
On 2020-12-17 3:27 a.m., Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 17. 12. 20 v 8:02 Luya Tshimbalanga napsal(a):
Frontend for spec file
??? Can you elaborate it?
Just an idea of a form application that generates the spec file for
newcomers as an example.
--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Fedora Design Team
Fedora Des
Hi all,
My name is Ben Porter. I've been a Fedora user since the Gnome 2 days (Fedora
13). I used to distro hop a lot but always ended up back on Fedora due to a
high level of alignment on philosophy between myself and the Fedora Project. I
did have a sordid love affair with Arch for a few year
On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 at 20:57, clime wrote:
>
> On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 at 20:07, Dan Čermák
> wrote:
> >
> > clime writes:
> >
> > > On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 22:04, James Szinger wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 14:05:40 -0500
> > >> Ben Cotton wrote:
> > >>
> > >> 1. How does this affect u
On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 at 20:07, Dan Čermák wrote:
>
> clime writes:
>
> > On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 22:04, James Szinger wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 14:05:40 -0500
> >> Ben Cotton wrote:
> >>
> >> 1. How does this affect users who download, maybe modify, and rebuild
> >> the SRPM? Can they
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 2:21 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2020-12-19 at 20:07 +0100, Dan Čermák wrote:
> > clime writes:
> >
> > > On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 22:04, James Szinger wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 14:05:40 -0500
> > > > Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 1. How does
On Sat, 2020-12-19 at 20:07 +0100, Dan Čermák wrote:
> clime writes:
>
> > On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 22:04, James Szinger wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 14:05:40 -0500
> > > Ben Cotton wrote:
> > >
> > > 1. How does this affect users who download, maybe modify, and rebuild
> > > the SRPM
Jonathan Wakely writes:
> On 15/12/20 23:46 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>On 12/15/20 11:29 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>>>I am looking for challenges for upcoming year - what I and my team should
>>>enhance. I have some ideas, but I want to hear
>>>yours.
>>
>>Thanks for doing this!
>>
>>>What you
clime writes:
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 22:04, James Szinger wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 14:05:40 -0500
>> Ben Cotton wrote:
>>
>> 1. How does this affect users who download, maybe modify, and rebuild
>> the SRPM? Can they continue to use rpmbuid and mock as they have
>> been? Does the SR
On Sat, 2020-12-19 at 18:23 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> I suspect a compose might fail because of this as well. Shall we untag the
> build?
I rebuilt libreswan (which did fail the compose) already. I'll try the
others shortly. Note libreswan had similarly been bumped to a newer
version in git
On 12/19/20 6:23 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello.
Two months ago, ldns was updated with a soname bump:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ldns/c/e785c9bef81c0bb4e53f6f51ace63e6c0e12a615?branch=master
Today, it was built for the first time. As a result, many packages don't
install:
dnsperf: h
Hello.
Two months ago, ldns was updated with a soname bump:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ldns/c/e785c9bef81c0bb4e53f6f51ace63e6c0e12a615?branch=master
Today, it was built for the first time. As a result, many packages don't
install:
dnsperf: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=19
A new build of ldns was done for Rawhide yesterday by law/pemensik:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1660180
This build changes the soname of libreport from libldns.so.2 to
libldns.so.3.
This bump was not announced AFAICS, and none of its several
dependencies appear to hav
After I recently took over maintainership of the orphaned mpir package, I found
that the License field was based on the overall license rather than on a
complete audit of source file license headers. Accordingly, I updated the
License field from:
LGPLv3+
to:
LGPLv3+ and LGPLv2+ and (LGPLv3+ o
Am 18.12.20 um 15:33 schrieb James Szinger:
I see nss.x86_64 3.59.0-3.fc33 in today’s updates. Is this fixed or
are there going to be a lot of unhappy Firefox users? The bug is
still open.
Can someone pls lush this into rawhide? There is only -2 WITH the SHA-1
blockade.
Best regards,
Mari
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 5/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20201218.0):
ID: 744525 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744525
ID: 7445
Great, many thanks for your help, it works !
Regards
Martin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/
Martin Gansser wrote on 2020/12/19 21:03:
Hi,
marsshooter-0.7.6 fails on rawhide with this error message [1]:
/builddir/build/BUILD/M.A.R.S.-marsshooter-0.7.6/src/Hud/TabStats.cpp:68:140:
required from here
/usr/include/c++/11/bits/stl_tree.h:785:15: error: static assertion failed:
comparis
Hello,
I'm looking for a new maintainer of the hwloc package:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hwloc
If anyone is interested, please feel free to take ownership.
Thanks a lot!
Jirka
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscr
Hi,
marsshooter-0.7.6 fails on rawhide with this error message [1]:
/builddir/build/BUILD/M.A.R.S.-marsshooter-0.7.6/src/Hud/TabStats.cpp:68:140:
required from here
/usr/include/c++/11/bits/stl_tree.h:785:15: error: static assertion failed:
comparison object must be invocable as const
785 |
On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 at 03:02, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>
>
> On 2020-12-18 11:13 a.m., Robbie Harwood wrote:
> > clime writes:
> >
> >> On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 18:20, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> >>> Robert-André Mauchin writes:
> >>>
> On 12/18/20 3:52 PM, James Szinger wrote:
> > No. One
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201218.0):
ID: 744303 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
32 matches
Mail list logo
