No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20201112.0):
ID: 722312 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On 11/14/20 7:44 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
Isn't there anyone that tried to do that? :-)
Taking into account that Fedora is a distro that is always searching to
be on the cutting edge: Don't you think that is somewhat annoying and a
thing of the past to install from a usb stick (and not to ment
Isn't there anyone that tried to do that? :-)
Taking into account that Fedora is a distro that is always searching to be
on the cutting edge: Don't you think that is somewhat annoying and a thing
of the past to install from a usb stick (and not to mention from CD)?
It could be nice to download the
Ken Dreyer wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 3:23 PM Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>> That reason was _mainly_ to erase the inside Red Hat,
>> community-around-the-edges distinction. That was a huge success and
>> Fedora wouldn't be interesting without that. But I think the _technical_
>> choice was in
Matthew Miller wrote:
> But that's policy as well. It would be reasonable to have a different
> policy, like "build and soft dependencies are okay from base -> secondary,
> but not hard runtime requirements".
But a build-time dependency often automatically results in a hard runtime
dependency, e.
On Sat, 2020-11-14 at 19:11 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 6:02 PM Markus Larsson
> wrote:
>
> > Sounds like a horrible experience. It seems circumventable by not
> > caching entire OUs though. They way sssd has been used where I have
> > been it has only cached users a
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 6:02 PM Markus Larsson wrote:
> Sounds like a horrible experience. It seems circumventable by not caching
> entire OUs though. They way sssd has been used where I have been it has only
> cached users actually logging in. That's a single setting in sssd.conf that
> makes
On 14 November 2020 23:35:09 CET, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 5:11 PM Markus Larsson wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5 November 2020 13:58:54 CET, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> >
>> >sssd also breaks other LDAP setups, It's extremely broken with larger
>> >LDAP setups because it insi
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 5:11 PM Markus Larsson wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5 November 2020 13:58:54 CET, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> >sssd also breaks other LDAP setups, It's extremely broken with larger
> >LDAP setups because it insists on caching *ALL* of the LDAP, barring
> >being able to filter to o
On 5 November 2020 13:58:54 CET, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>sssd also breaks other LDAP setups, It's extremely broken with larger
>LDAP setups because it insists on caching *ALL* of the LDAP, barring
>being able to filter to only a smaller set of the LDAP. But because so
>many LDAP setups scatt
Hello!
I submitted a new package for the unit-testing library, which is approved
already, but I have no sponsor yet.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843300
I remember, when the package was approved, some sponsor has sent me an
email with a task for checking my skills, but I lost th
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 06:45:55PM +0100, Christopher Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
> something weird is going on with the rawhide compose (thanks Vit for
> alerting me)
>
> On 13.11.20 00:44, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> > Package: nextcloud-20.0.1-3.fc34
> > Old package: nextcloud-20.0.1-2.fc34
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 02:12:44PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> ... and third version:
>
> https://mattia.fedorapeople.org/updates_policy_v3.svg
> https://mattia.fedorapeople.org/updates_policy_v3.png
Thanks for working on this. ;)
I still don't like 'bodhi activation point'. Can you
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 01:05:49AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > We have been over this. If anyone could untag anything they felt like it
> > would make it much more difficult for everyone to integrate their
> > changes with the rest of the collection.
>
> That issu
Thanks for fixing it!
I tried on irc, but I'm not an irc guy and couldn't make it past "cannot send
to nick/channel" ...
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora C
On Saturday, November 14, 2020 2:36:43 PM CET Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Same today:
>
> ssh: connect to host 3.237.199.13 port 22: Connection timed out
>
> https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mjg/scribus/fedora-32-x86_64/01768969-scribus156/builder-live.log.gz
>
> Copr infra netwo
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 5/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20201014.0):
ID: 722287 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/722287
ID: 722291 Test: aarch64 IoT
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora-IoT 34 RC 20201114.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_pl
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 16/177 (x86_64), 16/115 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20201112.n.0):
ID: 721982 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso deskt
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/15 (aarch64), 1/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20201109.0):
ID: 722270 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/722270
ID: 722274 Test: aarch64
Same today:
ssh: connect to host 3.237.199.13 port 22: Connection timed out
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mjg/scribus/fedora-32-x86_64/01768969-scribus156/builder-live.log.gz
Copr infra networked borked?
___
devel mailing list -- d
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201112.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201114.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 10
Added packages: 20
Dropped packages:9
Upgraded packages: 233
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 13.50 MiB
Size of dropped packages
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64), 7/7 (aarch64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le..
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201112.0):
ID: 721912 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
24 matches
Mail list logo
