On 2020-10-30 1:04 a.m., Peter Robinson wrote:
AMD Sensor Fusion HUB codes finally recently landed on Linux kernel for
5.11 [1]. It will be nice one of developers build only an installable
rpm mobule for testing purpose (screen autoration depending of the
position) on AMD mobile Ryzen powered co
They are generated by the rpm requires/dependency generators in
rpm-mpi-hooks, so that needs to be in the buildroot when the package is
built.
The libraries/binaries also need to be installed into the
%{_libdir}/openmpi/{bin,share,lib} hierarchy.
HTH,
Orion
On 10/30/20 2:30 PM, Mark Olese
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't
have anything urgent this week.
If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting.
Thanks!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC:
On Friday, 30 October 2020 at 23:57, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hi!
> I'm updating pyelftools to 0.27 in rawhide. Here's the changelog:
> https://github.com/eliben/pyelftools/commit/ba73057e2503fe4b6f44eb0e9c1d5a747a235628
COPR with rebuilds:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ra
Hi!
I'm updating pyelftools to 0.27 in rawhide. Here's the changelog:
https://github.com/eliben/pyelftools/commit/ba73057e2503fe4b6f44eb0e9c1d5a747a235628
The package is not required at runtime by anything, as far as I can
tell, and is only BuildRequired by four packages:
dpdk
erlang-rpm-macros
p
On 10/30/20 9:30 PM, Mark Olesen wrote:
> I need to follow up on my own post - still haven't figured out how the
> RPM requires are done.
>
> In the first step, I've completely stripped out my package so that it
> only builds a simple library (pretty much an mpi "hello world"), and
> an executable
Am 25.10.20 um 22:47 schrieb Leigh Scott:
See
https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2020/10/2020-10-23-RIAA.md
Githubs CEO has contacted the youtube-dl devs to help them getting
theire repo back online:
http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/4zuP1Ce7AJU/riaas-youtube-dl-takedow
I need to follow up on my own post - still haven't figured out how the
RPM requires are done.
In the first step, I've completely stripped out my package so that it
only builds a simple library (pretty much an mpi "hello world"), and an
executable to call it. Wrapped them in a spec file, and th
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 19/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-202
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201029.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201030.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 9
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 102
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 11.05 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Dne 29. 10. 20 v 19:57 Brandon Nielsen napsal(a):
I have been using it pretty much daily and haven't had any issues. Is
this only with F33?
I am Rawhide user, so yes, it might be F33+ issue, because I observe
this behavior already for a few months.
I have only just updated my "work" mach
On Wed, 2020-10-28 at 17:07 -0700, Davide Cavalca via devel wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've been involved in the Fedora and CentOS communities for a few
> years
> now as part of the Operating Systems team at Facebook, and most
> recently helped drive the btrfs by default change proposal for Fedora
> 33.
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 1:35 AM Micah Shennum wrote:
>
> Thank you, I will be sure to compare specs. On a related note, I am of
> course also open to co-maintainership.
I wish I could say the same, but the reason why I'm currently using
tmuxinator via my copr repository is precisely that I don't
On Thursday, October 29, 2020 10:49:27 PM WET Barry wrote:
> After the trauma of the 3.0 release it would be mad to do a python 4.0 for
> such a trivial reason as packagers that assumed, wrongly, that version can
> only have single digits.
>
> Barry
This now is an epistemological discussion. :-)
> AMD Sensor Fusion HUB codes finally recently landed on Linux kernel for
> 5.11 [1]. It will be nice one of developers build only an installable
> rpm mobule for testing purpose (screen autoration depending of the
> position) on AMD mobile Ryzen powered convertible laptops (in my case,
> Ryzen 250
Hello team,
AMD Sensor Fusion HUB codes finally recently landed on Linux kernel for
5.11 [1]. It will be nice one of developers build only an installable
rpm mobule for testing purpose (screen autoration depending of the
position) on AMD mobile Ryzen powered convertible laptops (in my case,
R
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20201028.0):
ID: 710334 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj
18 matches
Mail list logo
