Re: 389ds making a local dns server for local web app.

2020-10-14 Thread rodentskie
Hi sir, I installed and configured successfully freeipa. The problem now is I can't login my admin account. No error when running "kinit admin", but when logging in through the web UI, it will return an error message saying "Login failed due to an unknown reason. ".

Aiming to orphan java-comment-preprocessor package

2020-10-14 Thread Ondrej Dubaj
Hi guys, I am aiming to orphan java-comment-precprocessor package, as it seems, there are no other packages (AFAIK) depending on it. If there is someone, who is actively using this package, or maintains a package, which depends on it, please let us know to this thread, so we can discuss next steps

[Test-Announce] Re: Fedora 33 Candidate RC-1.1 Available Now!

2020-10-14 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2020-10-14 at 10:43 +, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > According to the schedule [1], Fedora 33 Candidate RC-1.1 is now > available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation > testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: > https://fedoraproject.org/

[Test-Announce] Fedora 33 Final is NO-GO, Release Readiness meeting still on

2020-10-14 Thread Ben Cotton
Due to outstanding unresolved blockers, there is no release candidate for Fedora 33 Final yet. I am cancelling tomorrow's Go/No-Go meeting. The Release Readiness meeting *will be held* as scheduled[1]. Please update the Release Readiness wiki page[2] with your team's readiness if appropriate. We wi

Re: new packager asks for help - packaging my first Python package

2020-10-14 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 14. 10. 20 20:29, Vojtěch Polášek wrote: Hello, I have some basics of RPM packaging, but I have not created a package from scratch yet. I would like to package one Python package called Tesserwrap. I used the pyp2rpm program to create a spec file. The file is here: https://fedorapeople.or

new packager asks for help - packaging my first Python package

2020-10-14 Thread Vojtěch Polášek
Hello, I have some basics of RPM packaging, but I have not created a package from scratch yet. I would like to package one Python package called Tesserwrap. I used the pyp2rpm program to create a spec file. The file is here: https://fedorapeople.org/~vpolasek/tesserwrap.spec Unfortunately t

Re: intending to retire thunderbird-enigmail in F34+

2020-10-14 Thread Vít Ondruch
As a Rawhide use, who is effectively F34 user already, I'd appreciate if you retired the thunderbird-enigmail in F35+ or mabybe just wait a bit longer. This is good candidate for inclusion in fedora-obsolete-packages BTW. OTOH I'll soon update also my other computer and won't care anymore ;) Vít

Fedora-IoT-33-20201014.0 compose check report

2020-10-14 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20201013.0): ID: 695479 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/te

Fedora-IoT-34-20201014.0 compose check report

2020-10-14 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20201013.0): ID: 695446 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/695446 ID: 695464 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_defaul

Fedora-33-20201014.n.0 compose check report

2020-10-14 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20201013.n.0): ID: 695111 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/695111 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-33-2020101

Re: fedora net install iso the possibilitie to add espeakup for people like me whome are blind?

2020-10-14 Thread Martin Kolman
On Thu, 2020-10-08 at 12:05 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 12:43 pm, Robbie Harwood > wrote: > > That's unfortunate, and will hurt adoption with users who need it. > > Are > > there things that could be done to make it easier to add? > > Currently anaconda is not acce

What’s new in Fedora CI

2020-10-14 Thread Michal Srb
Hello! There are some cool new features in Fedora CI that we would like to tell you about. First of all, Fedora CI now supports running tests using the new tmt format. The tmt tool provides better user experience for enabling, creating and running tests across different environments (e.g. vm, con

Fedora 33 compose report: 20201014.n.0 changes

2020-10-14 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-33-20201013.n.0 NEW: Fedora-33-20201014.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 11 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Fedora-Rawhide-20201014.n.0 compose check report

2020-10-14 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 24 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 95/181 (x86_64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-202

intending to retire thunderbird-enigmail in F34+

2020-10-14 Thread Felix Schwarz
Hey, Thunderbird 78 changed its tech stack and integrated OpenPGP support so the enigmail plugin does not work anymore. Enigmail 2.2.x does not contain any OpenPGP functionality besides a migration tool which migrates keys to Thunderbird's internal keyring. Since Thunderbird 78 was pushed to F31+

Fedora-33-20201014.0 compose check report

2020-10-14 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 7/181 (x86_64) ID: 694483 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso release_identification URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/694483 ID: 694544 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20201014.n.0 changes

2020-10-14 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201013.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201014.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 15 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 87 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 759.92 KiB Size of dropped packages:0

Re: libtasn1 >= 4.3 provided by libtasn1-4.16.0-1.fc32 ?

2020-10-14 Thread Roman Mohr
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 1:12 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 12:57:54PM +0200, Roman Mohr wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am playing with RPM dependency resolution and I came across this in the > > fc32 repos: > > > > # dnf -y deplist gnutls | grep libtasn1 > > Last metadata expir

Re: our containers with alias vim=vi

2020-10-14 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 13/10/20 16:04 +0200, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: On 10/13/20 12:34 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 13/10/20 07:45 +0200, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: On 10/12/20 5:15 PM, Joe Doss wrote: On 10/12/20 1:50 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: This would break using Vim when vim-minimal and vim-enhanced are installed (

Re: our containers with alias vim=vi

2020-10-14 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 13/10/20 07:38 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Jonathan Wakely said: Could vim-minimal and vim-enhanced both install the same /etc/profile.d/vim.sh file that did something like this? if [ -n "${BASH_VERSION-}" -o -n "${KSH_VERSION-}" -o -n "${ZSH_VERSION-}" ]; then [ "`/usr/b

Re: libtasn1 >= 4.3 provided by libtasn1-4.16.0-1.fc32 ?

2020-10-14 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 12:57:54PM +0200, Roman Mohr wrote: > Hi, > > I am playing with RPM dependency resolution and I came across this in the > fc32 repos: > > # dnf -y deplist gnutls | grep libtasn1 > Last metadata expiration check: 2:04:09 ago on Wed 14 Oct 2020 09:47:12 > CEST. > dependenc

Re: libtasn1 >= 4.3 provided by libtasn1-4.16.0-1.fc32 ?

2020-10-14 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 14.10.2020 12:57, Roman Mohr wrote: dependency: libtasn1 >= 4.3 provider: libtasn1-4.16.0-1.fc32.x86_64 Could someone explain to me why version 4.16.0 satisfies 4.3? Version 4.16.0 is higher than 4.3, that's why the expression X >= 4.3 will be TRUE. $ rpmdev-vercmp 4.16.0 4.3 4.16.0 > 4.3

libtasn1 >= 4.3 provided by libtasn1-4.16.0-1.fc32 ?

2020-10-14 Thread Roman Mohr
Hi, I am playing with RPM dependency resolution and I came across this in the fc32 repos: # dnf -y deplist gnutls | grep libtasn1 Last metadata expiration check: 2:04:09 ago on Wed 14 Oct 2020 09:47:12 CEST. dependency: libtasn1 >= 4.3 provider: libtasn1-4.16.0-1.fc32.i686 provider: libta

[Test-Announce] Fedora 33 Candidate RC-1.1 Available Now!

2020-10-14 Thread rawhide
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 33 Candidate RC-1.1 is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the curr

Fedora-Cloud-31-20201014.0 compose check report

2020-10-14 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

rlottie license change

2020-10-14 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
Hello all. License changed from "LGPLv2+ and MIT and FTL and BSD and MPLv1.1" to "MIT and FTL and BSD and MPLv1.1". -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: Fedora 33: pcscd and xrdp issue

2020-10-14 Thread Marius Schwarz
Am 13.10.20 um 13:30 schrieb Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 3:55 PM Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos > wrote: > >>> Second thing to chance: just ask, if a usable hw is found. Asking >>> permission for an impossible task is the definition of madnes >>> >>> Back to your request to chang

Re: Fedora 33: pcscd and xrdp issue

2020-10-14 Thread Marius Schwarz
Am 13.10.20 um 13:17 schrieb Jakub Jelen: > On 10/13/20 12:22 PM, Marius Schwarz wrote: >> >> captured with a brute force watch ps auxf >> log >> >> marius  5396  0.0  0.5 535000 10360 ?    Ssl  03:34   0:00  \_ >> /usr/libexec/gsd-smartcard >> >> >> btw.  Boxen seems to simulate a reader:

Fedora-Cloud-32-20201014.0 compose check report

2020-10-14 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201013.0): ID: 694448 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj

Re: nodejs-svgo dependencies

2020-10-14 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 12:13:18AM -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Hello team, > > I took over the maintenance of nodejs-svgo needed for Inkscape. > Unfortunately, two dependencies were retired due to lack of > maintenance: sax and js-ymal. The attempt to rebuild those packages > failed but the

nodejs-svgo dependencies

2020-10-14 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
Hello team, I took over the maintenance of nodejs-svgo needed for Inkscape. Unfortunately, two dependencies were retired due to lack of maintenance: sax and js-ymal. The attempt to rebuild those packages failed but the guideline for nodejs packages seems unclear with that line [1]: %prep %s

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2020-10-14) + Proposal to Cancel

2020-10-14 Thread Clement Verna
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 21:49, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 3:01 PM Fabio Valentini > wrote: > > > > Since there are no open tickets that are tagged with "meeting" and no new > > tickets are in need of synchronous discussion IMO, I propose to cancel > > tomorrow's meeting, and woul