News:
+ A pagure project has been created "fedora-btrfs" for overall
development and planning for Btrfs in Fedora.
https://pagure.io/fedora-btrfs/project/
This is to consolidate high level Btrfs related issues, and planning
for future Fedora releases. It can include issues related to
documentatio
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 17/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20200822.n.0):
ID: 646112 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/646112
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-33-2
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 03:08:50PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > Let's stop requiring Release bumps for each build. And let's put an
> > additional tag into Release, like proposed in [4]:
> >
> > "Release: 1%{?dist}%{?buildtag}"
> >
> > ... and let the build-sys
OLD: Fedora-33-20200822.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20200823.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 42
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 30.30 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On 23.08.20 04:26, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> While I understand the motivation behind the RFC (interoperability, safety
> against intentionally or unintentionally bad parameters), hardcoded
> parameters sound suspicious to me. How do we know that these are not chosen
> to allow the NSA or some other
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200822.0):
ID: 646055 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj
