Thanks Carson,
I'm up for that ...
See you in bugzilla ...
Cheers
Bob
On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 at 13:01, Carson Black wrote:
>
> Ello,
>
> The review process is documented on the wiki here:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
> In short, set the fedora-review flag on the bug
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 7:07 PM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> Since ~2 days ago, the rawhide koji buildroot has exhibited some
> *really weird* issues when building Java packages with maven (when
> building packages locally with "mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64
> --enablerepo local foo
Hi all,
I will be updating libkolabxml from 1.1.6 to 1.2.0 in Rawhide in 7 days.
The only dependency is kdepim, as far as I can see.
Let me know in the bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1869138 if you see any issues.
I have already committed the change in git, but not built the pa
Ello,
The review process is documented on the wiki here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
In short, set the fedora-review flag on the bug to ? when you're
reviewing a package. When you approve a package, change the flag to +.
I'll take this review swap. In return, I'd appreci
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1869060
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from Fedo
Hi,
I'm still not 100% sure that I'm able to approve a package - I have
"Fedora Packager GIT Commit Group (packager)", I've been through
sponsorship and I've had packages approved and released. If someone
can point out the doco on this point, I'd be grateful as my searches
haven't come up with any
Fabio Valentini wrote on 2020/08/16 23:24:
Hi everybody,
I've just noticed that bodhi allows users to create buildroot
overrides for F33 for no good reason (updates-testing is not even
active yet and updates to to stable directly). There's 41 (!) active
overrides for F33:
https://bodhi.fedorapr
OLD: Fedora-33-20200815.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20200816.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 36
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
Seems like an issue with bodhi during when we enabled gating on f33
and we enabled autosigning on f33.
For now I manually untagged them, which should fix with buildroot being wrong.
On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 10:24 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I've just noticed that bodhi allows
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 16:45:15 +0200
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Fedora has experimented with default modular streams for several
> releases and we seemed to be at an agreement that the experiment has
> failed:
>
> See https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2406 which includes links to
> relevant previous discuss
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 15:36:53 -0400
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> = Policies Regarding Modules in Fedora, Fedora ELN and EPEL
I find that all the discussion of non-ELN Fedora and EPEL distract
from the subject of ELN. The proposal would be clearer if it
restricted itself to ELN and left non-ELN fedo
Hi everybody,
I've just noticed that bodhi allows users to create buildroot
overrides for F33 for no good reason (updates-testing is not even
active yet and updates to to stable directly). There's 41 (!) active
overrides for F33:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/?search=&expired=False&re
On Sun, Aug 16, 2020, 15:49 J. Scheuirich wrote:
> $ fedpkg co wdune
> Cloning into 'wdune'...
> remote: Enumerating objects: 4992, done.
> remote: Counting objects: 100% (4992/4992), done.
> remote: Compressing objects: 100% (3647/3647), done.
> remote: Total 4992 (delta 1323), reused 4900 (delt
$ fedpkg co wdune
Cloning into 'wdune'...
remote: Enumerating objects: 4992, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (4992/4992), done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (3647/3647), done.
remote: Total 4992 (delta 1323), reused 4900 (delta 1277)
Receiving objects: 100% (4992/4992), 200.94 MiB | 503.
Till Maas wrote:
> what about other special cases when using 0.1 for the release to
> indicate pre-releases or git IDs for snapshots. How would that look
> like with your proposal?
None of that needs to change just because a buildtag is appended.
Whenever the source code changes in any way, one
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200814.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200816.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:54
Upgraded packages: 46
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.56 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 8:52 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 9:47 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 5:30 PM Paul Howarth wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 16:28:47 +0200
> > > Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > > - autoreconf fails because %build needs
17 matches
Mail list logo
