Dear project maintainers,
there is still a bunch of project that did not migrated to Weblate yet.
Zanata will be removed in a few weeks now, it's time to finish your migration
to Weblate.
It basically is a few questions to answer to allow me to do the first
configuration.
Requirements: store po
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 15:16:22 -0400,
Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PostgreSQL_13
== Summary ==
Update of PostgreSQL (`postgresql` and `libpq` components) in Fedora
from version 12 to version 13 in the non-modular (main) builds.
They are going to release 13beta3
On Sun, 2020-08-09 at 12:02 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 12:03 AM Jeff Law wrote:
> > So I've done two passes over the F33 build failures here:
> >
> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f33-failures.html
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Thanks for looking at the failures
On 8/9/20 3:16 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote:
Hello All,
Fedora 33 will be branched from rawhide on August 11th 2020 as per the
Fedora 33 schedule[1]. The process takes about a day and everything
should be ready by August 12th 2020. You can still be able to build
packages normally until then, but after
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200809.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200810.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:5
Upgraded packages: 91
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 7.39 MiB
Size of dropped packages:9.93
On Tue, 2020-08-04 at 21:36 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Jeff Law:
>
> > Actually, isn't it "just" 234MB. Still I'm surprised why that failed. Do
> > we
> > have more than one build running at a time on those boxes?
>
> It's a 32-bit build. I assume it's not the first large allocation.
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 6:55 PM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> Initially that was the bad thing, but the upstream project appears to
> have split those two libraries out, I'd prefer to keep tracking
> upstream in rawhide, maybe we can get upstream to address the lack of
> ABI in the disaster that is gl
Hi folks! Sending this with fairly wide distribution in the hopes of
finding someone with appropriate configuration.
There's a proposed blocker bug for F33:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830343
which reports a hang in the GNOME Shell VPN auth flow when trying to
connect to an OpenC
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 6:55 PM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 2:57 AM Leigh Scott > wrote:
> >
> > Yeah glslang sucks in terms of providing a stable API, I think
> > upstream would need to address these things,
> >
> > Though I hadn't realised it would FTBFS things that badly.
On Tue, 2020-08-04 at 14:47 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 8:50 AM Geoffrey Marr wrote:
>
> > At today's blocker review meeting[0], we ran across a bug[1] that we
> > believe is bad enough to warrant blocker status, but as the criteria
> > currently stand, does not violate any
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 9:08 am, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
Zbigniew, do you agree that we should remove the script if and only
if it is generated by NetworkManager? Otherwise, the change is only
partially-implemented for users upgrading from F32 and earlier.
We agreed to go with this approach
I'm updating Box2D in rawhide to 2.4.0 today. I can't find any consumers, but
I'm notifying anyway because I'm an upstanding citizen, yadda, yadda.
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
On Mon, 2020-08-10 at 09:59 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 09. 08. 20 0:02, Jeff Law wrote:
> > For any package which was failing and LTO appeared to be a factor, I've
> > assigned
> > the package's associated FTBFS BZ to me to address the LTO component. Some
> > of
> > those I've already fixed
Hi all,
CommOps received a request to build metrics for (1) what packages are
updated every Fedora release, and (2) how long on average package
reviews take; however, we do not have capacity to take this request. Per
discussion at Nest, I am following up on Fedora Infrastructure list to
explore if
Hi Dave,
at this point, we still don't have working ppc64le workers. Please see this
issue https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9059. Unfortunately, I
can't give you better information at the moment.
Silvie Chlupova
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 3:46 PM Dave Love
wrote:
> What's the state of
What's the state of ppc64le in copr? Is it coming back and, if so, is
there a timescale for that? Sorry I can't find the info about it from a
while back, but I thought things were meant to be restored by August.
It would definitely be more useful to me than s390x...
__
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 9:09 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 24. 06. 20 v 4:40 Przemek Klosowski via devel napsal(a):
> > dnf -C list extras
>
> How do I skip packages which are installed from @@commandline? Is there
> anything else than "grep -v"?
>
>
I am sorry but this is not an easy task with
Hi everybody,
I've seen some doxygen issues similar to this one in other packages,
but editorconfig seems to produce it quite regularly (though not
reproducibly). It happened once on ppc64le and once on x86_64 in
koschei:
error: Could not create output directory
/builddir/build/BUILD/editorconfig
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 2:57 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> Yeah glslang sucks in terms of providing a stable API, I think
> upstream would need to address these things,
>
> Though I hadn't realised it would FTBFS things that badly.
>
> Dave.
Can we revert back to the old version please?, it buil
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On 09. 08. 20 0:02, Jeff Law wrote:
For any package which was failing and LTO appeared to be a factor, I've assigned
the package's associated FTBFS BZ to me to address the LTO component. Some of
those I've already fixed and either closed the BZ or handed it back to the
default assignee for non-L
21 matches
Mail list logo
