Re: subtle issue with systemd, dnf 'greedy' obsoletes behaviour, and multiple repos

2020-06-01 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 02:10:12PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! openQA caught a subtle issue in a systemd update over the > weekend, and I thought it would be worth flagging up here both to let > people know about it and also to see if anyone has a better solution > than the one I came

Update on Rough Draft Implementation of KangarooTwelve

2020-06-01 Thread tsalim--- via devel
Dear Fedora Development Community, Hello Fedora Community! As I mentioned in my previous email I was working on an implementation of KangarooTwelve, a cryptographic hash function made by the same creators of the SHA-3 hash function. The implementation guidelines are currently a rough draft fea

Re: Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal: Drop mod_php

2020-06-01 Thread Remi Collet
Le 30/05/2020 à 11:13, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek a écrit : > Is mod_php a maintainance burder and/or a noticable installation > overhead when not used? And if it is, would additional help with the > maintainance that was offered make it easier to keep? Its maintainance is not much work, the pro

Re: Has something changed with RPMS?

2020-06-01 Thread drago01
On Tuesday, June 2, 2020, Adam Williamson wrote: > On June 1, 2020 7:13:51 p.m. PDT, Richard Shaw > wrote: > >I've noticed lately when doing mock builds that it takes a lot longer > >to > >install all the dependencies. Especially large -devel packages with > >tons of > >small files (boost-devel,

Re: Has something changed with RPMS?

2020-06-01 Thread Richard Shaw
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 9:37 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > On June 1, 2020 7:13:51 p.m. PDT, Richard Shaw > wrote: > >I've noticed lately when doing mock builds that it takes a lot longer > >to > >install all the dependencies. Especially large -devel packages with > >tons of > >small files (boost-d

Re: Has something changed with RPMS?

2020-06-01 Thread Adam Williamson
On June 1, 2020 7:13:51 p.m. PDT, Richard Shaw wrote: >I've noticed lately when doing mock builds that it takes a lot longer >to >install all the dependencies. Especially large -devel packages with >tons of >small files (boost-devel, vtk-devel, cmake-data). > >Checking on my NVME 970 EVO, all the

Has something changed with RPMS?

2020-06-01 Thread Richard Shaw
I've noticed lately when doing mock builds that it takes a lot longer to install all the dependencies. Especially large -devel packages with tons of small files (boost-devel, vtk-devel, cmake-data). Checking on my NVME 970 EVO, all the stats look good: SMART/Health Information (NVMe Log 0x02) Crit

FedoraRespin-32-updates-20200601.0 compose check report

2020-06-01 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Soas live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 3/39 (x86_64) ID: 608816 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/608816 ID: 608843 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso release_identification URL: https://openqa.fedora

Re: subtle issue with systemd, dnf 'greedy' obsoletes behaviour, and multiple repos

2020-06-01 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 01. 06. 20 23:10, Adam Williamson wrote: It was actually a bit tricky to come up with a solution for this. I hacked up a minimal reproducer with empty packages, and experimented a bit, and the solution I was able to find that works is to have systemd- udev Obsoletes: systemd < 245.6-1. This se

subtle issue with systemd, dnf 'greedy' obsoletes behaviour, and multiple repos

2020-06-01 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi folks! openQA caught a subtle issue in a systemd update over the weekend, and I thought it would be worth flagging up here both to let people know about it and also to see if anyone has a better solution than the one I came up with. The issue affects this systemd update for F32: https://bodhi.f

Fedora-IoT-32-20200601.0 compose check report

2020-06-01 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 11/11 (x86_64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200520.0): ID: 608806 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/608806 ID: 608808 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_greenboot U

Re: Fwd: Re: late generation of assemble code

2020-06-01 Thread Josh Stone
On 5/29/20 4:02 AM, Paul Dufresne via devel wrote: > * more space on the hard disks of the servers, because they contains > repositories only for LLVM IR packages rather than one by supported > architectures LLVM IR is not really arch-independent -- by the time you get to this level, all of the

New CoreOS Assembler release v0.8.1

2020-06-01 Thread Dusty Mabe
https://github.com/coreos/coreos-assembler/releases/tag/v0.8.1 Some highlights for this release: - Many UX improvements to `cosa run` - A lot of work around enhancing our support for GCP image uploads and manipulations. - Add support for offline installs - More multi-arch fixes and improvements

Summary for today's FESCo Meeting (2020-06-01)

2020-06-01 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-06-01/fesco.2020-06-01-15.00.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-06-01/fesco.2020-06-01-15.00.txt Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-06-01/fesco.2020-06-01-15.00.lo

[Bug 1841508] [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Number-Format

2020-06-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1841508 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from F

Fedora-IoT-33-20200601.0 compose check report

2020-06-01 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Passed openQA tests: 11/11 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an ema

Re: FSL license

2020-06-01 Thread Simo Sorce
On Sat, 2020-05-30 at 18:52 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Sat, May 30, 2020 12:07:35 +0100, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: > > On 30/05/2020 12:00, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > > > However, the License that the Oxford University has released it under > > > has certain clauses that make me unsure if it i

Upstream release monitoring can't handle files in dist-git?!?

2020-06-01 Thread Richard Shaw
When did this nonsense start happening? -- Forwarded message - From: Date: Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 7:12 AM Subject: [Bug 1842499] flmsg-4.0.15 is available To: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842499 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring < upstream-release-

Re: [HEADS UP] F33 Boost 1.73.0 rebuilds starting in a side tag

2020-06-01 Thread Kaleb Keithley
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 4:46 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > I'm starting the rebuilds for Boost 1.73.0 and packages that depend on > it, using the f33-boost side tag. > > Is this still in progress? I don't see that ceph-15.2.2 has been rebuilt nor is it being rebuilt now. Should I build the new rele

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200601.0 compose check report

2020-06-01 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Fedora-Cloud-32-20200601.0 compose check report

2020-06-01 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 608735 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/608735 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.i

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-06-01 Thread Dan Čermák
Miro Hrončok writes: > python-metaextract defolos This should be fixed in Rawhide as well. Cheers, Dan signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@l

Re: Many packages unnecessarily link to libpython

2020-06-01 Thread Honggang LI
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 11:31:23PM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 5/31/20 6:37 PM, Honggang LI wrote: > > We have to compile/build the module before we can import it from a > > python3 shell. The problem is how to compile the modules without pass > > "-lpython3.9" or "-lpython3.9d" to the linker

Re: looking for scipy on python 3.8 (RISCV Fedora Release 32)

2020-06-01 Thread Arun Sukumaran Latha
Thanks David, I could install tensorflow successfully with your help. Regards, Arun SL ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedo

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-06-01 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 01. 06. 20 4:14, Denis Arnaud wrote: Thanks for the follow up! | airinv airrac airtsp rmol sevmgr trademgen All those packages have been successfully rebuilt (after upstream upgrade): * airinv: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d6b3c81762 * airrac: https://bodhi.fedoraproje

Orphaning python-tgext-crud

2020-06-01 Thread Clement Verna
Hi all, I have just orphaned python-tgext-crud[0], as far as I can tell this package is not a dependency of any other package. $ sudo repoquery --whatdepends python3-tgext-crud There are currently 2 open bz for it [1] [0] - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-tgext-crud [1] - https://bugz

Re: looking for scipy on python 3.8 (RISCV Fedora Release 32)

2020-06-01 Thread Arun Sukumaran Latha
Thanks a Ton David, With these I could get Tensorflow working :) Regards, Arun SL ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedorapro

Re: Many packages unnecessarily link to libpython

2020-06-01 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 6/1/20 4:37 AM, Honggang LI wrote: On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 10:30:32AM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 5/31/20 1:24 AM, Honggang LI wrote: As you see, "-lpython3.9" or "-lpython3.9d" library must be provided to the linker. Otherwise, a lot of "undefined reference to xxx" error messages show u

Re: Many packages unnecessarily link to libpython

2020-06-01 Thread Honggang LI
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 09:37:39AM +0800, Honggang LI wrote: > On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 10:30:32AM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > On 5/31/20 1:24 AM, Honggang LI wrote: > > > As you see, "-lpython3.9" or "-lpython3.9d" library must be provided to > > > the linker. Otherwise, a lot of "undefined re