Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On Wed, 2020-05-27 at 10:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hah, so it seems you're ahead of me =) > > The live image build finally finished, but when I booted it to check > it, I found it includes both python3-3.8.3-1.fc33 and python3.9- > 3.9.0~b1-1.fc33.x86_64 . > > Digging into this I figu

Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: Soname bump of libb2 on F31/EPEL7

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 05:22:04PM -0400, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: > Scratch build of gtkhash does not appear to pull in libb2-0.98.1. Has > the buildroot override expired? > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45077601 > It did not expire: $ bodhi overrides query --builds libb2

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2020-05-28 16:00 UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2020-05-28 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2020-05-28 09:00 PDT US/Pacific 2020-05-28

Re: [Rawhide] Missing boost-python3-devel in repository

On 27/05/20 19:30 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: On 2020-05-26 3:48 a.m., Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 23/05/20 12:18 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: On 2020-05-23 11:20 a.m., Igor Raits wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sat, 2020-05-23 at 11:09 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200526.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200525.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200526.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:6 Upgraded packages: 74 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 22.17 MiB Size of dropped packages:31.7

Re: [Rawhide] Missing boost-python3-devel in repository

On 2020-05-26 3:48 a.m., Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 23/05/20 12:18 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: On 2020-05-23 11:20 a.m., Igor Raits wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sat, 2020-05-23 at 11:09 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: Hello team, It looks like the build syste

Re: Fedora 32 elections voting now open

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 6:22 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > Don't forget to claim your "I Voted" badge when you cast your ballot. Speaking of the badge, the hover text on it reads: I Voted: Fedora 32 -- Particpated in the Fedora 30 Elections! which doesn't seem quite right -- Jerry James http://ww

Re: Fedora 32 system-wide change proposal: reduce installation media size by improving the compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 6:03 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 5:32 AM Bohdan Khomutskyi wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > It was a long time since the last message in this change proposal. > > > > Recently I was working to reduce the impact of the increased compression > > ratio on

Fedora 32 elections voting now open

Voting in the Fedora 32 elections is now open. Go to the Elections app to cast[1] your vote. Voting closes at 23:59 UTC on Thursday 11 June. Don't forget to claim your "I Voted" badge when you cast your ballot. Links to candidate interviews are in the Elections app and on the Community Blog[2]. [1

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 27. 05. 20 20:24, Miro Hrončok wrote: I'm currently trying to build a live image, but it's running insanely slow for some reason, mock in general on my Rawhide box seems to be really slow and I'm not sure why. If it ever finishes I'll try it. But so far at least I see no problems. Hah, so it

gap-pkg-ferret license change

Version 1.0.3 of gap-pkg-ferret changes the license from "GPLv2+ and Public Domain" to "MPLv2.0 and Public Domain". I will build version 1.0.3 in Rawhide shortly. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraprojec

Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: Soname bump of libb2 on F31/EPEL7

Scratch build of gtkhash does not appear to pull in libb2-0.98.1. Has the buildroot override expired? https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45077601 On 5/26/20 1:49 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: > Mukundan, your package misses. > Please, rebuild `gtkhash` against `libb2-0.98.1` or

Re: TeXLive 2020 landing in rawhide

There are some new subpackages (and some old ones went away), but since every package had the release value bumped, this is expected. Tom On 2020-05-27 at 00:52, ke...@scrye.com wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 05:05:32PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > ...snip... > > > there is, IIRC, supposed t

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 27. 05. 20 19:27, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 16:22 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 01:20 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 22. 05. 20 20:05, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2020-05-22 at 19:57 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 22. 05. 20 19:23, Adam Williamson

Re: Presentation

I filled the review request here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840865 Le 27/05/2020 à 19:55, Vascom a écrit : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Create_Your_Review_Request ср, 27 мая 2020 г., 20:53 Yann Collette

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: glances

I did that yesterday, which appears to have got his attention. https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2396 On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:05 AM Richard Shaw wrote: > > I think it's time to submit a FESCo ticket per the guidelines. > > Thanks, > Richard > ___ > deve

Re: Presentation

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Create_Your_Review_Request ср, 27 мая 2020 г., 20:53 Yann Collette : > > Le 27/05/2020 à 17:39, Peter Lemenkov a écrit : > > Hello Yann! > > > > ср, 27 мая 2020 г. в 15:05, : > >> Hello, > >> > >> I just registered the Fedora

Re: Presentation

Le 27/05/2020 à 17:39, Peter Lemenkov a écrit : Hello Yann! ср, 27 мая 2020 г. в 15:05, : Hello, I just registered the Fedora devel list. My name is Yann Collette. I use Fedora distribution since ... (I started with a Linux 1.2.7 :) and stay attached to Redhat / Fedora for a lng time). I

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 16:22 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 01:20 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 22. 05. 20 20:05, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Fri, 2020-05-22 at 19:57 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > On 22. 05. 20 19:23, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > So a request

Re: F30 security update submitted for stable "marked obsolete" instead of being pushed

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 09:39:47AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > > Yeah, I think that'd be better then simply dropping them, if it's > > reasonably easy to implement. By releasing those updates we make > > things a bit nicer for users who are staying on a > > now-slightly-but-as-time-goes-on-more-an

Re: Presentation

Hello Yann! ср, 27 мая 2020 г. в 15:05, : > > Hello, > > I just registered the Fedora devel list. > My name is Yann Collette. > I use Fedora distribution since ... (I started with a Linux 1.2.7 :) and stay > attached to Redhat / Fedora for a lng time). > I use Fedora for music production and

Re: new packages review tickets

On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 10:35, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 12:45:56PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > It may sounds appealing to clean the plate and "resolve" a lot of > > tickets. However, think about it from the other side: somebody is > > waiting for review for

Re: Packages still using %{?_smp_mflags} manually?

On 05/27/2020 07:47 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 9:44 AM Tom Stellard > wrote: > > > Also, I used to use %make_build without the {}, but someone suggested[1] I > add the {} in case the macro ever became a function. > > -Tom > > [

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: glances

I think it's time to submit a FESCo ticket per the guidelines. Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject

Re: Packages still using %{?_smp_mflags} manually?

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 9:44 AM Tom Stellard wrote: > > Also, I used to use %make_build without the {}, but someone suggested[1] I > add the {} in case the macro ever became a function. > > -Tom > > [1] > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Digest-SHA/pull-request/1#comment-37158 Well the p

Re: Packages still using %{?_smp_mflags} manually?

On 05/27/2020 05:19 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:12 PM Tom Stellard > wrote: > > On 05/21/2020 07:57 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > Not really a big deal but %build_make has been available for quite a > while. I noticed a few of my package

Re: F30 security update submitted for stable "marked obsolete" instead of being pushed

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 9:29 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 03:12:44PM +0200, Marius Schwarz wrote: > > Am 27.05.20 um 08:25 schrieb Artur Iwicki: > > > While I understand the mechanism, I think that this needs to be > communicated more clearly

Re: new packages review tickets

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 12:45:56PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > It may sounds appealing to clean the plate and "resolve" a lot of > tickets. However, think about it from the other side: somebody is > waiting for review for years, then a ping will come, and if he > responds, then ... nothing. Just

Re: F30 security update submitted for stable "marked obsolete" instead of being pushed

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 03:12:44PM +0200, Marius Schwarz wrote: > Am 27.05.20 um 08:25 schrieb Artur Iwicki: > > While I understand the mechanism, I think that this needs to be > > communicated more clearly. I've been a packager for close to 3 years now > > and I admit until I read this e-mail I

Re: F30 security update submitted for stable "marked obsolete" instead of being pushed

Am 27.05.20 um 08:25 schrieb Artur Iwicki: > While I understand the mechanism, I think that this needs to be communicated > more clearly. I've been a packager for close to 3 years now and I admit until > I read this e-mail I wasn't quite sure whether "no updates after EOL" meant > "you can't sub

Presentation

Hello, I just registered the Fedora devel list. My name is Yann Collette. I use Fedora distribution since ... (I started with a Linux 1.2.7 :) and stay attached to Redhat / Fedora for a lng time). I use Fedora for music production and I manage a Fedora COPR repo to provide tools related to m

Re: Packages still using %{?_smp_mflags} manually?

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:12 PM Tom Stellard wrote: > On 05/21/2020 07:57 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > Not really a big deal but %build_make has been available for quite a > while. I noticed a few of my packages still supply _smp_mflags manually. > > > > Is this worth a script and automatic BZ? P

Default BLAS/LAPACK implementation + runtime exchangeable backends

Hi, I didn't find this proposal in the archives, so let me add something to this discussion. Does anyone know about FlexiBLAS [1]? It seems like the perfect solution to this problem, and AFAIK, only Arch packages it. Here's a presentation [2] about it (not up-to-date with the current feature-set,

Re: new packages review tickets

Dne 24. 05. 20 v 10:02 Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a): > - following the Policy for stalled package reviews [1], I would like to > mass comment on tickets submitted before 1/1/2017 (more than 3 years > old) asking the submitter if they're still interested in continue with > the review process

Fedora-Cloud-32-20200527.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 606014 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/606014 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.i

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 33 Python 3.9 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 22. 05. 20 3:06, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.9, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a side tag. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9 If you see a "Rebuilt for Python 3.9" (or similar) commit in your package, please don't rebuild it in regular raw

Single-threaded OpenBLAS is not thread-safe

Hi, I wanted to bring some attention to this in devel, not only to openblas' maintainer (in CC), because there have been some discussions around BLAS/LAPACK in the past here. As Dave Love pointed out in a previous discussion, generally, parallelization is made at the top level and then you simply

Re: Increasing the packaging team: regular workshops/vFADs/classroom sessions on packaging

Dne 21. 05. 20 v 10:52 Ankur Sinha napsal(a): > Hi folks, > > The packaging team is generally quite stretched, and we frankly need > more people helping us out. > > The main issue with newcomers taking on packaging is that the learning > curve here is much more technical then a lot of other areas

Re: Location of executable code

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:43 PM Przemek Klosowski via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On 5/23/20 12:18 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > Would the time be better spent enhancing SELinux? > > ThatSELinux already labels everything in /bin and /usr/libexec as > > system_u:object

Re: How to debug live CD image?

> On 24 May 2020, at 21:55, Paul Dufresne via devel > wrote: > > Le 20-05-24 à 05 h 47, Barry Scott a écrit : >> ... >> But I cannot boot a live CD image as it gets stuck >> in "Monitoring of LVM2 mirrors, ...". This is not a >> new problem I have seen this for a couple of Fedora >> releases,

Re: F30 security update submitted for stable "marked obsolete" instead of being pushed

On Wednesday, 27 May 2020 at 10:22, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 27. 05. 20 9:43, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > On Wednesday, 27 May 2020 at 01:08, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 27. 05. 20 0:56, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > > > Can someone explain why my update[1] which was subm

Re: Packages still using %{?_smp_mflags} manually?

Am Donnerstag, den 21.05.2020, 17:53 +0200 schrieb Igor Raits: > > In the spec file of another one that I've inherited, I see "make V=1 > > %{?_smp_mflags}". > > %make_build V=1 Not even neccessary since `V=1` already gets injected by the `%make_build` macro at least since F32: $ rpm -E %make_bu

Re: Help needed with Fedora Python Classroom Lab container image

On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 10:09, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 27. 05. 20 9:12, Clement Verna wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 01:23, Miro Hrončok > > wrote: > > > > Hello. > > > > There is a docker/podman container image part of the Fedora Python > Classroom

Re: F30 security update submitted for stable "marked obsolete" instead of being pushed

On 27. 05. 20 9:43, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Wednesday, 27 May 2020 at 01:08, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 27. 05. 20 0:56, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: Can someone explain why my update[1] which was submitted for F30 stable was not pushed but "marked obsolete"? It was a secu

Re: F30 security update submitted for stable "marked obsolete" instead of being pushed

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 23:16 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > On Tuesday, May 26, 2020 9:56:48 PM MST Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 5/26/20 8:13 PM, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday, May 26, 2020 4:08:52 PM MST Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > >

pam: removing libdb

Hi, I'm facing a bugzilla [1] that asks to remove libdb dependency from pam package and to change it to NDBM. So, I'd like to hear feedback from the community. Is anybody using pam_userdb module? From those who are using it, which database are you using? Will you have to migrate from one database

Re: Help needed with Fedora Python Classroom Lab container image

On 27. 05. 20 9:12, Clement Verna wrote: On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 01:23, Miro Hrončok > wrote: Hello. There is a docker/podman container image part of the Fedora Python Classroom Lab: https://labs.fedoraproject.org/en/python-classroom I need he

Re: F30 security update submitted for stable "marked obsolete" instead of being pushed

On Wednesday, 27 May 2020 at 01:08, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 27. 05. 20 0:56, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > Can someone explain why my update[1] which was submitted for F30 > > stable was not pushed but "marked obsolete"? It was a security > > update, too. > > > > [1] https://bodhi.fed

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: glances

Hi, If you just need to install glances, you can use my copr: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/tartare/glances/ which have an up to date version for fedora, el7 and el8. Cheers, Didier. Le 26/05/2020 à 16:43, Breno Brand Fernandes a écrit : > I also had filed this ticket, back in Oct/201

Re: Help needed with Fedora Python Classroom Lab container image

On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 01:23, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello. > > There is a docker/podman container image part of the Fedora Python > Classroom Lab: > >https://labs.fedoraproject.org/en/python-classroom > > I need help with two main issues: > > > 1) The container doesn't built for Fedora 32: >