No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
On 29. 04. 20 16:27, Tomas Orsava wrote:
Hello everyone.
I’m working on a change to rename pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y, e.g. python39
to python3.9.
*Motivation:*
When you install an additional Python interpreter, the command that runs it
contains a dot (e.g. /usr/bin/python3.9) but the pac
On 07. 05. 20 20:58, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Seems reasonable to me. I'd not push it to stable releases, but seems
fine to land in rawhide.
Yes, I was only imagining this for rawhide.
Want to work up a PR? or I guess wait for discussion a bit more.
I am waiting for more discussion (particularly
Hi folks,
I'm packaging tpcclib (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832562)
and as per the review, I wanted to confirm the licence for tpcclib (
https://gitlab.utu.fi/vesoik/tpcclib/-/blob/master/license.md)
Should it be "GPLv2+ and GPLv3+ "or something else?
Thanks,
__
> In the rare occasion that I need to make downstream-only changes with
> patches, I usually just explode the upstream tarball, run "git init",
> then "git add .", "git commit -m import", apply my changes, and then
> do "git diff --patch > ../00-my-changes.patch" (if it's just one
> commit), or "
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200505.0):
ID: 594388 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/594388
Passed openQA tests:
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 03:12:08PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
...snip...
>
> Can we please have modular repos in separate package again?
>
> Basically revert this plus some extra comps/kickstarts changes:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-repos/c/7b32bee388d093c446017f1e33309d9b96b24
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 08:39:19PM +0200, clime wrote:
...snip... please folks... please trim your posts? :)
> These are some great stats!
>
> But I would like to note that exploded repos (or source-git repos)
> have at least two other advantages.
>
> 1) they consume less space than tarballs fo
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 03:26:59PM -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> Tomas Tomecek writes:
>
> > Thank you all for raising all the questions and concerns.
> >
> > Before I reply, I'd like to stress that we are still in a prototype
> > phase - not everything is solved (clearly) and at this point, we
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 03:28:25PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> churchyard suggested we add a "Feedback" section to the Change
> proposal template[1]. I see two benefits to this:
>
> 1. It provides FESCo a useful summary of the community feedback (and
> in particular the reasoning behind rejecting a
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 06:46:48PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
...snip...
>
> The latest tag for a source package name wins for the Koji-generatged
> repository. I don't know what happens if different source packages
> build subpackages of the same name.
koji operates on source packages, so as
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 02:44:59AM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Some time ago, I reset my Fedora notifications to the defaults
> (previously it was just stuff from before I was a packager). As a
> member of various SIGs, this means I get a lot of notifications for
> packages
El jue., 7 may. 2020 a las 18:04, Ian McInerney ()
escribió:
> I'll swap my git-revise (
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830306) package for
> python-ovirt-engine-sdk4. And if no one else needs a swap I could also take
> sqm-scripts.
>
> I will hopefully do the review in the next fe
On 07. 05. 20 16:13, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 06. 05. 20 v 15:12 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
This has downsides: When the files are changed in next update, I won't get them
updated, because they are shipped as
%config(noreplace). (If they were not shipped as %config(noreplace), it would
be even w
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 6:39 PM Jerry James wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 10:26 AM Jerry James wrote:
> > For the latter error, see
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-615, which claims that
> > "the JDK issue has been resolved" without specifying how it was
> > resolved.
>
> Th
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 10:26 AM Jerry James wrote:
> For the latter error, see
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-615, which claims that
> "the JDK issue has been resolved" without specifying how it was
> resolved.
They're probably talking about
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 33 Rawhide 20200507.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 10:24 AM Jerry James wrote:
> I am having exactly the same problem with antlr3 and stringtemplate4.
> A web search shows that adding 8 to the
> maven-javadoc-plugin configuration is supposed to fix the problem, but
> for antlr3 and stringtemplate4 that just changes the failu
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 10:16 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
> I adopted the maven-verifier-plugin package a while ago because it's a
> dependency of a dependency of a package I care about and I didn't want
> it to get retired. Now it is time to pay the piper. With the Java 11
> change[1], maven-verifier-plu
I adopted the maven-verifier-plugin package a while ago because it's a
dependency of a dependency of a package I care about and I didn't want
it to get retired. Now it is time to pay the piper. With the Java 11
change[1], maven-verifier-plugin fails to build. I know even less
about Java than I do a
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 4:03 PM Juan Orti Alcaine
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking for these packages to be reviewed. Anyone interested in some
> reviews in exchange?
>
> python-ovirt-engine-sdk4 - Python SDK for version 4 of the oVirt Engine API
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=183297
Hey folks,
Good news, I have an update on the future of Fedora community apps. I wrote
up this post to outline where things are at, and where we hope for them to
go.
https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/the-future-of-fedora-community-apps/
Hope everyone is staying healthy and happy!
Best,
Ma
Hello,
I'm looking for these packages to be reviewed. Anyone interested in some
reviews in exchange?
python-ovirt-engine-sdk4 - Python SDK for version 4 of the oVirt Engine API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832979
sqm-scripts - Traffic shaper scripts of the CeroWrt project
https:/
Vít Ondruch writes:
> Dne 06. 05. 20 v 20:39 clime napsal(a):
>> On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 13:21, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 10:37 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 05. 05. 20 v 18:37 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 5:06 PM Tomas Tomecek wrote:
Dne 06. 05. 20 v 15:12 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> This has downsides: When the files are changed in next update, I won't get
> them updated, because they are shipped as
> %config(noreplace). (If they were not shipped as %config(noreplace), it would
> be even worse, as my changes would be
> overrid
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 10:24 PM Simo Sorce wrote:
> Well, a way to allow force pushes would be to have a git hook that
> branches the tree before the force push. (creating a branch named
> something like audit-force-push-)
> That way you can retain data for legal/auditing reasons, while allowing
>
Welcome Hunor o/
On Thu, 7 May 2020 at 10:57, Hunor Csomortáni wrote:
> Hello Fedora People,
>
> I'm Hunor Csomortáni and this is my long due self introduction to the
> community.
>
> I'm working at Red Hat and I've been a member of the Packit team since
> February. This means I'm going to spend
On Thu, 7 May 2020 at 06:54, clime wrote:
>
> Dne čt 7. kvě 2020 12:19 uživatel Vít Ondruch napsal:
>>
>>
>> Dne 06. 05. 20 v 20:39 clime napsal(a):
>> > On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 13:21, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>> >> On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 10:37 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Dne 05. 05. 20 v 1
Hi everyone!
Just in case you didn't catch the CPE Weekly mail last week and you have
interest in stopping by, I will be hosting a CPE PO Office Hours slot from
1400-1500 UTC on #fedora-meeting-1.
There is no agenda for this slot, it is open to finding out more about what
the CPE team are working
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
Dne čt 7. kvě 2020 12:19 uživatel Vít Ondruch napsal:
>
> Dne 06. 05. 20 v 20:39 clime napsal(a):
> > On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 13:21, Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 10:37 AM Vít Ondruch
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Dne 05. 05. 20 v 18:37 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
> On Mon, May
On 06. 05. 20 11:19, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 6:16 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
In what way does keeping the spec file in our fork help us?
(speechless for like a minute)
I don't really understand this comment. Speechless because our workflow is
tedious?
I just couldn't underst
Dne 06. 05. 20 v 20:39 clime napsal(a):
> On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 13:21, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>> On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 10:37 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>>
>>> Dne 05. 05. 20 v 18:37 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 5:06 PM Tomas Tomecek wrote:
Hi Tomas,
I'
Hello Fedora People,
I'm Hunor Csomortáni and this is my long due self introduction to the community.
I'm working at Red Hat and I've been a member of the Packit team since
February. This means I'm going to spend more time in Fedora-space than
before.
Previously I was doing automation and testin
Michel Alexandre Salim writes:
> Would anyone like to swap a review?
>
> psi-notify - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832623
Looks simple enough, I'll try to review it today. If I don't manage to,
anyone else can take the review.
___
devel
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 594200 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/594200
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.i
* Fabio Valentini:
> In the rare occasion that I need to make downstream-only changes with
> patches, I usually just explode the upstream tarball, run "git init",
> then "git add .", "git commit -m import", apply my changes, and then
> do "git diff --patch > ../00-my-changes.patch" (if it's just o
* Pierre-Yves Chibon:
> On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 08:39:19PM +0200, clime wrote:
>> But I would like to note that exploded repos (or source-git repos)
>> have at least two other advantages.
>>
>> 1) they consume less space than tarballs for each version because
>> objects in git repo are deduplicat
38 matches
Mail list logo
