Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-27 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 27. 04. 20 v 19:40 Daniel Mach napsal(a): > > > Dne 27. 04. 20 v 19:00 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): >> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:47 AM Daniel Mach wrote: > >> >>> Since I'm part of RPM team too, I hope they won't mind if I'll speak >>> for >>> them :) Don't you rather want to work with us on

Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-27 Thread Petr Pisar
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 04:33:52PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 4:04 PM Petr Pisar wrote: > > (2) Is it possible to override them on a per-package basis? > > > > E.g. I have ncurses in global.yaml: > > > > - name: ncurses > > description: Add support for ncurses. >

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)

2020-04-27 Thread Dan Čermák
Sérgio Basto writes: > On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 12:39 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> GConf2 > > GConf2 is orphan, why ? no maintainers or a task force to be removed ? GConf2 has been deprecated for well over a decade and afaik unmaintained for nearly half a decade. Thus: please just remove it from y

Re: Self Introduction: Jude Lee / judescripts

2020-04-27 Thread Robin Lee
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:43 AM Jude Lee wrote: > > Hi! my name is Jude and I am a fullstack / architect (github.com/judescripts > | linkedin.com/in/leejude). > > This is first time joining a fedora group and I've been wanting to become a > part of the open source project community for awhile n

Re: Previous awesome background images

2020-04-27 Thread Jeremy Linton
Hi, On 4/17/20 4:43 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 17. 04. 20 16:07, Kamil Paral wrote: I'm disappointed with default wallpapers in the latest releases. I wonder if we could go back to more artistic images from previous releases? Here are some of my favorite ones: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/W

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)

2020-04-27 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 12:39 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > GConf2 GConf2 is orphan, why ? no maintainers or a task force to be removed ? Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to de

Self Introduction: Jude Lee / judescripts

2020-04-27 Thread Jude Lee
Hi! my name is Jude and I am a fullstack / architect (github.com/judescripts | linkedin.com/in/leejude). This is first time joining a fedora group and I've been wanting to become a part of the open source project community for awhile now. I've mostly worked with debian based distros and some arc

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)

2020-04-27 Thread Jerry James
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 4:40 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > https://fedoraprojec

Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-27 Thread clime
Few more notes: I think an idea that build system could be simply passing --with/--without options on mock's command-line should be considered...then basically no change in spec files is needed (i.e. no syntax change). It would be great if rpm remembered either the rpmbuild's command-line in case

Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-27 Thread clime
On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 at 13:21, Petr Šabata wrote: > > Based on the recent discussions around %fedora/%rhel macros and ELN, > and %bcond generally being confusing to work with, I came up with a > distribution-wide feature that defines generic feature keywords and > associated helper macros that pack

FedoraRespin-31-updates-20200427.0 compose check report

2020-04-27 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 3/37 (x86_64) ID: 588095 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso release_identification URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/588095 ID: 588117 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/588117 ID

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)

2020-04-27 Thread Martin Jackson
I would be happy to maintain it -and it looks like it needs an epel8 build.  (FAS: mhjacks) Thanks, Marty On 4/27/20 2:13 PM, David Cantrell wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:39:38PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: ckermit orphan   2 weeks ago I took ownership of this on

Re: HEADS UP: repoquery --whatrequires yields incomplete results when run from Fedora 32+

2020-04-27 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:03 PM Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > > > On 4/3/20 4:47 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 11. 03. 20 17:25, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> I have upgraded to Fedora 32 today and after a while I have noticed > >> that `repoquery --whatrequires` yields incomplete results. > >> >

Re: HEADS UP: repoquery --whatrequires yields incomplete results when run from Fedora 32+

2020-04-27 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
On 4/3/20 4:47 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 11. 03. 20 17:25, Miro Hrončok wrote: I have upgraded to Fedora 32 today and after a while I have noticed that `repoquery --whatrequires` yields incomplete results.  From Fedora 31: $ dnf --refresh repoquery --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires

Re: f32-backgrounds look like crap

2020-04-27 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 17:52 +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote: > At the same time I also liked to hear some of reasoning behind the reasons > for the > wallpaper. IMHO it is shame that at least a short abstract it is not > available here. https://pagure.io/design/issue/669 -- Adam Williamson Fedo

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)

2020-04-27 Thread David Cantrell
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:39:38PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: ckermit orphan 2 weeks ago I took ownership of this one and have fixed it in rawhide. If anyone really wants to own this one, just let me know. I have no problems turning it over

Logs for the Open NeuroFedora Meeting: 1800 UTC on Monday, 28th April

2020-04-27 Thread Aniket Pradhan
Hey there! Thanks, everyone for attending the meeting. We shall meet in two weeks' time, which is 12th May 2020, at 1800 UTC. Links to the logs from today's meeting: * https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-neuro/2020-04-27/neurofedora.2020-04-27-18.01.log.html * https://meetbot.fedoraproject

Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?

2020-04-27 Thread Steven Munroe
Dan writes: >> Dave Love writes: >> Well, what I've already said from some experience and research. Where's the >> POWER and >>S390 support? All I saw is x86 and arm. We've heard there's >> ppc64le compatibility support >>anyhow, which is rising > >gcc provides compat x86 intrinsics via "x86intri

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2020-04-27)

2020-04-27 Thread Aleksandra Fedorova
#fedora-meeting-1: fesco Meeting started by bookwar at 15:00:30 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-04-27/fesco.2020-04-27-15.00.log.html Meeting summary --- * init process (

Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?

2020-04-27 Thread Steven Munroe
Kevin Kofler wrote >>Florian Weimer wrote: >>... >> In general, that is not true. You can use the target function attribute and function >> multiversioning instead in many cases. >This may (or may not) have been recently fixed, but last I checked, intrinsics for a vector >instruction set XYZ2 wer

Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-27 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
Le lundi 27 avril 2020 à 19:12 +0200, Petr Šabata a écrit : > > Yes, this is exactly what I'm trying to achieve -- to have > distribution-wide generic keywords that control default build options > in packages It can be done at the rpm layer and in fact there are already quite a lot of such tunabl

Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-27 Thread Daniel Mach
Dne 27. 04. 20 v 19:00 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:47 AM Daniel Mach wrote: I'm wondering if this is your personal initiative or if you're sync with ELN people. I emailed them in January about the very same idea (and I used the very same name; we both seem to like

Re: f32-backgrounds look like crap

2020-04-27 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Friday, 17 April 2020 19.05.40 WEST Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > I really do not see how you could construct this reply from Michael's. > He clearly starts with IMO and the rest of is the expression of his opinion, > he never calls anyone anything. > > I'm confused here. > > Pierre I left this

Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?

2020-04-27 Thread Jun Aruga
> gcc provides compat x86 intrinsics via "x86intrin.h", they were > successfully used eg. by darktable (raw photo sw) Okay. Thanks for the info. -- Jun | He - His - Him ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an emai

Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-27 Thread Petr Šabata
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 6:38 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 27. 04. 20 v 16:25 Petr Šabata napsal(a): > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 3:01 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> > >> Dne 27. 04. 20 v 13:19 Petr Šabata napsal(a): > >>> Based on the recent discussions around %fedora/%rhel macros and ELN, > >>> an

Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?

2020-04-27 Thread Jun Aruga
> They're packages for a header-only system, not libraries, hence my confusion. Hi Dave, okay. > Who's pushing this, and how do I present an HPC performance engineering perspective? I appreciate your interest in the bioinformatics in HPC. The simde Fedora package: Me The simde Debian package: Mi

Node.js 14 in F33

2020-04-27 Thread Zuzana Svetlikova
Node.js v14.x was released last week, which should become LTS in autumn. modular builds for stable releases and rawhide are already submitted in Bodhi and should be available soon. I'd like to make it the default stream for F33 once it's tested a bit. I'd like to ask maintainers and users of nodej

Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-27 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:47 AM Daniel Mach wrote: > > I'm wondering if this is your personal initiative or if you're sync with > ELN people. I emailed them in January about the very same idea (and I > used the very same name; we both seem to like Gentoo), we exchanged > couple emails, but never

Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-27 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 27. 04. 20 v 16:25 Petr Šabata napsal(a): > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 3:01 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: >> >> Dne 27. 04. 20 v 13:19 Petr Šabata napsal(a): >>> Based on the recent discussions around %fedora/%rhel macros and ELN, >>> and %bcond generally being confusing to work with, I came up with a >

Re: dropping NSS DBM format support in F33+

2020-04-27 Thread Ondrej Mosnacek
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 5:54 PM Paul Moore wrote: > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 1:21 PM Justin Forbes wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 10:21 AM Daiki Ueno wrote: > > > > > > Hello Ondrej, > > > > > > Ondrej Mosnacek writes: > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 11:12 PM Ondrej Mosnacek > > > >

Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?

2020-04-27 Thread Dan Horák
On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 16:23:39 +0100 Dave Love wrote: > Jun Aruga writes: > > >> > For the better user experience, we are promoting the system > >> > library for both RPM and Debian based Linux distributions. > >> > >> What system library, for what purpose? > > > > Hi Dave, > > The simde system l

Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?

2020-04-27 Thread Dave Love
Jun Aruga writes: >> > For the better user experience, we are promoting the system library >> > for both RPM and Debian based Linux distributions. >> >> What system library, for what purpose? > > Hi Dave, > The simde system library is > > * simde-devel in Fedora and EPEL [1] > * libsimde-dev in D

Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?

2020-04-27 Thread Dave Love
Kevin Kofler writes: > Florian Weimer wrote: >> In general, that is not true. You can use the target function attribute >> and function multiversioning instead in many cases. > > This may (or may not) have been recently fixed, but last I checked, > intrinsics for a vector instruction set XYZ2 w

Unannounced soname bump: gecode

2020-04-27 Thread Jerry James
The gecode package was updated from version 5.1.0 to version 6.2.0 yesterday. The update came with an soname bump, which was not announced on fedora-devel-list; see: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#_rawhide_devel_master This broke the mp package, at least, which I will

Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-27 Thread Daniel Mach
I'm wondering if this is your personal initiative or if you're sync with ELN people. I emailed them in January about the very same idea (and I used the very same name; we both seem to like Gentoo), we exchanged couple emails, but never got an answer if this is the way to go. Since I have a lot

Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-27 Thread Daniel Mach
I'm wondering if this is your personal initiative or if you're sync with ELN people. I emailed them in January about the very same idea (and I used the very same name; we both seem to like Gentoo), we exchanged couple emails, but never got an answer if this is the way to go. Since I have a lot

Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-27 Thread Petr Šabata
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 4:04 PM Petr Pisar wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 01:19:29PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote: > > Details in the gist: > > https://gist.github.com/contyk/0f0585c57976ca18a293b3566408 > > > I'm very interested in overriding the global settings: > > (1) Is it possible to ove

Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-27 Thread Petr Šabata
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 3:01 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 27. 04. 20 v 13:19 Petr Šabata napsal(a): > > Based on the recent discussions around %fedora/%rhel macros and ELN, > > and %bcond generally being confusing to work with, I came up with a > > distribution-wide feature that defines generic

Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-27 Thread Petr Šabata
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 3:42 PM Robin Lee wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 7:21 PM Petr Šabata wrote: > > > > Based on the recent discussions around %fedora/%rhel macros and ELN, > > and %bcond generally being confusing to work with, I came up with a > > distribution-wide feature that defines g

Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-27 Thread Petr Šabata
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 2:15 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 01:19:29PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote: > > Based on the recent discussions around %fedora/%rhel macros and ELN, > > and %bcond generally being confusing to work with, I came up with a > > distribution-wide feature

Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-27 Thread Petr Pisar
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 01:19:29PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote: > Details in the gist: > https://gist.github.com/contyk/0f0585c57976ca18a293b3566408 > I'm very interested in overriding the global settings: (1) Is it possible to override them from a modulemd when building a module? I guess the as

Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-27 Thread Robin Lee
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 7:21 PM Petr Šabata wrote: > > Based on the recent discussions around %fedora/%rhel macros and ELN, > and %bcond generally being confusing to work with, I came up with a > distribution-wide feature that defines generic feature keywords and > associated helper macros that pa

Re: coreos-assembler v0.8.0

2020-04-27 Thread Micah Abbott
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 4:01 PM Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > On 4/25/20 6:50 AM, Micah Abbott wrote: > > The CoreOS team is pleased to announce the latest release of > > `coreos-assembler` - our opinionated build tool that we use to build > > and test Fedora CoreOS and Red Hat CoreOS. > > > >

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200426.n.1 changes

2020-04-27 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200425.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200426.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 4 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 83 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 969.71 KiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?

2020-04-27 Thread Kevin Kofler
Florian Weimer wrote: > In general, that is not true. You can use the target function attribute > and function multiversioning instead in many cases. This may (or may not) have been recently fixed, but last I checked, intrinsics for a vector instruction set XYZ2 were only available with the cor

Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-27 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 27. 04. 20 v 13:19 Petr Šabata napsal(a): > Based on the recent discussions around %fedora/%rhel macros and ELN, > and %bcond generally being confusing to work with, I came up with a > distribution-wide feature that defines generic feature keywords and > associated helper macros that packages

tuxanci-0.21.0 license corrected to GPL+

2020-04-27 Thread Petr Pisar
When fixing a build failure of a tuxanci package I noticed a license tag is not correct and changed it from "GPLv2" to "GPL+". -- Petr signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?

2020-04-27 Thread Richard Shaw
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 7:26 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:52 AM Richard Shaw > wrote: > > Could we treat them like arches? > > Something like: > > X86_64 & X86_64-AVX2 > > armv7hf & armv7fh-NEON > > etc... > > > > It would absolutely have to be OPT IN because once yo

Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?

2020-04-27 Thread Florian Weimer
* Kevin Kofler: > Jun Aruga wrote: >> simde is a header files only library. It's not a binary. > > Then it is inherently unsuitable for automatic runtime selection, and > all the runtime selection still has to be done in the client program. > > GCC requires you to compile for separate vector instr

Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2020-04-27)

2020-04-27 Thread Aleksandra Fedorova
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2020-04-27 15:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be d

Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?

2020-04-27 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:52 AM Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 9:28 AM Artur Iwicki wrote: >> >> Regarding x86_64 and AVX2, last year we had a very heated discussion about >> this on the mailing list. >> >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject

Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-27 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 01:19:29PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote: > Based on the recent discussions around %fedora/%rhel macros and ELN, > and %bcond generally being confusing to work with, I came up with a > distribution-wide feature that defines generic feature keywords and > associated helper macros

Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-27 Thread Petr Šabata
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 1:24 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 7:21 AM Petr Šabata wrote: > > > > Based on the recent discussions around %fedora/%rhel macros and ELN, > > and %bcond generally being confusing to work with, I came up with a > > distribution-wide feature that defines

Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?

2020-04-27 Thread Jun Aruga
> > For the better user experience, we are promoting the system library > > for both RPM and Debian based Linux distributions. > > What system library, for what purpose? Hi Dave, The simde system library is * simde-devel in Fedora and EPEL [1] * libsimde-dev in Debian [2] The purpose is to build

Re: RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-27 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 7:21 AM Petr Šabata wrote: > > Based on the recent discussions around %fedora/%rhel macros and ELN, > and %bcond generally being confusing to work with, I came up with a > distribution-wide feature that defines generic feature keywords and > associated helper macros that pa

RFC: Feature macros (aka USE flags)

2020-04-27 Thread Petr Šabata
Based on the recent discussions around %fedora/%rhel macros and ELN, and %bcond generally being confusing to work with, I came up with a distribution-wide feature that defines generic feature keywords and associated helper macros that packages can check in build-time conditionals. The key advantag

Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?

2020-04-27 Thread Dave Love
Jun Aruga writes: > For the better user experience, we are promoting the system library > for both RPM and Debian based Linux distributions. What system library, for what purpose? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe s

Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?

2020-04-27 Thread Dave Love
Jun Aruga writes: > You do not need to care about the availability by arch or compiler > when using this library. As far as I can tell, it doesn't do dynamic dispatch. Experimentally, if you build with -mavx2 and run on ivybridge (or for skx and run on haswell), the test code generates illegal

Re: Fedora election schedule update

2020-04-27 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 23. 04. 20 22:30, Ben Cotton wrote: Haha, I tried to plan! Due to a change in the infrastructure move timeline, the Elections app will now be available during the originally-scheduled time. Instead of delaying the elections further, we will just pretend I never made any changes and hold to the

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (anaconda also affected)

2020-04-27 Thread Miro Hrončok
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Fedora-Cloud-32-20200427.0 compose check report

2020-04-27 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 587599 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/587599 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.i

Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?

2020-04-27 Thread Kevin Kofler
Jun Aruga wrote: > simde is a header files only library. It's not a binary. Then it is inherently unsuitable for automatic runtime selection, and all the runtime selection still has to be done in the client program. GCC requires you to compile for separate vector instruction sets in separate co

Re: What CPU extensions can we assume are available by arch?

2020-04-27 Thread Kevin Kofler
Richard Shaw wrote: > It's funny we just had this conversation yesterday, I woke up to a pull > request to add SSE support. > > https://github.com/drowe67/LPCNet/pull/25 Unfortunately, that requires SSE4.1, which is still too much to assume. Looking at the comments, the author actually tried SSE

Re: CMake3-3.17.1 on EPEL7

2020-04-27 Thread Jun Aruga
Thanks for maintaining it. I did not know we can use CMake 3 with cmake3 RPM on EPEL7. Jun -- Jun | He - His - Him ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code o

CMake3-3.17.1 on EPEL7

2020-04-27 Thread Antonio Trande
Hi all. `CMake3` on EPEL7 has been updated to the release 3.17.1; it's available for testing. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-b6a455afdf -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://k

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200427.0 compose check report

2020-04-27 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-26

2020-04-27 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:58:52AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 26. 04. 20 20:12, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > We know some people are happy with it and at least one person is not > > I hope you are not counting me as the not happy person. No, I actually included you in the first group :)

Fedora-Cloud-30-20200427.0 compose check report

2020-04-27 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Re: Orphaned rubygem-ruby_parser and rubygem-gettext_i18n_rails

2020-04-27 Thread Vít Ondruch
Actually, I have orphaned also rubygem-gettext_i18n_rails, which is required only by rubygem-activeldap. Vít Dne 27. 04. 20 v 9:40 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > Hi, > > Since I have orphaned rubygem-ruby2ruby, I don't have any other use for > rubygem-ruby_parser. While it is in dependency chain of >

Orphaned rubygem-ruby_parser

2020-04-27 Thread Vít Ondruch
Hi, Since I have orphaned rubygem-ruby2ruby, I don't have any other use for rubygem-ruby_parser. While it is in dependency chain of rubygem-activeldap and rubygem-gettext_i18n_rails, I have not heard back from rubygem-activeldap maintainer, therefore I orphaned the package. Vít

Orphaned rubygem-ruby2ruby

2020-04-27 Thread Vít Ondruch
Hi, I don't have any use for rubygem-ruby2ruby, therefore I orphaned it. Vít ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject