According to the schedule [1], Fedora 32 Candidate RC-1.5 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the curr
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 3:12 PM Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 10:53 AM Richard Shaw
> wrote:
> > So Field3D had a patch release a while ago and I build the package for
> Rawhide but haven't decided to build for F31+ because I can't tell if the
> abi changes are significant or not
On Tue, 2020-04-21 at 21:38 +, Jeremy Cline wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Over the years I've managed to collect a number of Python packages for
> which I am the sole maintainer. Sadly, I'm not really maintaining them,
> so unless anyone wants to pick them up I'm going to orphan them. They
> are:
>
On 21. 04. 20 23:38, Jeremy Cline wrote:
Hi folks,
Over the years I've managed to collect a number of Python packages for
which I am the sole maintainer. Sadly, I'm not really maintaining them,
so unless anyone wants to pick them up I'm going to orphan them. They
are:
python-idna
I can take i
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 4:24 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> For example in:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43612915
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1817659
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel maili
For example in:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43612915
annobin: spydual.c: debugging: index = 1384 max = 1917
annobin: spydual.c: ICE: attempting to access a gcc command line option that is
not stored in global_options
annobin: spydual.c: ICE: Please contact the annobin mai
Hi everyone, I would like to request a rpm build for
[protonmail-bridge](https://protonmail.com/bridge/), which recently released
its source at [github](https://github.com/ProtonMail/proton-bridge). I have
been unable to produce a build locally for reasons I don't quite understand.
There is alr
- Original Message -
> From: "Jeremy Cline"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 11:38:05 PM
> Subject: Python packages up for adoption
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Over the years I've managed to collect a number of Python packages for
> which I am the sole maintain
On Tue, 2020-04-21 at 06:22 +, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> According to the schedule [1], Fedora 32 Candidate RC-1.4 is now
> available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
> testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
> https://fedoraproject.org/
Hi folks,
Over the years I've managed to collect a number of Python packages for
which I am the sole maintainer. Sadly, I'm not really maintaining them,
so unless anyone wants to pick them up I'm going to orphan them. They
are:
python3-saml
python-args
python-clint
python-flower
python-idna
pytho
Hi, in accordance with non-responsive maintainer policy [1], does anyone
know how to contact Michal Ruprich (mruprich)?
Michal, if you're still interested in maintaining your packages, please
respond here and also in:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815163
https://bugzilla.redhat.com
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 10:53 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
> So Field3D had a patch release a while ago and I build the package for
> Rawhide but haven't decided to build for F31+ because I can't tell if the abi
> changes are significant or not and I don't want to rebuild all the
> dependencies.
>
>
Il giorno mar, 21/04/2020 alle 11.19 -0700, Samuel Sieb ha scritto:
> On 4/21/20 2:30 AM, Guido Aulisi wrote:
> > I'm trying to understand why kiss-fft (an FFT library) is failing
> > in
> > rawhide only on aarch64.
> > The failing test does some fft calculation and compares them with
> > the
> > s
On 4/21/20 2:30 AM, Guido Aulisi wrote:
I'm trying to understand why kiss-fft (an FFT library) is failing in
rawhide only on aarch64.
The failing test does some fft calculation and compares them with the
same done with numpy.
For waht I understood the upgrade of gcc and/or glibc makes this test
f
OLD: Fedora-32-20200420.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200421.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
So Field3D had a patch release a while ago and I build the package for
Rawhide but haven't decided to build for F31+ because I can't tell if the
abi changes are significant or not and I don't want to rebuild all the
dependencies.
Can someone let me know if this is safe?
Comparing the ABI of binar
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200420.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200421.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 157
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 593.93 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
The second attempt at building OCaml packages in Rawhide (in a side
tag) is under way now.
All the bugs mentioned in the previous email should have been fixed
both upstream and by backporting those changes into our compiler.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.re
TL;DR: The Fedora 32 Election cycle will be delayed due to an outage
of the Elections app. For more information, see my Community Blog
post[1].
Because the Elections app will be offline during the Fedora
infrastructure move[2], the Election schedule had to be adjusted. This
is a one-time adjustmen
On 21. 04. 20 12:50, Miro Hrončok wrote:
JFYI I plan to retire python-nose_warnings_filters on rawhide...
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecateNose
Also retired python-nose-xcover.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Passed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64)
Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso
install_default_upload:
Used mem changed from 154 MiB to 131 MiB
Peak task count changed from 120 to 103
Previous test data: https://open
Here's mine:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826326
I have to run a quick errand and afterwards I'll pick up the review
for freeopcua.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.
Hello Till,
I've taken it, and a have a simple gnome-shell extension I would like
reviewed in return.
I'm currently working with upstream on a bug, once that's solved I'll
work on the freeopuca review.
Best regards,
A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@li
Hi all,
I'm looking for a review for freeopuca, a C++ OPC-UA library:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824467
The package should be rather easy to review. I'm willing to do a review
in return.
Kind regards,
Till
___
devel mailing list -- de
JFYI I plan to retire python-nose_warnings_filters on rawhide once the two PR
are merged and built.
$ repoquery --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires
python3-nose_warnings_filters
python-ipykernel-0:5.1.4-1.fc33.src
python-notebook-0:6.0.2-4.fc33.src
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
Hi all,
I have orphaned ruybgem-slop. This used to be dependency of rubygem-pry,
but nowadays, the old version of this package is bundled in pry (:'(),
so I don't have any interested in this package.
Vít
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorapro
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
Hello,
I'm trying to understand why kiss-fft (an FFT library) is failing in
rawhide only on aarch64.
The failing test does some fft calculation and compares them with the
same done with numpy.
For waht I understood the upgrade of gcc and/or glibc makes this test
fail only on aarch64, and I cannot
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/173 (x86_64)
ID: 582088 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_remote_logging_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/582088
ID: 582107 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_remote_logging_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.or
Hi all,
I am going to orphan rubygem-diff_dirs. This package was brought in as
dependency of AsciiBinder, but AsciiBinder is long gone. Therefore it is
time to let rubygem-diff_dirs go as well.
Vít
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.or
31 matches
Mail list logo
