Good to know, thanks!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 08:10:53PM -, Jeremy Newton wrote:
> I package dolphin-emu, which bundled libcubeb in the latest version.
> I've built it in rawhide and I'm trying to systematically unbundle things.
>
> Looks like cubeb is apart of the Firefox source tree (./meda/libcubeb/).
> Should
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-b1a5eb3ef5
librabbitmq-0.5.2-2.el6
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-22ba261c73
drupal7-ckeditor-1.19-1.el6
5 https://bodhi.fedo
Am 24.03.20 um 12:04 schrieb Felix Schwarz:
> If I have some spare cycles I'll try to run the upstream test suite with
> msgpack 1.0.
just fyi: borgbackup upstream was not compatible with python-msgpack 1.0 but
upstream was (again) very helpful so the next version of borgbackup will also
support
I package dolphin-emu, which bundled libcubeb in the latest version.
I've built it in rawhide and I'm trying to systematically unbundle things.
Looks like cubeb is apart of the Firefox source tree (./meda/libcubeb/). Should
I email gecko-bugs-nob...@fedoraproject.org or make a bug report?
It look
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200410.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200411.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 95
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 8.12 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Saturday, April 11, 2020 4:22:23 PM CEST Jun Aruga wrote:
> > Also, please know that we needed to temporarily disable ppc64le
> chroots (as it was previously announced) because at this moment
> we don't have access to any builders on that architecture.
>
> Any update for Copr ppc64le chroots?
N
OLD: Fedora-32-20200410.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200411.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Dne 06. 04. 20 v 18:28 James Cassell napsal(a):
> My understanding of current policy is that it would not be permitted to have
> such a module in current fedora.
"is permitted in Fedora" vs. "is technically possible" are two different things.
Technical specification should think about layered app
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200410.0):
ID: 573448 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/573448
Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated
> Also, please know that we needed to temporarily disable ppc64le
chroots (as it was previously announced) because at this moment
we don't have access to any builders on that architecture.
Any update for Copr ppc64le chroots?
--
Jun | He - His - Him
__
On 4/11/20 4:38 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Steve Grubb wrote:
readelf -s $f 2>/dev/null | grep FUNC | egrep 'seccomp_rule_add|seccomp'
Since seccomp is a substring of seccomp_rule_add, it is pointless to grep
for both.
Yes, the output is the same. But the documentation is not as explicit.
A co
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200410.0):
ID: 573267 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/573267
Soft failed openQA tests
(Previously and briefly discussed on this list:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/2O4HBOK6PTQZAFAVIRDVMZGG2PYB2QHM/)
In:
https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/9435
Especially the second comment onwards, claims that the host triple
that our %config
Steve Grubb wrote:
> readelf -s $f 2>/dev/null | grep FUNC | egrep 'seccomp_rule_add|seccomp'
Since seccomp is a substring of seccomp_rule_add, it is pointless to grep
for both.
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
Alex Scheel wrote:
> Look folks. This isn't a Fedora-only survey. It is a survey run by Red Hat
> members who are looking to engage with a community that includes Fedora,
> Red Hat, CentOS and a bunch of other stakeholders as well. I think we can
> all recognize that Google Apps usage is high among
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
17 matches
Mail list logo
