No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 2:51 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 11:57 PM Ty Young > wrote:
>
> > You can use regular kmod packages with Fedora Silverblue (rpm-ostree
> > install kmod-nvidia). You can also use regular Fedora Workstation and
> > have akmods work perfectly.
> >
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 11:57 PM Ty Young You can use regular kmod packages with Fedora Silverblue (rpm-ostree
> install kmod-nvidia). You can also use regular Fedora Workstation and
> have akmods work perfectly.
>
We don't supply compiled kmod packages at rpmfusion, using akmod-nvidia is the
> Wait, nevermind. It’s kmod, got them confused:
>
>
> rpm-ostree install kmod-nvidia xorg-x11-drv-nvidia
You need to use the nodebug kernel
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RawhideKernelNodebug
> rpm-ostree(akmod-nvidia.post)[16484]: FATAL: modpost: GPL-incompatible
> module nvidia-drm.ko uses
>Interesting. I’ve used Fedora 30 Silverblue before and it worked(yes, using
>AKMod). Maybe this is a >regression?
>Anyway, when I looked up the error I got a result from Nvidia’s forum wherein
>a user pointed to a >kernel issue. Apologies if that isn’t the case.
Wait, nevermind. It’s kmod,
>Okay, no. This is actually a fundamental technical flaw with
>RPM-OSTree. In fact, *zero* DKMS or AKMod based packages will work
>with RPM-OSTree based systems, and has been known for at least three
>years: https://github.com/coreos/rpm-ostree/issues/1091
>It has nothing to do with any ideologica
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 11:57 PM Ty Young wrote:
>
> Either no one is testing Fedora 32 on Nvidia hardware or Fedora has
> entered an entirely new level of salt. Attempting to install from
> RPMFusion results in:
>
>
[snip error spew from rpm-ostree]
>
> No issues with Arch Linux. The driver is
Either no one is testing Fedora 32 on Nvidia hardware or Fedora has
entered an entirely new level of salt. Attempting to install from
RPMFusion results in:
Mar 28 22:32:44 localhost.localdomain
rpm-ostree(akmod-nvidia.post)[10990]: Building
/usr/src/akmods/nvidia-kmod-440.64-2.fc33.src.rpm f
On Sunday, 29 March 2020, clime wrote:
> You can make a separate namespace for this in dist-git. It doesn't need to
> be a separate branch. That way, you won't be disturbing anyone elses space.
or simply forks...
>
> clime
>
> On Friday, 27 March 2020, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>> -BEGI
You can make a separate namespace for this in dist-git. It doesn't need to
be a separate branch. That way, you won't be disturbing anyone elses space.
clime
On Friday, 27 March 2020, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> There has been a lot of (really
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 01:06:55PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 07:10:55AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >
> > I think the question about priority was asked because:
> > When installing eln by "upgrading" from rawhide, you hardly want to go
> > package by packa
From the proposal:
%if 0%{?fedora} < 32 && 0%{?rhel} <= 8
The fix will be done via a pull request that states a time limit. We
want the regular maintainers to see / comment / commit, but we also
don't want things to stall for months and get forgotten about.
---
What kind of pull request is tha
---
title: CPE Weekly status email
tags: CPE Weekly, email
---
# CPE Weekly: 2020-03-06
Background:
The Community Platform Engineering group is the Red Hat team combining
IT and release engineering from Fedora and CentOS. Our goal is to keep
core servers and services running and maintained, build
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 07:10:55AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> I think the question about priority was asked because:
> When installing eln by "upgrading" from rawhide, you hardly want to go
> package by package, but instead want to do a single command to install
> everything tha
On 28/03/2020 16:13, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-03-22 at 23:04 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> Helping to host
>> any other solution is good too, for example, Jitsi Meet provides a
>> Docker image[5] now.
>
> I will try packaging all Jitsi Meet suite [1]
Great
If you would like to ru
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64)
Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso
install_default_upload:
System load changed from 0.21 to 0.06
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/556496#downloads
Current test data: https://openq
Den tors 26 mars 2020 kl 05:56 skrev Przemek Klosowski via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>:
> On 3/21/20 8:45 AM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> > I sidegraded my rawhide install to F32 a couple of weeks ago and from
> > the start I noticed that booting F32 was really slow. I assumed this
> > was s
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Soft failed openQA tests: 2/8 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200325.0):
ID: 559655 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uef
On Sun, 2020-03-22 at 23:04 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Helping to host
> any other solution is good too, for example, Jitsi Meet provides a
> Docker image[5] now.
I will try packaging all Jitsi Meet suite [1]
[1]
https://community.jitsi.org/t/where-i-find-deb-src-or-src-rpm-of-the-packages/
OLD: Fedora-32-20200327.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200328.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 9
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 97
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 85.33 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-32-20200327.n.0):
ID: 559477 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/559477
ID: 559485 Test: x86_64 Workstation-l
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200327.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200328.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 18
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 118
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 28.27 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 7/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200327.n.0):
ID: 559286 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic
URL: https://op
On 28. 03. 20 1:01, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Do you have any ideas when rpm 4.16 will be released? I don't see any
dates on the change. Or perhaps I guess the question is when it will
land in rawhide?
From the ticket https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2360
My understanding is that 4.16 could be shipped t
On 27. 03. 20 17:02, Robbie Harwood wrote:
What if I do not want to have %if's in my spec files?
As long as your package builds in ELN then just maintain your package
like normal. If there is a build failure, the ELN SIG may provide a PR
as described above or will discuss alternative approaches
On 15. 01. 20 23:59, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
### Solution 5: Stop shipping mandatory bytecode cache
This solution sounds simple: We do no longer ship the bytecode cache
mandatorily. Technically, we move the `.pyc` files to a subpackage
of `python3-libs` (or three different subpackages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818461
CC: gilb...@gmail.com
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 8:09 PM David Cantrell wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 01:48:15PM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote:
> >On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:47 AM David Cantrell wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 10:32:26AM +0100, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
> >> >As Ben is on PTO, I'd like to pre
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 05:55:42PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 4:42 PM Jerry James wrote:
> > Good idea. Thank you!
>
> I got a segfault on s390x on the second build attempt. I'd like to
> investigate the ephemeron angle a bit, I think.
No crashes here overnight, but I'
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 04:45:50PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 03:19:01PM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 2:42 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 12:02:40PM -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> > > > Stephen Galla
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:34:49AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 3/27/20 9:55 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 09:04:53AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> >>On 3/26/20 2:35 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 02:00:49PM +0200, Pan
32 matches
Mail list logo
