No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
Am 15.03.20 um 13:32 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel:
> On 14.03.2020 13:05, Marius Schwarz wrote:
>> If you encrypt the fedora ( or any ) installation with luks, as
>> security of a mobile device indicates, you end up without the
>> possibility to enter the password, when you do not have an in/e
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 6:35 AM Jos de Kloe wrote:
> I hope someone is interested to swap reviews?
> I would like to package the python3 bindings to the eccodes package that
> I maintain, which has been split to a separate repository by upstream.
> See my review request here:
> https://bugzilla.re
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 10/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-32-20200314.n.0):
ID: 546101 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/546101
ID: 546166 Test: x86_64 universal install_bl
# F32 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2020-03-16
# Time: ** 16:00 ** UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We have 4 proposed Final blockers to review (and two Beta
AcceptedPreviousRelease blockers to check in on), so let's have a
Fedora 32 blocker review meeting tomo
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2020-03-16
# Time: ** 15:00 ** UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
We just signed off on Beta, and I figure everyone needs something to do
while we all self-isola
OLD: Fedora-32-20200314.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200315.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Hi everybody,
The latest java-1.8.0-openjdk update for rawhide (the first build with
GCC 10) seems to have introduced some serious problems - including
crashes and segmentation faults during package builds for Java
packages.
The broken update landed in rawhide with the
Fedora-Rawhide-20200313.n.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808079
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 2:37 PM Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>
> On su, 15 maalis 2020, Guido Aulisi wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I’m going to ask a FESCo exception for python2 for package ardour5.
> >Python2 is only needed to build the package using the WAF build system.
> >
> >Ardour has been undergoing a c
On su, 15 maalis 2020, Guido Aulisi wrote:
Hi,
I’m going to ask a FESCo exception for python2 for package ardour5.
Python2 is only needed to build the package using the WAF build system.
Ardour has been undergoing a complete rewriting for 2 years, no stable versions
have been released in the l
Il 15/03/20 11:22, Guido Aulisi ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I’m going to ask a FESCo exception for python2 for package ardour5.
> Python2 is only needed to build the package using the WAF build system.
>
> Ardour has been undergoing a complete rewriting for 2 years, no stable
> versions have been releas
Hi,
I hope someone is interested to swap reviews?
I would like to package the python3 bindings to the eccodes package that
I maintain, which has been split to a separate repository by upstream.
See my review request here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808878
Thanks,
Jos de Kloe
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 6:23 AM Guido Aulisi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I’m going to ask a FESCo exception for python2 for package ardour5.
> Python2 is only needed to build the package using the WAF build system.
>
> Ardour has been undergoing a complete rewriting for 2 years, no stable
> versions have
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 2:06 PM Dakota Williams
wrote:
>
> On 3/6/20 1:21 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 05/03/2020 21:26, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> >
> >> I would like to take this opportunity to remind about the PR that I have
> >> prepared - let us not duplicate the work:
> >> https://sr
On 14.03.2020 13:05, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> If you encrypt the fedora ( or any ) installation with luks, as
> security of a mobile device indicates, you end up without the
> possibility to enter the password, when you do not have an in/external
> keyboard at hand.
You should use TPM 2.0 LUKS unl
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
On la, 14 maalis 2020, Marius Schwarz wrote:
Hi all,
bevor we start, it is a VERY VERY SPECIAL situation i will talk about
now. It could get fixed by a UNUSUAL approach.
The device we talk about as an example is the SURFACE PRO Tablet Series
from Microsoft WITH a LUKS encrypted installation on
Hi,
I’m going to ask a FESCo exception for python2 for package ardour5.
Python2 is only needed to build the package using the WAF build system.
Ardour has been undergoing a complete rewriting for 2 years, no stable versions
have been released in the last 2 years,
so we are stuck with ardour 5.12
Am 14.03.20 um 10:35 schrieb Felix Schwarz:
> I just tried to push some changes to git but was unable to do.
...
>
> What I can do to get this fixed?
I tried again and somehow it worked the second time.
Felix
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedo
For what it is worth while updating R-waveslim I noticed that the license is
wrong as it says GPLv2+ while it is BSD
on my defense I should point that the homepage of the package:
http://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/waveslim/
says GPL.
I am now fixing it in the update package.
--
José Abílio
21 matches
Mail list logo
