Greetings.
Aside from a few stragglers, the mass rebuild is complete.
However, we ran into a number of builds that failed at the start of the
mass rebuild due to some problems with s390x builders.
Due to that and also to reduce the chance of any failed builds being
caused by builder or network
Thanks a lot Fabio,
I've done as you suggested! Your swift reply and answer was much
appreciated!
Chris
On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 4:24 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 10:18 PM Chris wrote:
> >
> > > I assume most package maintainers are not simultaneously upstream for
> their
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/35 (x86_64)
ID: 515952 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/515952
Passed openQA tests: 20/35 (x86_64)
Skipped non-gating openQA tests: 14 of 35
--
Mail generated by check-co
On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 10:18 PM Chris wrote:
>
> > I assume most package maintainers are not simultaneously upstream for their
> > packages.
>
> I would definitely agree with that! Just to clarify further, I guess i was
> hoping that Anitya could be smart enough to detect that a bugzilla wouldn'
> I assume most package maintainers are not simultaneously upstream for
their packages.
I would definitely agree with that! Just to clarify further, I guess i was
hoping that Anitya could be smart enough to detect that a bugzilla wouldn't
be necessary to be created in the event it's found already
On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 10:06 PM Chris wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was just curious if there as a way to dial back the Upstream Release
> Monitoring and the automatic Bugzilla ticket generation from it?
>
> I pushed a new release of my software to PyPi and I swear before I even got
> access to the shell
Hi,
I was just curious if there as a way to dial back the Upstream Release
Monitoring and the automatic Bugzilla ticket generation from it?
I pushed a new release of my software to PyPi and I swear before I even got
access to the shell again (from the successful twine upload message), I was
alrea
On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 at 19:58, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>> From
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Package_maintainer_responsibilities/#_deal_with_reported_bugs_in_a_timely_manner
>> :
>>
>> It is recommended that non-coder packagers should find
>> co-maintainers who are fam
On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 17:59, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> Richard Shaw writes:
>
> > Not replying to anyone in particular but to the thead as a whole...
> >
> > 1. Nothing in the packager introduction process prepares a packager
> > for what to do when they get a CVE filed against one of their
> > p
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 3:59 PM Robbie Harwood wrote:
> Richard Shaw writes:
>
> > Not replying to anyone in particular but to the thead as a whole...
> >
> > 1. Nothing in the packager introduction process prepares a packager
> > for what to do when they get a CVE filed against one of their
> >
On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 15:47, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> 4. I'm not a C/C++ programmer and certainly not a security expert. If I can
> find a link to a fix for another distro, such as debian, I'll apply it but
> more often than not there's nothing there when I look. I'll even file an
> issue upstr
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200131.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200201.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:6
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 14
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 173
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.93 MiB
Size of dropped packages
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
6 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 52/158 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-R
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
Dan Čermák writes:
> Rahul Sundaram writes:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 10:46 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Welcome to our lives!
>>> If it was mathematically possible to go above 100% that's how much
>>> agreement you
>>> would have from us.
>>>
>>
>> If Red Hat is using Pag
On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 8:43 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 01. 02. 20 8:36, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 01. 02. 20 0:31, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >> Hi everybody,
> >>
> >> I've noticed these a few times now, and I have *no idea* where this is
> >> coming from, for example:
> >>
> >> dnf --releaseve
On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 12:59 AM Erich Eickmeyer
wrote:
>
> Hello all!
>
> I'm Erich, the current project leader of Ubuntu Studio, the
> creativity-oriented flavor of Ubuntu. I've been leading that project for the
> past two years.
Hi Erich!
> In that time, my team and I have taken Ubuntu Studi
> > > I'm very well aware of the above, but I'm forced to use some proprietary
> > > software that is linked against gstreamer 0.10, so I need to maintain
> > > these until the software in question gets ported to gstreamer1.
> >
> > gstreamer0.10 has not received security updates -- or security adv
On 31/01/2020 11:22, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Anyway the news is that none of these branches can be compiled with
our OCaml 4.10.0-beta-1 compiler.
Thanks for picking this up. FWIW (in my limited role as the one who built
unison227 for EPEL6), I have no interest (or ability) to engage in th
On 31. 01. 20 15:01, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Friday, 31 January 2020 at 14:52, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 2:47 pm, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
I'm very well aware of the above, but I'm forced to use some proprietary
software that is linked again
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
21 matches
Mail list logo
