Re: peek package

2020-01-01 Thread Artem Tim
> You started the drama by picking on cinnamon! Me started drama? Cinnamon mentioned by original poster and he even post a link on github issue where title is: 'Peek fails to start in Cinnamon on Fedora 30' https://github.com/phw/peek/issues/485 ___ de

Re: peek package

2020-01-01 Thread Leigh Scott
> On 1/2/20 9:18 AM, Artem Tim wrote: > There are a number of screen recording alternatives that are > simpler > than OBS Studio, including vokoscreen, Kazam, Simplescreenrecorder etc, > The main problem is that most depend on FFMPEG. FFMPEG has a license > that is compatible with the main Fedor

Re: peek package

2020-01-01 Thread Leigh Scott
> * Leigh Scott [02/01/2020 02:34] : > > This is not being excellent to each other. Please consider respecting the > project policy when you are posting to a Fedora mailing list. > > Emmanuel Perhaps he shouldn't have singled out cinnamon when it equally applies to all DE's apart from gnome! __

Re: peek package

2020-01-01 Thread Leigh Scott
> Also this whole issue is more suitable for regular bug report, not for such > drama in > mailing list and salt. You started the drama by picking on cinnamon! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to dev

Re: peek package

2020-01-01 Thread Igor Gnatenko
The problem with this approach is that when you install ffmpeg, it still won't be shown in those DEs. On Thu, Jan 2, 2020, 01:57 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, Jan 01, 2020 at 09:13:28PM -, Artem Tim wrote: > > > "All package dependencies (build-time or runtime, regular, weak or > otherwise) >

Re: peek package

2020-01-01 Thread Benson Muite
On 1/2/20 9:18 AM, Artem Tim wrote: What is alternative to Peek? OBS Studio is totally different beast. OBS more advanced, using Qt framework, available only in RPM Fusion repo. Users asked many time about this Peek and why it is not available in repo and they really like it because of their

Re: peek package

2020-01-01 Thread Artem Tim
> Please prevent your useless app from displaying in cinnamon menu, I'm sure > Mate, XFCE > and LXDE would also like it removed from their menus as well. What is alternative to Peek? OBS Studio is totally different beast. OBS more advanced, using Qt framework, available only in RPM Fusion repo.

Re: peek package

2020-01-01 Thread Artem Tim
> Then OnlyShowIN=Gnome in the desktop file seems like a possible > solution. @Kevin, i'll do shortly. Also i filed a bug in upstream https://github.com/phw/peek/issues/539 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an em

Re: peek package

2020-01-01 Thread Emmanuel
* Leigh Scott [02/01/2020 02:34] : > > Please prevent your useless app [] This is not being excellent to each other. Please consider respecting the project policy when you are posting to a Fedora mailing list. Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- deve

Re: peek package

2020-01-01 Thread Leigh Scott
> Why we should drop such useful app just because it doesn't work on Cinnamon? > It works > on GNOME without ffpmeg and rpm fusion repo, see screenshot [1]. Please prevent your useless app from displaying in cinnamon menu, I'm sure Mate, XFCE and LXDE would also like it removed from their menus

Re: peek package

2020-01-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Jan 01, 2020 at 09:13:28PM -, Artem Tim wrote: > > "All package dependencies (build-time or runtime, regular, weak or > > otherwise) > > MUST ALWAYS be satisfiable within the official Fedora repositories." > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/WeakDependencie

Re: peek package

2020-01-01 Thread Artem Tim
> "All package dependencies (build-time or runtime, regular, weak or otherwise) > MUST ALWAYS be satisfiable within the official Fedora repositories." > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/WeakDependencies/ > "As with regular dependencies, weak dependencies MUST be satisfiab

Re: peek package

2020-01-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Jan 01, 2020 at 08:33:26PM -, Artem Tim wrote: > > The `peek` package has been approved in Fedora repositories [1], but it > > doesn't even start without ffmpeg installed [2], which is not > > distributed in Fedora repositories (but is available in rpmfusion): > > Why we should drop

Re: peek package

2020-01-01 Thread Artem Tim
> The `peek` package has been approved in Fedora repositories [1], but it > doesn't even start without ffmpeg installed [2], which is not > distributed in Fedora repositories (but is available in rpmfusion): Why we should drop such useful app just because it doesn't work on Cinnamon? It works o

Fedora-Rawhide-20200101.n.0 compose check report

2020-01-01 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 4/155 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20191231.n.0): ID: 502291 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/502291 ID: 502306 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso s

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200101.n.0 changes

2020-01-01 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20191231.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200101.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 4 Dropped packages:4 Upgraded packages: 20 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 473.86 KiB Size of dropped packages

[Test-Announce] Fedora 32 Rawhide 20200101.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

2020-01-01 Thread rawhide
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 32 Rawhide 20200101.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Minimize systemd for kdump's initramfs

2020-01-01 Thread Kairui Song
Hi all, I noticed there is a Fedora minimization project which seems could be a bit related to the thing I'm trying to do, and this could be a generic topic. What I'm trying to do is reduce the initramfs size used for kdump. Kdump loads a crash kernel and kdump initramfs image in a prereseved mem

Re: peek package

2020-01-01 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Jan 1, 2020, 15:51 Mattia Verga via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > The `peek` package has been approved in Fedora repositories [1], but it > doesn't even start without ffmpeg installed [2], which is not > distributed in Fedora repositories (but is available in rpmfusion):

Re: peek package

2020-01-01 Thread Carson Black
Peek only relies on ffmpeg for screen recording on non-GNOME desktops on X11, afaik. On GNOME, it uses the org.gnome.Shell.Screencast interface which offloads all of the heavy work to GNOME shell. -- Carson Black [jan Pontaoski] Am Mi., 1. Jan. 2020 um 09:51 Uhr schrieb Mattia Verga via devel :

peek package

2020-01-01 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
The `peek` package has been approved in Fedora repositories [1], but it doesn't even start without ffmpeg installed [2], which is not distributed in Fedora repositories (but is available in rpmfusion): $ peek Error: Child process exited with code 1 Unable to create default screen recorder. The

Re: Pymol is broken on Fedora 31

2020-01-01 Thread Antonio Trande
Ticket: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9137 On 31/12/19 12:33, Miro HronĨok wrote: > On 31. 12. 19 12:12, Antonio Trande wrote: >> The review is complete. Please, add me as maintainer. >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780849 > > https://pagure.io/releng/new_issue?template=packag