Fedora-Rawhide-20191231.n.0 compose check report

2019-12-31 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 5/155 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20191230.n.0): ID: 502207 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/502207 Old failures (same test fai

Re: No GCC 10 for Fedora 32? Deadline is 2019/12/31

2019-12-31 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 10:30:59AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 02:03:23PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > > Hello, all: > > > > So I again looked at > > https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-32/f-32-key-tasks.html > > and proposal submission deadline for changes requi

Re: Self Introduction: Jacek Danecki

2019-12-31 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 11:06:11AM +0100, Jacek Danecki wrote: > Hi, > > I've been using Linux for above 20 years. I've been involved in many Linux > projects > mainly closed sourced, but also open sourced: > [1] isci kernel driver > [2] dmraid > [3] mdadm > [4] KaNaPi > [5] Neo > > I was workin

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20191231.n.0 changes

2019-12-31 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20191230.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20191231.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:7 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 43 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 148.73 KiB Size of dropped packages:0

Re: orphaning bleachbit

2019-12-31 Thread David Va
Sure. But you can learn basic tasks as build using "Mock", minors changes in the macros python; or you want wait an eternity to the developer migrate to python3? Maybe when it will ready for python3, You are no longer interested in maintaining it. Good luck ;) ___

Re: Self Introduction: William Brawner

2019-12-31 Thread William Brawner
> Welcome to Fedora. Your blog is interesting. Very much enjoyed > learning > about Gitweb, have been using Gitea and it is nice to see an > alternative > lightweight git solution. You might also consider writing an article > for > the magazine ( > https://fedoramagazine.org/contribute-to-fedora

List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

2019-12-31 Thread Miro Hrončok
Dear maintainers. Based on the latest fail to build from source policy, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 32 approximately one week before branching (February 2020). Policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ The packages

Self Introduction: Michael Hrechyn

2019-12-31 Thread Michael Hrechyn
Hi! I'm Michael Hrechyn, 17 years old school boy, who lives in Belarus. In addition to studying at school, I study programming in Rust and administration of Linux systems because I like it. I have few simple open-source projects writen in Rust and they are also available in Copr. Also I maintain

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2019-12-31 Thread Miro Hrončok
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: Pymol is broken on Fedora 31

2019-12-31 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 31. 12. 19 12:12, Antonio Trande wrote: The review is complete. Please, add me as maintainer. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780849 https://pagure.io/releng/new_issue?template=package_unretirement&title=Unretire%20pymol -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok __

Re: Pymol is broken on Fedora 31

2019-12-31 Thread Antonio Trande
The review is complete. Please, add me as maintainer. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780849 On 07/12/19 12:51, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 07. 12. 19 12:46, Antonio Trande wrote: >> I'm interested. > > Cool. At this point, it would need a new package review (pymol was > retired more t

Re: updates not getting pushed for the last several days

2019-12-31 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 10:52:58AM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote: > Hi list, > > it appears that the updates have not been pushed for the last several days: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-986a024b8e > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-e98d4e55e6 > If I recal

Self Introduction: Jacek Danecki

2019-12-31 Thread Jacek Danecki
Hi, I've been using Linux for above 20 years. I've been involved in many Linux projects mainly closed sourced, but also open sourced: [1] isci kernel driver [2] dmraid [3] mdadm [4] KaNaPi [5] Neo I was working with some of you on adding mdadm support in Anaconda for Fedora 11. I'm preparing w

updates not getting pushed for the last several days

2019-12-31 Thread Julian Sikorski
Hi list, it appears that the updates have not been pushed for the last several days: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-986a024b8e https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-e98d4e55e6 If I recall correctly, there have been changes made some time ago after which the updat

Re: No GCC 10 for Fedora 32? Deadline is 2019/12/31

2019-12-31 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 02:03:23PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Hello, all: > > So I again looked at > https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-32/f-32-key-tasks.html > and proposal submission deadline for changes requiring mass rebuild is due > today > (2019/12/31). If I am correct we have n