Re: Library missing for pantheon desktop

2019-12-07 Thread Harsh Jain
Awesome, thanks for the update! I would certainly like to try out pantheon soon . I'd be happy to help if required :) On Sun, 8 Dec, 2019, 03:13 Fabio Valentini, wrote: > On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 10:33 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > > On 12/7/19 7:36 AM, Harsh Jain wrote: > > > when i tries to insta

Re: Heads up: rdma-core dropped support for 32-bit arm

2019-12-07 Thread Doug Ledford
The arm32 platform literally does not support the memory primitives needed to safely to RDMA. If we enable the support, and someone uses it, there is nothing we can do to prevent them running the risk of memory corruption. So we probably need to exclude arm32 from all these packages, or condit

Self Introduction: Dakota Williams

2019-12-07 Thread Dakota Williams via devel
Hi all! I'm working on bringing cutelyst to Fedora for my personal project. Formally, I'm a C/C++ developer, but have a strong interest in RPM packaging. I've had some packaging experience through work by backporting glib2, udisks2, and libmount to el6, as well as making pamixer and playerct

Re: modular protobuf issue (Dec. 6, 2019) recap

2019-12-07 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 2:57 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 08:18:21PM -0500, Langdon White wrote: > > ## How to determine if you have an issue and how to fix it: > > > > run: ```sudo dnf list --installed *protobuf*``` > > if you get a result that looks like > > `

Re: Library missing for pantheon desktop

2019-12-07 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 10:33 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 12/7/19 7:36 AM, Harsh Jain wrote: > > when i tries to install pantheon desktop,it showed this package was missing > > nothing provides libecal-1.2.so.19()(64bit) needed by > > wingpanel-indicator-datetime-2.1.3-3.fc30.x86_64 > > according

Re: Library missing for pantheon desktop

2019-12-07 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 12/7/19 7:36 AM, Harsh Jain wrote: when i tries to install pantheon desktop,it showed this package was missing nothing provides libecal-1.2.so.19()(64bit) needed by wingpanel-indicator-datetime-2.1.3-3.fc30.x86_64 according to this, the wingpanel indicator package required is still on fc30 ,

Unretiring procedure for PyMOL

2019-12-07 Thread Antonio Trande
Hi all. `pymol` is currently a "dead package". I prepared a new src-rpm to review it. Review ticket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780849 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openp

Re: modular protobuf issue (Dec. 6, 2019) recap

2019-12-07 Thread Felix Schwarz
Am 07.12.19 um 12:17 schrieb Miro Hrončok: And disallow all the current default modular streams. Ship defaults as traditional RPMs. Keep modularity for alternate versions. +1 With the current tooling modularity must be optional as it requires manual steps to fix packaging problems. With defau

Re: Allow comments and discussion even though an update was pushed to stable

2019-12-07 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2019-12-07 at 10:46 -0700, Jerry James wrote: > On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 9:50 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > I'm curious about this. I do get email notifications for all changes and > > comments for all my own bodhi updates plus for every update that I > > commented on. Have you turned thi

Re: Pymol is broken on Fedora 31

2019-12-07 Thread Antonio Trande
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780849 On 07/12/19 12:51, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 07. 12. 19 12:46, Antonio Trande wrote: >> I'm interested. > > Cool. At this point, it would need a new package review (pymol was > retired more than 8 weeks ago). Feel free to share it here, I can tak

Re: Allow comments and discussion even though an update was pushed to stable

2019-12-07 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2019-12-07 at 10:46 -0700, Jerry James wrote: > On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 9:50 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > I'm curious about this. I do get email notifications for all changes and > > comments for all my own bodhi updates plus for every update that I > > commented on. Have you turned thi

Re: Allow comments and discussion even though an update was pushed to stable

2019-12-07 Thread Jerry James
On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 9:50 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > I'm curious about this. I do get email notifications for all changes and > comments for all my own bodhi updates plus for every update that I > commented on. Have you turned this off, or do you mean to say you're going > to ignore bodhi emai

Re: Issue with Fedora GeoIP service

2019-12-07 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Kevin Fenzi said: > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 04:49:15PM +, Tom Hughes wrote: > > On 06/12/2019 16:41, Martin Kolman wrote: > > > On Fri, 2019-12-06 at 08:38 -0600, Chris Adams wrote: > > > > > > > I also installed the Fedora 31 GeoIP packages and ran the geoipupdate, > > > >

Re: Allow comments and discussion even though an update was pushed to stable

2019-12-07 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Il 07/12/19 17:49, Fabio Valentini ha scritto: > I'm curious about this. I do get email notifications for all changes and > comments for all my own bodhi updates plus for every update that I commented > on. Have you turned this off, or do you mean to say you're going to ignore > bodhi emails? >

Re: Allow comments and discussion even though an update was pushed to stable

2019-12-07 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Dec 7, 2019, 17:30 Mattia Verga via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Il 06/12/19 21:51, Johannes Lips ha scritto: > >> "Johannes Lips" >> > >> > >> We already have a tool for reporting issues and problems, and it's not > >> bodhi. If there's a problem with an already pushe

Re: No kernel package on Fedora Rawhide ppc64le?

2019-12-07 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sat, 7 Dec 2019, 14:46 Justin Forbes, wrote: > On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 5:01 AM Richard W.M. Jones > wrote: > >> >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39456403 >> >> DEBUG util.py:596: No matching package to install: 'kernel' >> >> I can see that ppc64le was temporarily ad

Re: modular protobuf issue (Dec. 6, 2019) recap

2019-12-07 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2019-12-07 at 10:42 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > I really think we should recommend 'dnf distro-sync', assuming it > > actually does the job, as that should return *all* installed packages > > from the newly-disabled modules to the non-modular builds, not just > >

Re: Allow comments and discussion even though an update was pushed to stable

2019-12-07 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Il 06/12/19 21:51, Johannes Lips ha scritto: >> "Johannes Lips" > >> >> We already have a tool for reporting issues and problems, and it's not >> bodhi. If there's a problem with an already pushed update, it needs to >> be in bugzilla - where it's actually discoverable - not in bodhi, where >> it

Library missing for pantheon desktop

2019-12-07 Thread Harsh Jain
when i tries to install pantheon desktop,it showed this package was missing nothing provides libecal-1.2.so.19()(64bit) needed by wingpanel-indicator-datetime-2.1.3-3.fc30.x86_64 according to this, the wingpanel indicator package required is still on fc30 , and libecal is not provided. I am current

Re: No kernel package on Fedora Rawhide ppc64le?

2019-12-07 Thread Justin Forbes
On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 5:01 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39456403 > > DEBUG util.py:596: No matching package to install: 'kernel' > > I can see that ppc64le was temporarily added to nobuildarches in > kernel.spec, and then removed. How

Re: modular protobuf issue (Dec. 6, 2019) recap

2019-12-07 Thread Charalampos Stratakis
- Original Message - > From: "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Saturday, December 7, 2019 2:55:30 PM > Subject: Re: modular protobuf issue (Dec. 6, 2019) recap > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 08:18:21PM -0500, Langdon White wrote: >

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20191207.n.0 changes

2019-12-07 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20191206.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20191207.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 148 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 212.00 KiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Pymol is broken on Fedora 31

2019-12-07 Thread Christopher Engelhard
On 07.12.19 12:46, Antonio Trande wrote: > I'm interested. > I'd be happy to co-maintain, if desired. > On 07/12/19 12:20, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> On 07. 12. 19 11:53, Henrique Castro wrote: >>> Hello! >>> Pymol is a package that, integrated with python-rdkit and other python >>> packages, makes

Re: modular protobuf issue (Dec. 6, 2019) recap

2019-12-07 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 08:18:21PM -0500, Langdon White wrote: > ## How to determine if you have an issue and how to fix it: > > run: ```sudo dnf list --installed *protobuf*``` > if you get a result that looks like > ```protobuf.x86_64 3.6.1-6.module_f31+6793+1c93c38``` > > you have encountered

Re: Working fedora-active-user script?

2019-12-07 Thread Richard Shaw
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 2:05 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 01:52:52PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > >First, done anyone have a working version of the script? Google > returns > >the github page which hasn't been updated in 3 years and currently > fails > >trying

Fedora-Rawhide-20191207.n.0 compose check report

2019-12-07 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 3 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 14/165 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedor

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Disallow Empty Password By Default

2019-12-07 Thread David Kaufmann
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 07:58:07PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > Encrypting $HOME would certainly be "an incremental improvement", but it > shouldn't be done unless the user chooses to do it, and it probably shouldn't > be done using the same passphrase they use for their user account. That

Re: modular protobuf issue (Dec. 6, 2019) recap

2019-12-07 Thread Kevin Kofler
Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 07. 12. 19 10:44, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Langdon White wrote: >>> ## What we can do going forward: >>> * Increase the awareness of the policies for Fedora Modules >>> * Investigate an "early warning system" that would indicate to packagers >>> (modular and RPM) when they m

Re: Pymol is broken on Fedora 31

2019-12-07 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 07. 12. 19 12:46, Antonio Trande wrote: I'm interested. Cool. At this point, it would need a new package review (pymol was retired more than 8 weeks ago). Feel free to share it here, I can take a look. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok _

Re: Pymol is broken on Fedora 31

2019-12-07 Thread Antonio Trande
I'm interested. On 07/12/19 12:20, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 07. 12. 19 11:53, Henrique Castro wrote: >> Hello! >> Pymol is a package that, integrated with python-rdkit and other python >> packages, makes the lives of people working with drug discovery (and >> chemistry in general too) much easier.

Re: modular protobuf issue (Dec. 6, 2019) recap

2019-12-07 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 07. 12. 19 2:18, Langdon White wrote: ## How to determine if you have an issue and how to fix it: run: ```sudo dnf list --installed *protobuf*``` if you get a result that looks like ```protobuf.x86_64  3.6.1-6.module_f31+6793+1c93c38``` you have encountered the problem. so please: run: ```s

Re: OCaml 4.09.0 rebuild complete in Rawhide (was: Re: OCaml 4.09.0 will be added to Fedora 32 via a side tag)

2019-12-07 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
We're down to just two ocaml packages which failed to build. ocaml-tplib was already discussed. ocaml-p3l requires the deprecated ocaml-x11 subpackage / X11 Graphics module. In any case this package is obsolete and I will retire it. It was essentially a research project into parallelism which wa

Re: Pymol is broken on Fedora 31

2019-12-07 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 07. 12. 19 11:53, Henrique Castro wrote: Hello! Pymol is a package that, integrated with python-rdkit and other python packages, makes the lives of people working with drug discovery (and chemistry in general too) much easier. Unfortunately, the package is broken and not even build into F31

Re: modular protobuf issue (Dec. 6, 2019) recap

2019-12-07 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 07. 12. 19 10:44, Kevin Kofler wrote: Langdon White wrote: ## What we can do going forward: * Increase the awareness of the policies for Fedora Modules * Investigate an "early warning system" that would indicate to packagers (modular and RPM) when they might be violating this policy * Request

No kernel package on Fedora Rawhide ppc64le?

2019-12-07 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39456403 DEBUG util.py:596: No matching package to install: 'kernel' I can see that ppc64le was temporarily added to nobuildarches in kernel.spec, and then removed. However there is no explanation in git, and there was no successful build

Pymol is broken on Fedora 31

2019-12-07 Thread Henrique Castro
Hello! Pymol is a package that, integrated with python-rdkit and other python packages, makes the lives of people working with drug discovery (and chemistry in general too) much easier. Unfortunately, the package is broken and not even build into F31. The maintainer has not replied to a BZ ticke

Re: modular protobuf issue (Dec. 6, 2019) recap

2019-12-07 Thread Kevin Kofler
Adam Williamson wrote: > I really think we should recommend 'dnf distro-sync', assuming it > actually does the job, as that should return *all* installed packages > from the newly-disabled modules to the non-modular builds, not just > protobuf. Unfortunately, you also need to "dnf module disable *

Re: modular protobuf issue (Dec. 6, 2019) recap

2019-12-07 Thread Kevin Kofler
Langdon White wrote: > ## What we can do going forward: > * Increase the awareness of the policies for Fedora Modules > * Investigate an "early warning system" that would indicate to packagers > (modular and RPM) when they might be violating this policy > * Request dnf notify the user when they are

Re: Fedora 31: dnf upgrade suddenly enables modular streams for protobuf

2019-12-07 Thread Kevin Kofler
Richard Shaw wrote: > I guess I should say that part of my problem is that: > > 1. I didn't ask for/want a module. This is exactly the problem with default module streams and why we (Miro Hrončok and several other people including me) want to ban them. Modules should not be forced onto users.

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Disallow Empty Password By Default

2019-12-07 Thread Kevin Kofler
John M. Harris Jr wrote: > On Friday, December 6, 2019 10:05:42 AM MST Przemek Klosowski via devel > wrote: >> Many systems have 8, 16 or even 32GB of RAM now. Mine has 16GB, and and >> I regularly run out of memory because some Chrome tab is open to a >> website that keeps reloading ads and leakin

Re: Fedora 31: dnf upgrade suddenly enables modular streams for protobuf

2019-12-07 Thread drago01
On Saturday, December 7, 2019, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2019-12-06 at 18:51 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > > After reading this thread I think this is a more serious problem than > just > > this package. I had "assumed" modules were just normal, so I didn't > > question them being installed

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Disallow Empty Password By Default

2019-12-07 Thread Kevin Kofler
John M. Harris Jr wrote: > That is simply not the case. While most new consumer x86_64 hardware comes > with UEFI on by default, unless it came with Windows installed, Secure > Boot is normally disabled. Unfortunately, most hardware out there comes preinfected with Window$. Kevin Kofler _