Le jeudi 21 novembre 2019 à 01:02 +0100, Kevin Kofler a écrit :
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Today, builds submitted by MBS made up more than 80% of total
> > builds,
> > or over 5x the number of "normal" builds.
> > What an incredible waste of resources.
>
> Especially considering what small perc
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 45 required tests failed, 2 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
FAILED: compose.clo
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 45 required tests failed, 2 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
FAILED: compose.clo
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
4 of 45 required tests failed, 2 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
FAILED: compose.clo
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 6/31 (x86_64)
ID: 481214 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/481214
ID: 481215 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/481215
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> That was put there by me. I understood from the mailing list discussions
> that you suggested the same thing as Jan, not just repeated what he said.
Indeed, I had not read Jan's mail when I sent mine.
Kevin Kofler
___
devel
Hi,
| When trying to mount a old SGI IRIX64 XFS filesystem, current Linux
| versions complain with:
| function not implemented
| So you have to use a older Linux version (e.g. 2.68).
Just for the records: i was able to read a IRIX64 XFS MO-dsik with a USB
MO-drive using
a Ubuntu Linux 4.10 Live
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771314
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|perl-P
- Original Message -
> From: "Kevin Kofler"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 1:08:34 AM
> Subject: Re: Minimization Objective report
>
> Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
> > We heard the feedback and did a lot of experimentation and benchmarking
> > wi
On 21. 11. 19 1:08, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
We heard the feedback and did a lot of experimentation and benchmarking
with a ton of different options so I really can't fathom how you are
taking credit for something that others invested so much time in.
The new Feature pa
Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
> We heard the feedback and did a lot of experimentation and benchmarking
> with a ton of different options so I really can't fathom how you are
> taking credit for something that others invested so much time in.
The new Feature page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ch
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Today, builds submitted by MBS made up more than 80% of total builds,
> or over 5x the number of "normal" builds.
> What an incredible waste of resources.
Especially considering what small percentage of the packages is actually in
modules. If more packages modularize, Koj
- Original Message -
> From: "Kevin Kofler"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2019 7:10:32 PM
> Subject: Re: Minimization Objective report
>
> Adam Jackson wrote:
> > You're right, you spend two months achieving zero towards this goal,
>
> Well, just a
On Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:20:29 AM MST Kevin Kofler wrote:
> But the scripts do not need to care about the version of Perl you are
> running, do they? It matters for compiled code, but why for Perl scripts?
> Those can just run with the default version of Perl if they support it, or
> with
On Tuesday, November 19, 2019 3:52:27 AM MST Petr Pisar wrote:
> If you start fidling with things in PATH, you have the problem of SCL. And
> as you wrote, SCL is terrible. And that was the reason why we have
> modularity: We do not want to relocate code to non-standard paths.
I may be a bit confu
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2019-11-21 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2019-11-21 09:00 PST US/Pacific
2019-11-21
On Wednesday, November 20, 2019 2:19:22 AM MST Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 20. 11. 19 v 0:52 John M. Harris Jr napsal(a):
>
> >
> >
> >> -- trimming functionality and/or moving functionality to sub-packages
> >> or separate package.
> >
> > For what purpose? Can you provide an example of a package w
There will be an outage starting at 2019-11-20 22:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 1 hour.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-11-20 22:00 UTC'
Reason for outage:
We will be updating the koji hub to version 1.19.1
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019, 19:00 Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> The Fedora change template here:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EmptyTemplate
>
> Says you should reference the "Targeted release" in the status.
>
> For F31 and F32 it doesn't appear as if the pages were created:
> https://fedoraproj
Adam Jackson wrote:
> You're right, you spend two months achieving zero towards this goal,
Well, just a few days ago, I managed to stop a Change that would have almost
doubled Python 3's size wherever both the python3 executable and the
libpython3 library are needed, and to point out an alternat
The Fedora change template here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EmptyTemplate
Says you should reference the "Targeted release" in the status.
For F31 and F32 it doesn't appear as if the pages were created:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/31/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 6:05 PM David Malcolm wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-11-20 at 11:22 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-11-20 at 02:53 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > Adam Jackson wrote:
> > > > That's about 44M worth of potential savings out of a 204M base
> > > > image, a
> > > > bit ov
On Wed, 2019-11-20 at 11:22 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-11-20 at 02:53 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Adam Jackson wrote:
> > > That's about 44M worth of potential savings out of a 204M base
> > > image, a
> > > bit over 20%. I'll happily file proper bug reports for these
> > > somewh
On Wed, 2019-11-20 at 02:53 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Jackson wrote:
> > That's about 44M worth of potential savings out of a 204M base image, a
> > bit over 20%. I'll happily file proper bug reports for these somewhere
> > if we want, but it took me like 30 minutes to look into this. If yo
On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 at 10:25, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > Your comments on what you expect OTHER people to do for YOU come across as
> > we are all your slaves or serfs. I really expect that isn't your
> > intention, but this mode of communication undermines everything
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 12:10 PM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:43 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > I've been noticing irregular, weird surges in koji activity for the
> > past few weeks, and today, another one happened. Within 2 hours (8AM
> > and 10AM UTC), MBS submitted ±3
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 22:07, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Buildroot-only modules? Stuff Java packagers shouldn't use? Why should we
>> let one individual packager hold the entire Java ecosystem on Fedora
>> hostage with such antisocial diktats?
>
> Because the alternative
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 6:32 AM Till Hofmann
wrote:
> On 11/20/19 4:49 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > So the problem is really with YAML. It looks like Till Hofmann built
> > yaml-cpp 0.6.3 for Fedora 30 and 31 (I only built it for Rawhide) and
> > did not rebuild OCIO.
> >
>
> Yes I did. There was
Thank you Dan for investigating the cause.
Ralf
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-cond
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 7:18 AM Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Unfortunately, I doubt that Thomas has sufficient packaging experience to
> do
> a review swap.
>
One of the things we should always strive for in Fedora is to assume
positive intent. In this situation, that would mean assuming it was an
acc
On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 22:07, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
> > I see that Mikolaj has a vision how it supposed to work. And I think he
> > spent quite some time designing the workflow which would fit this vision,
> > thus it is worth to listen to it with an open mind.
> >
> >
On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 11:18:58 +0100
Dan Horák wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 10:03:41 -
> "Ralf Senderek" wrote:
>
> > Koschei has informed me that Cryptlib fails to build in F31 on the
> > ppc64le platform. The build error is an upackaged file
> > "/usr/lib64/st8bPtV6" which obviously should
On 11/20/19 1:32 PM, Till Hofmann wrote:
On 11/20/19 4:49 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 9:27 PM Luya Tshimbalanga
mailto:l...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote:
Some users reported Blender which I maintain failed to start due to
this issue:
blender: symbol lookup err
On 11/20/19 4:49 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 9:27 PM Luya Tshimbalanga
mailto:l...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote:
Some users reported Blender which I maintain failed to start due to
this issue:
blender: symbol lookup error: /lib64/libOpenColorIO.so.1: undefined sy
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> I will take your review in exchange of mine below:
Unfortunately, I doubt that Thomas has sufficient packaging experience to do
a review swap. Packaging binary blobs as he did is a complete no go in
Fedora, everything must be built from source.
Kevin Kofler
__
On 2019-11-19, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 19, 2019 4:42:31 AM MST Petr Pisar wrote:
>> Manual work. Random commiters skipping them.
>
> If your goal is to make it so that "Random commiters" are packagers, that's
> going to fall flat very quickly - as they'll just throw one ve
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:43 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> I've been noticing irregular, weird surges in koji activity for the
> past few weeks, and today, another one happened. Within 2 hours (8AM
> and 10AM UTC), MBS submitted ±350 builds to koji (of which almost half
> failed), drowning out any
Hi everybody,
I've been noticing irregular, weird surges in koji activity for the
past few weeks, and today, another one happened. Within 2 hours (8AM
and 10AM UTC), MBS submitted ±350 builds to koji (of which almost half
failed), drowning out any other build activity:
koji list-builds --after=20
On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 10:03:41 -
"Ralf Senderek" wrote:
> Koschei has informed me that Cryptlib fails to build in F31 on the
> ppc64le platform. The build error is an upackaged file
> "/usr/lib64/st8bPtV6" which obviously should never exist at all.
>
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/t
Koschei has informed me that Cryptlib fails to build in F31 on the ppc64le
platform.
The build error is an upackaged file "/usr/lib64/st8bPtV6" which obviously
should never
exist at all.
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/6682/39076682/build.log
I've tried to reproduce the failed bui
Dne 19. 11. 19 v 20:32 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> On 19. 11. 19 20:20, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> In the spirit of positivity and collaboration, I spent a few minutes
>> looking at the results given to try to find some easy wins. Here's what
>> I found:
>>
>> python3-libs ships multiple copies of its p
Dne 20. 11. 19 v 0:52 John M. Harris Jr napsal(a):
>
>> -- trimming functionality and/or moving functionality to sub-packages
>> or separate package.
> For what purpose? Can you provide an example of a package which would benefit
> from this, that does not already do something similar?
>
For exa
I recently became co-maintainer for python-pyphen and noticed that the package
had an incomplete license tag.
python-pyphen.spec
-License:LGPLv2+
+License:GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+ or MPLv1.1
Felix
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorapr
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 11:42 PM Kevin Kofler
wrote:
> Adam Samalik wrote:
> > 1/ A history chart for base images [2] is now being generated — includes
> > data since 25 September. It's a bit rough initial implementation, but
> it's
> > there!
>
> Almost 2 months of work to save… 0.5%! That does
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 7:16 PM Robbie Harwood wrote:
> Adam Samalik writes:
>
> > This is the Minimization Objective [0] update.
> >
> > Status: Discovery phase
> >
> > == Next phase approval ==
> >
> > Next phase proposal [1] is being voted on by the Council — only positive
> > votes so far!
>
45 matches
Mail list logo
